From - Sat May 21 19:26:24 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Delivered-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Received: by 10.223.97.65 with SMTP id k1cs144685fan; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.166.200 with SMTP id p8mr1416214icy.87.1295466226355; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:43:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f173.google.com (mail-gx0-f173.google.com [209.85.161.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h22si7270196vbz.70.2011.01.19.11.43.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.161.173 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jtubbs@unveillance.com) client-ip=209.85.161.173; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.161.173 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jtubbs@unveillance.com) smtp.mail=jtubbs@unveillance.com Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so20166gxk.4 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:43:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.186.11 with SMTP id j11mr1359559ybf.221.1295466225578; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:43:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [10.23.37.195] ([166.137.13.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm4588574ybj.22.2011.01.19.11.43.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:43:45 -0800 (PST) Subject: @IdentityG, 1/19/11 11:54 From: "J. Tubbs" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--668560138 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:43:39 -0500 To: Karim Hijazi Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8C148) X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8C148) --Apple-Mail-2--668560138 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Identity Guard (@IdentityG) 1/19/11 11:54 RT @IdentityG_Steve Do-it-yourself malware kits circulating around the Inter= net are growing at an exponential rate http://ht.ly/3GznT -J.= --Apple-Mail-2--668560138 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Identity Guard (@IdentityG)
1/19/11 11:54
RT @IdentityG_Steve Do-it-yourself malware kits circulating around the Internet are growing at an exponential rate http://ht.ly/3GznT

-J.

--Apple-Mail-2--668560138-- From - Sat May 21 19:26:24 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Delivered-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Received: by 10.223.97.65 with SMTP id k1cs144761fan; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:45:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.145.21 with SMTP id s21mr1280154ybd.434.1295466317751; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:45:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com (mail-yw0-f45.google.com [209.85.213.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u4si16113605ybh.62.2011.01.19.11.45.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:45:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.213.45 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jtubbs@unveillance.com) client-ip=209.85.213.45; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.213.45 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jtubbs@unveillance.com) smtp.mail=jtubbs@unveillance.com Received: by ywl5 with SMTP id 5so503792ywl.4 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:45:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.92.13 with SMTP id p13mr1348999agb.39.1295466317001; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:45:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [10.23.37.195] ([166.137.13.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 35sm8854641ano.11.2011.01.19.11.45.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:45:16 -0800 (PST) Subject: @kanguru_news, 1/19/11 13:00 From: "J. Tubbs" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3--668468439 Message-Id: <70A36E4C-398B-4B29-8ED5-540475CB0ECA@unveillance.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:45:11 -0500 To: Karim Hijazi Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8C148) X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8C148) --Apple-Mail-3--668468439 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Kanguru Solutions (@kanguru_news) 1/19/11 13:00 Can the government prevent a DDoS attack? http://bit.ly/gN0EZW #infosec #cyb= ersecurity -J.= --Apple-Mail-3--668468439 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Kanguru Solutions (@kanguru_news)
1/19/11 13:00
Can the government prevent a DDoS attack? http://bit.ly/gN0EZW #infosec #cybersecurity

-J.

