Really no need for me to be = on the call. Just clarifying since I was copied on the = messages.

Karim

Sent from my = iPad

On Jan 29, 2011, at 9:37 AM, James Hunt <jhunt@4dco.net> wrote:

sure - although one = of the rationalizations that we will likely have to have is your = commitment of 20% commission if our deal is 30%. Maybe we should = have some discussion before you get on??

jim

On Jan 28, 2011, at = 10:23 PM, Karim Hijazi wrote:

Gentlemen,

I've been copied on this thread. Would you like me to call in on = Tuesday?

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 28, 2011, = at 9:38 PM, Don Begley <dbegley@mitagroup.com> = wrote:

YEP =96 I=92ll be back around 2:45=85=85don=92t = have anything else until 5PM

Regards,

DB

<image001.jpg>Don Begley, = Partner
8320 Old Courthouse Rd, = Suite 200
Vienna, Virginia = 22182
Phone=96 = 703.626.2629

From: James Hunt [mailto:jhunt@4dco.net]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 8:52 PM
To: John = Farrell
Cc: khijazi@unveillance.com; Don = Begley
Subject: Re: Discussions regarding Federal

don would now like to change this to perhaps 3:15 or = 3:30. might that work?

jim

On Jan 28, 2011, at 2:42 PM, John Farrell = wrote:

Yes, = that works for me. I can meet you at your office. Thanks

From: = James Hunt <jhunt@mitagroup.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:12:01 +0000
To: John Farrell = <jmfarrell@yahoo.com>
Cc: James Hunt <jhunt@mitagroup.com>, "khijazi@unveillance.com" = <khijazi@unveillance.com>, = Don Begley <dbegley@mitagroup.com>
Subject: Re: Discussions regarding = Federal

How = about 1pm?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 28, 2011, at 12:38 PM, = "John Farrell" <jmfarrell@yahoo.com> = wrote:

Jim,
Sure, = Tuesday afternoon can work. What time is best?

Have a = great weekend.

John

From: James = Hunt <jhunt@mitagroup.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:37:05 +0000
To: John Farrell = <jmfarrell@yahoo.com>, "khijazi@unveillance.com" = <khijazi@unveillance.com> Cc: Don Begley <dbegley@mitagroup.com>
= Subject: RE: Discussions regarding Federal

Perhaps next Tuesday = afternoon?

Jim Hunt, Managing = Partner

MITA Group, = Inc.
703/338-6414 - = cell

703/903-0201 - = fax

From: John Farrell [mailto:jmfarrell@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:17 PM
To: James = Hunt; khijazi@unveillance.com
Cc: Don Begley
Subject: Re: Discussions regarding = Federal

Jim,

Good morning. I am happy to sit = down and discuss anytime. Please advise your availability and I will = come to your office. Thanks

John

From: James = Hunt <jhunt@mitagroup.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:03:37 +0000
To: "khijazi@unveillance.com" = <khijazi@unveillance.com>, = "jfarrell@isccorp.com" <jfarrell@isccorp.com>, John = Farrell <jmfarrell@yahoo.com>
Cc: Don Begley <dbegley@mitagroup.com>
= Subject: Discussions regarding Federal

John,

Karim and = I are here him my office working our way forward with Unveillance = Federal.

=

We have = agreed that we will move ahead under the present LOI we have for my = development of a separate company to build the federal Unveillance = company if, after the first week in February, there are still lose ends = with Karim and his various partnering and employment relationships that = need further clarification. If that=92s the case, then the LOI = will provide for a vehicle to fold Unveillance Federal back into = Unveillance should that be warranted for a purchaser or other investment = in the parent.

If we can get = appropriate lose ends tied up, I have committed to bring Unveillance to = a very strong angel group here in town and put the best foot forward to = raise Karim a seven figure investment. That would be my preferred = approach and I think Karim=92s. But these are smart investors and = they will and all of the expect solification of the company in = place.

Either way, I want to = move forward with a federal offering for the product. If the = Unveillance package doesn=92t raise funding to bring the two groups = together, then I want to move forward quickly to establish the service = offering in federal. I realize that some of the value is = perishable so don=92t want to let much grass grow.

I think that a = relationship with you in the federal piece is a real advantage and would = like to talk about how we best mobilize realizing that at this point we = don=92t have the wherewithal to provide much if any base = salary.

So probably the best = thing to do would be to sit down and discuss your perspective on what = the relationship might look like.

=
Jim Hunt, Managing = Partner
MITA Group, = Inc.

703/338-6414 - = cell
703/903-0201 - = fax