--Apple-Mail-3--668468439-- From - Sat May 21 19:26:24 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Delivered-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Received: by 10.223.97.65 with SMTP id k1cs151369fan; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:40:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.13.16 with SMTP id z16mr1904142ebz.45.1295476815999; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:40:15 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from smtpq-133-115.prolocation.net (smtpq-133-115.prolocation.net [94.228.133.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t44si18628709eeh.21.2011.01.19.14.40.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:40:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 94.228.133.115 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of arnieb@securityzones.net) client-ip=94.228.133.115; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 94.228.133.115 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of arnieb@securityzones.net) smtp.mail=arnieb@securityzones.net Received: from c-24-15-91-202.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([24.15.91.202] helo=arniePC) by relay20.prolocation.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PfghK-0002dL-J2 for khijazi@unveillance.com; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:40:14 +0100 From: "Arnie Bjorklund" To: References: <4D3672E4.80903@unveillance.com> In-Reply-To: <4D3672E4.80903@unveillance.com> Subject: RE: Unveillance Materials Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:40:15 -0600 Message-ID: <01b301cbb829$d87d2080$89776180$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acu3l6gyg7sHcxN/SFGia8p2BxIujgAkUKsg Content-Language: en-us Hi Karim - thanks for the info, most helpful. I would like to discuss... please let me know when you have a minute. I have a hosting provider that could be a good fit, and would like to see how we can make this fit. Two strategic items to consider: 1 - Have you considered offering a trial in which you only scan and report on part of their network? This may be a way to offer limited use trial. I see an issue getting companies interested in the service without trying it first... I think that could seriously limit the uptake. I think a limited view of their network, would certainly peak their interest. 2 - pricing model may need to be tweaked for this market segment, they just don't have the funding that F1000 Enterprises do, yet I do think this could be a good report/tool for them. Look forward to discussing. Arnie > -----Original Message----- > From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:13 PM > To: Arnie Bjorklund > Subject: Unveillance Materials > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Arnie, > > Great catching up with you. Attached are a group of documents for your > review. Take a look and lets discuss when you have some time.. > > Thanks, > > Karim > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNnLkAAoJEIk0Dw4U/G3laIQH/A9PQIsEBweqIGBb/Rxg+gt5 > p2SIpAFReYvy9bIj3RHxp/90C8MF2oNLAg/d8l8S/2tNp9sr3XoPmYbsltOWhS8a > ysc0ymwYi7l2/ofrUrx43D8HKzXex48fUh/6QuZ1keZJHCjZYfMd/JDu2jumaxQY > eAbgDkgCP0+QVl/4Qg69H3qGLmjU7UtUcA4Yf1TFpsHokKk/cCEl64jZNstP//cw > 95dy+s/aHM8apSbwkjzkwx9FJE+K6aPJkGMqPsjNSVjVfcvfudpjFO5hPsuWL3mW > 9rwltL6hLL/bL1DeM3zWPxtUemfmpjP+v7lSbizj2D7N66ZKj2BwV6GRvdVrKyU= > =FivO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From - Sat May 21 19:26:24 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Delivered-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Received: by 10.223.97.65 with SMTP id k1cs137245fan; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:45:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.4.212 with SMTP id 20mr938917bks.172.1295459154834; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:45:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from p3plsmtpa01-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa01-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.82.85]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id n30si6996355vcf.49.2011.01.19.09.45.54; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:45:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 72.167.82.85 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jeff@grayconsultingco.com) client-ip=72.167.82.85; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 72.167.82.85 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jeff@grayconsultingco.com) smtp.mail=jeff@grayconsultingco.com Received: (qmail 7436 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2011 17:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (174.49.68.158) by p3plsmtpa01-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.85) with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2011 17:45:48 -0000 From: "Jeff Gray" To: References: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> In-Reply-To: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> Subject: RE: RE: Trip to DC Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:45:34 -0500 Message-ID: <009501cbb800$ad7c5af0$087510d0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Acu352bJaos/AqhOSj6ctyM5pxbwnwAF3zSw Content-Language: en-us I am having a hard time seeing the value to the Company in a "stand alone" deal with Jim for Unveillance fed. The way his powerpoint reads, he suggests you punt the fed ball to him, with no cash consideration, no business plan, a three year exclusive, with a rev share if it works. More on this later, but I would be very cautious about indicating to Jim that you're going to do a deal with him, or not -- I think you need to hold him in limbo a bit. Jeff PS - What's the agenda for the DC trip? PPS - I'm concerned about Graber. -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:45 AM To: Jeff Gray Subject: Fwd: RE: Trip to DC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim is pressing to get fed piece in order. If that doesn't indicate his interest, I don't know what does. KH - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Trip to DC Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:13:31 +0000 From: James Hunt To: khijazi@unveillance.com I'd like to get the federal agreement in place, signed, etc. before we move forward. I realize that it could be overtaken by events if we find a more overarching approach to entire company participation but want to get the fed deal in place in the meantime. Does that make senses? Jim Jim Hunt, Managing Partner MITA Group, Inc. 703/338-6414 - cell 703/903-0201 - fax - -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:19 AM To: James Hunt Subject: Trip to DC Jim, I am planning my trip to DC next week sometime. I am also due to meet up with John Farrell as well. Let me know what times work for you. Thanks Jim. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNvjSAAoJEIk0Dw4U/G3lyjIIALuEuNQNJcUe089fiQieaZDX HSrSuuW2LjXRtJbo9JiV48uoOTqoeLL2HHNWhauPGn4wGJpIOQl7zGVKRiWATPw1 MYoSHMR3n5B3aDtf2+Mj3D4mn8ILIYDJfapGPTS2Si8xrhdYhVzzqSoPVhf87WC6 KF5YllocLgNgOnZfa/JKiD0eInE8YEoPB1+rX0Xs2XPZBsp+UsNcPEJHXp1em0oc TYhcxm/azrda9nZuYAYoVdveZ4yDqfyxMiZRe6iDa4ctXRimCR4ML0uclCGrEvZm AOZtqO1FavCUrU8r72xRz72P7CqTfxFyEkIq1zAjZYuRZYIvjnN65NXCXDarJ8Q= =xYCg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From - Sat May 21 19:26:24 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Delivered-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Received: by 10.223.97.65 with SMTP id k1cs137403fan; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:50:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.82.96 with SMTP id a32mr914223bkl.179.1295459415280; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:50:15 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from p3plsmtpa01-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa01-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.82.85]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id h3si6996767vcr.155.2011.01.19.09.50.14; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 72.167.82.85 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jeff@grayconsultingco.com) client-ip=72.167.82.85; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 72.167.82.85 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jeff@grayconsultingco.com) smtp.mail=jeff@grayconsultingco.com Received: (qmail 26554 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2011 17:50:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (174.49.68.158) by p3plsmtpa01-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.85) with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2011 17:50:12 -0000 From: "Jeff Gray" To: References: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> In-Reply-To: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> Subject: RE: RE: Trip to DC Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:49:58 -0500 Message-ID: <009601cbb801$4a9ad410$dfd07c30$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Acu352bJaos/AqhOSj6ctyM5pxbwnwAGa2/g Content-Language: en-us PPPS - If you do an exclusive deal at this early stage with no concrete upside to the Company, it will NOT present well to potential investors. Let's not discuss this with Glenn tomorrow. -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:45 AM To: Jeff Gray Subject: Fwd: RE: Trip to DC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim is pressing to get fed piece in order. If that doesn't indicate his interest, I don't know what does. KH - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Trip to DC Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:13:31 +0000 From: James Hunt To: khijazi@unveillance.com I'd like to get the federal agreement in place, signed, etc. before we move forward. I realize that it could be overtaken by events if we find a more overarching approach to entire company participation but want to get the fed deal in place in the meantime. Does that make senses? Jim Jim Hunt, Managing Partner MITA Group, Inc. 703/338-6414 - cell 703/903-0201 - fax - -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:19 AM To: James Hunt Subject: Trip to DC Jim, I am planning my trip to DC next week sometime. I am also due to meet up with John Farrell as well. Let me know what times work for you. Thanks Jim. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNvjSAAoJEIk0Dw4U/G3lyjIIALuEuNQNJcUe089fiQieaZDX HSrSuuW2LjXRtJbo9JiV48uoOTqoeLL2HHNWhauPGn4wGJpIOQl7zGVKRiWATPw1 MYoSHMR3n5B3aDtf2+Mj3D4mn8ILIYDJfapGPTS2Si8xrhdYhVzzqSoPVhf87WC6 KF5YllocLgNgOnZfa/JKiD0eInE8YEoPB1+rX0Xs2XPZBsp+UsNcPEJHXp1em0oc TYhcxm/azrda9nZuYAYoVdveZ4yDqfyxMiZRe6iDa4ctXRimCR4ML0uclCGrEvZm AOZtqO1FavCUrU8r72xRz72P7CqTfxFyEkIq1zAjZYuRZYIvjnN65NXCXDarJ8Q= =xYCg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From - Sat May 21 19:26:24 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.0.191] (184-77-43-130.gar.clearwire-wmx.net [184.77.43.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x35sm9889466wfd.1.2011.01.19.09.52.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:52:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D3724C6.9060303@unveillance.com> Disposition-Notification-To: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:52:06 -0500 From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email Reply-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Organization: Unveillance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Gray Subject: Re: Trip to DC References: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> <009601cbb801$4a9ad410$dfd07c30$@com> In-Reply-To: <009601cbb801$4a9ad410$dfd07c30$@com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080005000909080502060101" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080005000909080502060101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Understood. At this point I do have an MOU/LOI signed with Jim - fyi. KH On 1/19/2011 12:49 PM, Jeff Gray wrote: > PPPS - If you do an exclusive deal at this early stage with no > concrete upside to the Company, it will NOT present well to > potential investors. > > Let's not discuss this with Glenn tomorrow. > > -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email > [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 > 9:45 AM To: Jeff Gray Subject: Fwd: RE: Trip to DC > > > Jim is pressing to get fed piece in order. If that doesn't > indicate his interest, I don't know what does. > > KH > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Trip to DC > Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:13:31 +0000 From: James Hunt > To: khijazi@unveillance.com > > > > > I'd like to get the federal agreement in place, signed, etc. before > we move forward. I realize that it could be overtaken by events if > we find a more overarching approach to entire company participation > but want to get the fed deal in place in the meantime. Does that > make senses? > > Jim > > > Jim Hunt, Managing Partner MITA Group, Inc. 703/338-6414 - cell > 703/903-0201 - fax > > -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email > [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 > 8:19 AM To: James Hunt Subject: Trip to DC > > > Jim, > > I am planning my trip to DC next week sometime. I am also due to > meet up with John Farrell as well. Let me know what times work for > you. Thanks Jim. > - -- All the best, Karim Hijazi CEO | President Unveillance O. (404) 585-7487 M. (561) 542-5704 www.unveillance.com khijazi@unveillance.com ******************************************** CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION This message is for the named person's use only. The information contained in this communication is confidential and/or privileged, proprietary information that is transmitted solely for the purpose of the intended recipient(s). No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender or any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. ******************************************** -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNyTFAAoJEIk0Dw4U/G3l0vkIAODlyQT9mDUIcZ327XmQHLjv c0OOd5hDN896uy6hOHrUWI/WGOOfIt3HbZWBdJqeLM3XrNqJdnvwEGUvQQjjtDtg QjVFVkwM1pCuohEO3aADFk2aqDUgkIqyXaliswz0iaeWhHL9DNl7ms8MGxwqkdFY jy1+B/jbIzzPM4BUHUSpKJtIQKTbtGRnUDrrlXlFdGRvvBcAUiuf5klGpr3kiQaG rzPB8hGE/amesP0r3MbUFx6b325LJylF5YfEZJKhFNJ8d7EgpI5PXY0ftgslr3pk 6utPlHxKPXrYPPr8Y6CLHRQzYMsLdAk8WySqPPbrKmL12eGSs71HGdrLV+irLds= =Evoa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------080005000909080502060101 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Understood. At this point I do have an MOU/LOI signed with Jim - fyi.

KH

On 1/19/2011 12:49 PM, Jeff Gray wrote:
> PPPS - If you do an exclusive deal at this early stage with no
> concrete upside to the Company, it will NOT present well to
> potential investors.
>
> Let's not discuss this with Glenn tomorrow.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email
> [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011
> 9:45 AM To: Jeff Gray Subject: Fwd: RE: Trip to DC
>
>
> Jim is pressing to get fed piece in order. If that doesn't
> indicate his interest, I don't know what does.
>
> KH
>
> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Trip to DC
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:13:31 +0000 From: James Hunt
> <jhunt@mitagroup.com> To: khijazi@unveillance.com
> <khijazi@unveillance.com>
>
>
>
> I'd like to get the federal agreement in place, signed, etc. before
> we move forward. I realize that it could be overtaken by events if
> we find a more overarching approach to entire company participation
> but want to get the fed deal in place in the meantime. Does that
> make senses?
>
> Jim
>
>
> Jim Hunt, Managing Partner MITA Group, Inc. 703/338-6414 - cell
> 703/903-0201 - fax
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email
> [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011
> 8:19 AM To: James Hunt Subject: Trip to DC
>
>
> Jim,
>
> I am planning my trip to DC next week sometime. I am also due to
> meet up with John Farrell as well. Let me know what times work for
> you. Thanks Jim.
>

- --
All the best,

Karim Hijazi
CEO | President
Unveillance
O. (404) 585-7487
M. (561) 542-5704
www.unveillance.com
khijazi@unveillance.com

********************************************
CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION This message is for the named
person's use only. The information contained in this communication is
confidential and/or privileged, proprietary information that is
transmitted solely for the purpose of the intended recipient(s). No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy
any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or
indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this
message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender or any of
its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through its networks.
********************************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNyTFAAoJEIk0Dw4U/G3l0vkIAODlyQT9mDUIcZ327XmQHLjv
c0OOd5hDN896uy6hOHrUWI/WGOOfIt3HbZWBdJqeLM3XrNqJdnvwEGUvQQjjtDtg
QjVFVkwM1pCuohEO3aADFk2aqDUgkIqyXaliswz0iaeWhHL9DNl7ms8MGxwqkdFY
jy1+B/jbIzzPM4BUHUSpKJtIQKTbtGRnUDrrlXlFdGRvvBcAUiuf5klGpr3kiQaG
rzPB8hGE/amesP0r3MbUFx6b325LJylF5YfEZJKhFNJ8d7EgpI5PXY0ftgslr3pk
6utPlHxKPXrYPPr8Y6CLHRQzYMsLdAk8WySqPPbrKmL12eGSs71HGdrLV+irLds=
=Evoa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------080005000909080502060101-- From - Sat May 21 19:26:24 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.0.191] (184-77-43-130.gar.clearwire-wmx.net [184.77.43.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c30sm8783713anc.20.2011.01.19.10.32.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:32:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D372E4A.6040600@unveillance.com> Disposition-Notification-To: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:32:42 -0500 From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email Reply-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Organization: Unveillance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Gray Subject: Fwd: Re: Moving Forward X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010701040502080007040107" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010701040502080007040107 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Moving Forward Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:57:58 -0500 From: John Farrell To: Karim, Good morning. I met with Steve Noel, PhD from GMU on Monday. He's the lead developer for the Cauldron program. He was the same person I talked to about Endgames data over a year ago. He'll be the key person to help integrate the Unveillance data. If you need any technical questions resolved, I am sure John W will rely on him for support. He developed their schema John can provide you with this standard). On the subject of my position, I thought about this over the past couple days. I completely understand your reservations. We don't have a long relationship working together, so you don't have a track record of my performance to make an informed decision. Likewise, I don't have the same about you and your partners. However, I think we both think there's a mutual benefit to working together and have many similar ideas. I believe time will prove that we will make a great team. Like your equity in the company, my contacts and relationships are the equity I bring to the table. I am reluctant to just turn over all this information without some commitment. As you say, they did a "number" on me and it has caused me to be extremely conservative. I would like to work out an "interim" deal with you that will: 1. Give you a chance to evaluate my performance 2. Give me a chance to understand the offering and how it will/can be sold 3. Provide you with enough time to negotiate funding and develop the equity plan 4. Get me working on your behalf immediately and generating sales and leads Since you've already provided me with an initial agreement, I thought we can discuss these components: 1. Base/retainer 2. Commission 3. Equity Whiel I am evaluating all options, I need to balance the Unveillance opportunity (and risk) against other positions I am considering (I am holding off one company right now on their offer). I am considering: - - full time employment - - 1099 for 2 or more companies - - establishing my own company (this will take a bit of time) - - other options To give you some numbers to work with, I am seeking a total package that puts me in this range: 1. $150-175K base (my base salary over the past year has been in this range, plus benefits) 2. $100-150K commission (with no cap in the event I bring in a large deal) 3. Equity - depends on the company and the opportunity If you would consider an interim agreement, we could start out with a lower base/retainer and higher commission rate. I know it will take you some time to work out the investors, but I am most interested in the equity (this is the primary reason I would consider taking another risk on a start up firm). Since I have a limited timeframe to make a decision, I would appreciate your feedback and thoughts. Hopefully this gives you some ideas and we can certainly discuss alternatives. Let me know when you have time to talk. I am available via cell phone and Skype (jmfarrell83). Thanks! John On 1/10/11 12:49 PM, "Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email" wrote: > > John, > > Thanks for your email outlining your stance on a number of fronts. > I was very helpful for me to understand where your head is > regarding our potential working relationship. I will address each > issue as you presented them in your former email: > > Unveillance - ProInfo: > > I do see a great synergy there and I think that is agreed upon > across the board. We are now finalizing our API structure to > accommodate other systems like Cauldron which works as a fantastic > middle-ware for us and a "connector" to other locally installed > devices and hardware. I have no doubt John Williams and I will be > able to find an amiable structure for pricing and commissioning our > collaborative sales. I think your idea about deal registration is > excellent. It would be a great starting point for us to get > comfortable with each other. I would like to get a copy of > Cauldron but as I have indicated to both you and John W., I have > budgeted down to the penny as of late and need to stick to my > financial plans until I get some clarity with MITA and some other > angel groups. I don't see this extending beyond this month. With > regard to Hunt himself, I do see him as a part of Unveillance > (board and advisory at minimum) money or not. I think you agree > that there is no down side to that. > > John Farrell - Unveillance: > > I do see your point regarding a "commission-only" sales position. > It sounds like EGS did a number on you and I can understand your > apprehension. Inversely, I have also learned some lessons about > compensating prior to some sort of proving period. This > absolutely nothing personal but, as you can imagine, everyone > claims they have the most elaborate Rolodex and connectivity in > this solar system! I have tried to make it a point that I want to > see it to believe it. I actually have that exact scenario in > Unveillance today with a commission only sales executive that gave > me a sterling pipeline in November - I have yet to see anything. > That being said, I do trust your capabilities and frankly believe > you. Can you give me a definitive number regarding a base that > will cover your monthly expenses? I will still have to juggle our > budget and see what is possible but at least I will have a starting > point. > > As for the key position in the firm enabling you better (higher) > access to customer - I have no issue with that. I agree that you > need a title that will allow you the credibility to get where you > need to go. > > Equity - A convertible debt round now looks imminent. With that > will come a restructuring of Unveillance where I will be able to > develop a clear compensation/option plans for the team. In that we > have not completely settled on a pre-money valuation (and will > continue to hold off until it is much clearer) it makes is > difficult to commit to what those plans will look like. Frankly, > your former employer has been responsible for the pre-money value > confusion! They certainly set the bar quite high and put > Unveillance in a very unique position. In the end, this will > benefit all involved with us but it will take a bit of time to > figure out. I have a third-part consultant working on our term > sheet and business plan which I will be happy to share with you > when I see you in DC. > > Timeline - As I mentioned above, I won't (and can't) have plans > drag beyond January. Not to infer that we will have gobs of money > by then, but I would like everything buttoned up to where I can > release the purse-strings a bit. I am not determined to keep you > all to myself and welcome the cross-pollination capabilities you > have with other firms. With that in mind, perhaps we could agree > on a time commitment and a fee/base for your efforts along side a > commission. If a full time position is we decide is best, then > depending on your monthly needs, a more permanent arrangement may > have to wait until I raise some funds. I would prefer not to wait > and get a tentative arrangement in place that we can restructure on > a liquidity event. > > Clearance - I think MITA will be very helpful in making sure you > have a good place to "park" your clearance should someone decide to > be spiteful. I have the capability to get a clearance but to date > have not so your status is a welcomed asset. > > I am in South Carolina at the moment and due to return to Atlanta > mid-week. Tentatively thinking of coming up to DC on the 18th. > At this point it seems my life will be weather-dictated! :) > > I will be happy to help you with getting a PGP install on your > Mac. It is slightly more involved than it is on a PC but simple > enough. Want to set a time up tomorrow with myself and my CTO, > Jerry Tubbs to do that? He has a Mac and knows first hand what to > do and can guide you step by step. > > Again John, I think we have a great potential together and I am > eager to work with you. I think the relationship with John W. is > key and should be simple to finalize. I want to make working with > Unveillance worth your while and satisfying as well as lucrative. > What was a frustrating period at EGS could turn out to be a > blessing with us. Thanks again for your time and let's figure this > out as soon as possible and get moving. Thank again. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNy5KAAoJEIk0Dw4U/G3lKUkH+wXw42U6d7Dp+K6IHplzKALi 2MmWzvQzuKN8fjLv4JV6qj658qjA6hzwDEfhXCMIBaUy9QlSCRnirQ/vubOMovLw klWCl2XvO73+3Nse2gWPpTelDESp8l9LSIIrNBrW1F1RLUckpjkWCmXSSl3+LgRP PLErIOwrcFYJ1v0Qi8byJW6Oaqf/TDs8Za1NO0vi6wP4jCWJE19hYgyXVSjQ78S5 MChecgYW1yubmbXAmEo7lGbkFG2Ozzhb+fUCuIOkrMhePBpTMog6aLbYOyz95t+/ mSvXtezD9bFGa/Pr5nIfdzJDv2EaNuGCabDE9Vf1eiwCUi+Wg6xtQZCPpM1+8wU= =Zewi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------010701040502080007040107 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -------- Original Message --------
Subject:     Re: Moving Forward
Date:     Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:57:58 -0500
From:     John Farrell <jmfarrell@yahoo.com>
To:     <khijazi@unveillance.com>

Karim,

Good morning. I met with Steve Noel, PhD from GMU on Monday. He's the lead
developer for the Cauldron program. He was the same person I talked to
about Endgames data over a year ago. He'll be the key person to help
integrate the Unveillance data. If you need any technical questions
resolved, I am sure John W will rely on him for support. He developed
their schema John can provide you with this standard).

On the subject of my position, I thought about this over the past couple
days. I completely understand your reservations. We don't have a long
relationship working together, so you don't have a track record of my
performance to make an informed decision. Likewise, I don't have the same
about you and your partners. However, I think we both think there's a
mutual benefit to working together and have many similar ideas. I believe
time will prove that we will make a great team. Like your equity in the
company,
my contacts and relationships are the equity I bring to the table. I am
reluctant
to just turn over all this information without some commitment. As you
say, they did a
"number" on me and it has caused me to be extremely conservative.

I would like to work out an "interim" deal with you that will:

1. Give you a chance to evaluate my performance
2. Give me a chance to understand the offering and how it will/can be sold
3. Provide you with enough time to negotiate funding and develop the
equity plan
4. Get me working on your behalf immediately and generating sales and
leads

Since you've already provided me with an initial agreement, I thought we
can discuss these components:

1. Base/retainer
2. Commission
3. Equity

Whiel I am evaluating all options, I need to balance the Unveillance
opportunity (and risk) against other positions I am considering (I am
holding off one company right now on their offer).

I am considering:
- - full time employment
- - 1099 for 2 or more companies
- - establishing my own company (this will take a bit of time)
- - other options

To give you some numbers to work with, I am seeking a total package that
puts me in this range:

1. $150-175K base (my base salary over the past year has been in this
range, plus benefits)
2. $100-150K commission (with no cap in the event I bring in a large deal)
3. Equity - depends on the company and the opportunity

If you would consider an interim agreement, we could start out with a
lower base/retainer and higher commission rate. I know it will take you
some time to work out the investors, but I am most interested in the
equity (this is the primary reason I would consider taking another risk on
a start up firm).

Since I have a limited timeframe to make a decision, I would appreciate
your feedback and thoughts. Hopefully this gives you some ideas and we can
certainly discuss alternatives.

Let me know when you have time to talk. I am available via cell phone and
Skype (jmfarrell83). Thanks!

John

On 1/10/11 12:49 PM, "Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email"
<khijazi@unveillance.com> wrote:

>
> John,
>
> Thanks for your email outlining your stance on a number of fronts.
> I was very helpful for me to understand where your head is
> regarding our potential working relationship. I will address each
> issue as you presented them in your former email:
>
> Unveillance - ProInfo:
>
> I do see a great synergy there and I think that is agreed upon
> across the board. We are now finalizing our API structure to
> accommodate other systems like Cauldron which works as a fantastic
> middle-ware for us and a "connector" to other locally installed
> devices and hardware. I have no doubt John Williams and I will be
> able to find an amiable structure for pricing and commissioning our
> collaborative sales. I think your idea about deal registration is
> excellent. It would be a great starting point for us to get
> comfortable with each other. I would like to get a copy of
> Cauldron but as I have indicated to both you and John W., I have
> budgeted down to the penny as of late and need to stick to my
> financial plans until I get some clarity with MITA and some other
> angel groups. I don't see this extending beyond this month. With
> regard to Hunt himself, I do see him as a part of Unveillance
> (board and advisory at minimum) money or not. I think you agree
> that there is no down side to that.
>
> John Farrell - Unveillance:
>
> I do see your point regarding a "commission-only" sales position.
> It sounds like EGS did a number on you and I can understand your
> apprehension. Inversely, I have also learned some lessons about
> compensating prior to some sort of proving period. This
> absolutely nothing personal but, as you can imagine, everyone
> claims they have the most elaborate Rolodex and connectivity in
> this solar system! I have tried to make it a point that I want to
> see it to believe it. I actually have that exact scenario in
> Unveillance today with a commission only sales executive that gave
> me a sterling pipeline in November - I have yet to see anything.
> That being said, I do trust your capabilities and frankly believe
> you. Can you give me a definitive number regarding a base that
> will cover your monthly expenses? I will still have to juggle our
> budget and see what is possible but at least I will have a starting
> point.
>
> As for the key position in the firm enabling you better (higher)
> access to customer - I have no issue with that. I agree that you
> need a title that will allow you the credibility to get where you
> need to go.
>
> Equity - A convertible debt round now looks imminent. With that
> will come a restructuring of Unveillance where I will be able to
> develop a clear compensation/option plans for the team. In that we
> have not completely settled on a pre-money valuation (and will
> continue to hold off until it is much clearer) it makes is
> difficult to commit to what those plans will look like. Frankly,
> your former employer has been responsible for the pre-money value
> confusion! They certainly set the bar quite high and put
> Unveillance in a very unique position. In the end, this will
> benefit all involved with us but it will take a bit of time to
> figure out. I have a third-part consultant working on our term
> sheet and business plan which I will be happy to share with you
> when I see you in DC.
>
> Timeline - As I mentioned above, I won't (and can't) have plans
> drag beyond January. Not to infer that we will have gobs of money
> by then, but I would like everything buttoned up to where I can
> release the purse-strings a bit. I am not determined to keep you
> all to myself and welcome the cross-pollination capabilities you
> have with other firms. With that in mind, perhaps we could agree
> on a time commitment and a fee/base for your efforts along side a
> commission. If a full time position is we decide is best, then
> depending on your monthly needs, a more permanent arrangement may
> have to wait until I raise some funds. I would prefer not to wait
> and get a tentative arrangement in place that we can restructure on
> a liquidity event.
>
> Clearance - I think MITA will be very helpful in making sure you
> have a good place to "park" your clearance should someone decide to
> be spiteful. I have the capability to get a clearance but to date
> have not so your status is a welcomed asset.
>
> I am in South Carolina at the moment and due to return to Atlanta
> mid-week. Tentatively thinking of coming up to DC on the 18th.
> At this point it seems my life will be weather-dictated! :)
>
> I will be happy to help you with getting a PGP install on your
> Mac. It is slightly more involved than it is on a PC but simple
> enough. Want to set a time up tomorrow with myself and my CTO,
> Jerry Tubbs to do that? He has a Mac and knows first hand what to
> do and can guide you step by step.
>
> Again John, I think we have a great potential together and I am
> eager to work with you. I think the relationship with John W. is
> key and should be simple to finalize. I want to make working with
> Unveillance worth your while and satisfying as well as lucrative.
> What was a frustrating period at EGS could turn out to be a
> blessing with us. Thanks again for your time and let's figure this
> out as soon as possible and get moving. Thank again.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNy5KAAoJEIk0Dw4U/G3lKUkH+wXw42U6d7Dp+K6IHplzKALi
2MmWzvQzuKN8fjLv4JV6qj658qjA6hzwDEfhXCMIBaUy9QlSCRnirQ/vubOMovLw
klWCl2XvO73+3Nse2gWPpTelDESp8l9LSIIrNBrW1F1RLUckpjkWCmXSSl3+LgRP
PLErIOwrcFYJ1v0Qi8byJW6Oaqf/TDs8Za1NO0vi6wP4jCWJE19hYgyXVSjQ78S5
MChecgYW1yubmbXAmEo7lGbkFG2Ozzhb+fUCuIOkrMhePBpTMog6aLbYOyz95t+/
mSvXtezD9bFGa/Pr5nIfdzJDv2EaNuGCabDE9Vf1eiwCUi+Wg6xtQZCPpM1+8wU=
=Zewi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------010701040502080007040107-- From - Sat May 21 19:26:24 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.0.191] (184-77-43-130.gar.clearwire-wmx.net [184.77.43.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x31sm8559258ana.29.2011.01.19.06.44.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:44:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> Disposition-Notification-To: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:44:34 -0500 From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email Reply-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Organization: Unveillance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Gray Subject: Fwd: RE: Trip to DC X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim is pressing to get fed piece in order. If that doesn't indicate his interest, I don't know what does. KH - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Trip to DC Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:13:31 +0000 From: James Hunt To: khijazi@unveillance.com I'd like to get the federal agreement in place, signed, etc. before we move forward. I realize that it could be overtaken by events if we find a more overarching approach to entire company participation but want to get the fed deal in place in the meantime. Does that make senses? Jim Jim Hunt, Managing Partner MITA Group, Inc. 703/338-6414 - cell 703/903-0201 - fax - -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:19 AM To: James Hunt Subject: Trip to DC Jim, I am planning my trip to DC next week sometime. I am also due to meet up with John Farrell as well. Let me know what times work for you. Thanks Jim. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNvjSAAoJEIk0Dw4U/G3lyjIIALuEuNQNJcUe089fiQieaZDX HSrSuuW2LjXRtJbo9JiV48uoOTqoeLL2HHNWhauPGn4wGJpIOQl7zGVKRiWATPw1 MYoSHMR3n5B3aDtf2+Mj3D4mn8ILIYDJfapGPTS2Si8xrhdYhVzzqSoPVhf87WC6 KF5YllocLgNgOnZfa/JKiD0eInE8YEoPB1+rX0Xs2XPZBsp+UsNcPEJHXp1em0oc TYhcxm/azrda9nZuYAYoVdveZ4yDqfyxMiZRe6iDa4ctXRimCR4ML0uclCGrEvZm AOZtqO1FavCUrU8r72xRz72P7CqTfxFyEkIq1zAjZYuRZYIvjnN65NXCXDarJ8Q= =xYCg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From - Sat May 21 19:26:25 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Delivered-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Received: by 10.223.97.65 with SMTP id k1cs130511fan; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:30:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.91.25.1 with SMTP id c1mr1111071agj.36.1295451011887; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:30:11 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from p3plsmtpa01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.82.90]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id 20si15490314ans.171.2011.01.19.07.30.11; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 72.167.82.90 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jeff@grayconsultingco.com) client-ip=72.167.82.90; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 72.167.82.90 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jeff@grayconsultingco.com) smtp.mail=jeff@grayconsultingco.com Received: (qmail 29867 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2011 15:30:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (174.49.68.158) by p3plsmtpa01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.90) with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2011 15:30:10 -0000 From: "Jeff Gray" To: "'Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email'" In-Reply-To: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> Subject: Read: RE: Trip to DC Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:29:57 -0500 Message-ID: <007501cbb7ed$bb4ba4a0$31e2ede0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0076_01CBB7C3.D2759CA0"; report-type=disposition-notification X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Acu352bJaos/AqhOSj6ctyM5pxbwnwABlEOE Return-Path: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0076_01CBB7C3.D2759CA0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0077_01CBB7C3.D2759CA0" ------=_NextPart_001_0077_01CBB7C3.D2759CA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Your message To: Jeff Gray Subject: Fwd: RE: Trip to DC Sent: 1/19/2011 9:44 AM was read on 1/19/2011 10:29 AM. ------=_NextPart_001_0077_01CBB7C3.D2759CA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Read: RE: Trip to DC

Your message

    To: Jeff Gray
    Subject: Fwd: RE: Trip to DC
    Sent: 1/19/2011 9:44 AM

was read on 1/19/2011 10:29 AM.

------=_NextPart_001_0077_01CBB7C3.D2759CA0-- ------=_NextPart_000_0076_01CBB7C3.D2759CA0 Content-Type: message/disposition-notification Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reporting-UA: grayconsultingco.com; Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Final-Recipient: rfc822;jeff@grayconsultingco.com Original-Message-ID: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> Disposition: manual-action/MDN-sent-automatically; displayed ------=_NextPart_000_0076_01CBB7C3.D2759CA0-- From - Sat May 21 19:26:25 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Delivered-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Received: by 10.223.97.65 with SMTP id k1cs130591fan; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:31:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.72.39 with SMTP id u39mr953249yba.416.1295451090891; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:31:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from p3plsmtpa01-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa01-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.82.83]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id q24si1668398yba.21.2011.01.19.07.31.30; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 72.167.82.83 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jeff@grayconsultingco.com) client-ip=72.167.82.83; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 72.167.82.83 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jeff@grayconsultingco.com) smtp.mail=jeff@grayconsultingco.com Received: (qmail 18879 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2011 15:31:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (174.49.68.158) by p3plsmtpa01-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.83) with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2011 15:31:29 -0000 From: "Jeff Gray" To: References: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> In-Reply-To: <4D36F8D2.9020006@unveillance.com> Subject: RE: RE: Trip to DC Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:31:16 -0500 Message-ID: <007c01cbb7ed$ea73a250$bf5ae6f0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Acu352bJaos/AqhOSj6ctyM5pxbwnwABloTQ Content-Language: en-us Yes. We need to think through how to proceed w/ Jim. -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:45 AM To: Jeff Gray Subject: Fwd: RE: Trip to DC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim is pressing to get fed piece in order. If that doesn't indicate his interest, I don't know what does. KH - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Trip to DC Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:13:31 +0000 From: James Hunt To: khijazi@unveillance.com I'd like to get the federal agreement in place, signed, etc. before we move forward. I realize that it could be overtaken by events if we find a more overarching approach to entire company participation but want to get the fed deal in place in the meantime. Does that make senses? Jim Jim Hunt, Managing Partner MITA Group, Inc. 703/338-6414 - cell 703/903-0201 - fax - -----Original Message----- From: Karim Hijazi Unveillance Email [mailto:khijazi@unveillance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:19 AM To: James Hunt Subject: Trip to DC Jim, I am planning my trip to DC next week sometime. I am also due to meet up with John Farrell as well. Let me know what times work for you. Thanks Jim. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNvjSAAoJEIk0Dw4U/G3lyjIIALuEuNQNJcUe089fiQieaZDX HSrSuuW2LjXRtJbo9JiV48uoOTqoeLL2HHNWhauPGn4wGJpIOQl7zGVKRiWATPw1 MYoSHMR3n5B3aDtf2+Mj3D4mn8ILIYDJfapGPTS2Si8xrhdYhVzzqSoPVhf87WC6 KF5YllocLgNgOnZfa/JKiD0eInE8YEoPB1+rX0Xs2XPZBsp+UsNcPEJHXp1em0oc TYhcxm/azrda9nZuYAYoVdveZ4yDqfyxMiZRe6iDa4ctXRimCR4ML0uclCGrEvZm AOZtqO1FavCUrU8r72xRz72P7CqTfxFyEkIq1zAjZYuRZYIvjnN65NXCXDarJ8Q= =xYCg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----