Then you must be embarrassed that the only IP = address with a problem in the NFL network was a 49er = address:-o

- Roger

410-340-5335

From: J. Tubbs = [mailto:jtubbs@unveillance.com] =
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 4:47 = PM
To: Roger@americansecuritychallenge.com
Cc: Karim = Hijazi
Subject: Re: Unveillance provisioning = email

Ah, very good. = Email has a very complacent level of levity at times of which it = is very difficult to get across underlying jokes. I am glad that = we are on the same page.

You are correct, it would be ironic = and sad at the same time to find a law firm with mass infection galore. = But, in all honesty it has been a trend of late that the bad guys = have been targeting law firms as they are presently a perfect target. = Most large law firms possess an unmeasurable amount of sensitive and personal = information while at the same time the majority of firms tend to have = less experienced and less robust security policies and enforcement, say, = compared to a large investment bank that in itself is seasoned in = dealing with constant spear phishing campaigns along with mass = infection.

You are spot on about the NFL needing to settle this dispute = ASAP. It's a PR nightmare for them as every professional sports = league has seen the fallout from a player holdout. I still believe = that baseball has not recovered 100% from it's 1995 strike and I don't think the NHL = will ever recover from its recent and ridiculous strike. If the = beginning of the season rolls around and they have yet to settle this = dispute then I think the NFL will suffer a massive amount of damage of = which it will never recover given the current economic challenges in = society today, it would be a perfect storm of failure for the NFL to not = get a product onto the field come = July/August.

As for a favorite team, I proudly yet painfully admit to be a = die-hard 49ers fan.

-J.

On May 6, 2011, at = 4:35 PM, Roger@americansecurit= ychallenge.com wrote:

No worries. I was = also only making a joke suggesting how funny it would be if you mapped = their lawyers network to find it Swiss cheesy = and buggy like a month old peach. Imagine fighting over the distribution = of 10 billion dollars and using an open network. That would be = ironic..

I hope they figure it out so nobody feels shafted and we get = back to football. U have a favorite = team?

Roger

Sent from my iPad

On May 6, 2011, = at 15:58, "J. Tubbs" <jtubbs@unveillance.com> = wrote:

I apologize, I was just making a joke = about the current bargaining agreement dispute. I was not = seriously inferring that their lawyer's offices would have any more or = any less infection potential than the entire NFL = network.

As for law firms representing the NFL, it appears that they use = quite a few in that they have issues from copyright infringement and = enforcement to litigation pertaining to this present bargaining = agreement dispute between the NFL and the NFLPA.

-J.

On May 6, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Roger London = wrote:

Do we know who thier lawyers r? Wonder = how secure that network is = ......?

Roger
Sent from my iPhone

On May 6, 2011, = at 15:46, "J. Tubbs" <jtubbs@unveillance.com> = wrote:
No problem.

They are pretty clean as they are busy spending more time in = their lawyer's offices than the NFL offices trying to resolve this = current bargaining agreement dispute with the players. = :)

-J.

On May 6, 2011, at = 3:43 PM, Roger wrote:

Got it = thanks

- Roger
410-340-5335
Roger@AmericanSecurit= yChallenge.com

From: J. Tubbs = [mailto:jtubbs@unveillance.com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 3:27 = PM
To: Roger = London
Cc: Karim = Hijazi
Subject: Re: Unveillance provisioning = email

Mr. London,
The NFL is in your client watchlist as of about 30 minutes = ago.

-J.
On May 6, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Roger London = wrote:

Great thank u. When = will I see that on my client watch list.

Roger
Sent from my = iPhone

On May 6, 2011, at 15:10, "J. = Tubbs" <jtubbs@unveillance.com> = wrote:
Mr. London,
Per network allocation it appears that the NFL has allocated a = /24 to each NFL team within it's own allocation which is = broken up into a /21 and a /19. So, the Ravens are covered = underneath the total NFL = mapping.

J. "oday" = Tubbs
CTO
Unveillance, LLC
www.unveillance.com
jtubbs@unveillance.com<= /u>

********************************************
CONFIDENT= IAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION This message is for the = named
person's use only. The information = contained in this communication is
confidential and/or privileged, = proprietary information that is
transmitted solely for the purpose of the = intended recipient(s). No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or = lost by any mistransmission.
If = you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it = and
all copies of it from your = system, destroy any hard copies of it and
notify the sender. You must not, = directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this = message if you are not the
intended recipient. The sender or any = of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail = communications through its = networks.
********************************************

On May 6, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Roger = wrote:

J.

My initial interest was in the ravens.nfl.net network, and then nfl.net as it is probably a network = provided to all teams including the ravens, and then nfl.com. thanks.

- Roger
410-340-5335
Roger@AmericanSecurit= yChallenge.com

From: J. Tubbs = [mailto:jtubbs@unveillance.com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:57 = PM
<= /div>
=

------=_NextPart_000_0033_01CC0C0D.C9C76D60-- From - Sat May 21 19:22:29 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Delivered-To: khijazi@unveillance.com Received: by 10.224.61.4 with SMTP id r4cs195125qah; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.156.225 with SMTP id m61mr5383009yhk.274.1304714808014; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-yi0-f45.google.com (mail-yi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z70si9949294yhc.256.2011.05.06.13.46.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 May 2011 13:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.218.45 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jtubbs@unveillance.com) client-ip=209.85.218.45; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.218.45 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jtubbs@unveillance.com) smtp.mail=jtubbs@unveillance.com Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so1572355yib.4 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.189.211 with SMTP id c59mr2896297yhn.41.1304714805971; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.75] (99-1-188-105.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net [99.1.188.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e30sm1653143yhn.32.2011.05.06.13.46.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 May 2011 13:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Unveillance provisioning email Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-7--9911306 From: "J. Tubbs" In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:46:43 -0400 Cc: Karim Hijazi Message-Id: References: <004201cc0bfb$d342f7e0$79c8e7a0$@com> <-280339341327754286@unknownmsgid> <016201cc0c20$ef094270$cd1bc750$@com> <295699A7-0BA7-4D35-A2BE-9994BDF98A43@unveillance.com> <6B6A4AB9-D2EB-4B66-B67B-596E81747CE1@americansecuritychallenge.com> <2B0FA1E1-F631-49C1-AB18-A88BBED0E21C@unveillance.com> <001101cc0c25$eccfb3e0$c66f1ba0$@com> <466EA0E4-B327-4403-8FA5-A3F4F67DEB19@unveillance.com> <8FAB0DFA-C8E6-4A09-A47E-F38E403A714F@americansecuritychallenge.com>

To: "Roger@americansecuritychallenge.com" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-7--9911306 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Ah, very good. Email has a very complacent level of levity at times of = which it is very difficult to get across underlying jokes. I am glad = that we are on the same page. You are correct, it would be ironic and sad at the same time to find a = law firm with mass infection galore. But, in all honesty it has been a = trend of late that the bad guys have been targeting law firms as they = are presently a perfect target. Most large law firms possess an = unmeasurable amount of sensitive and personal information while at the = same time the majority of firms tend to have less experienced and less = robust security policies and enforcement, say, compared to a large = investment bank that in itself is seasoned in dealing with constant = spear phishing campaigns along with mass infection. You are spot on about the NFL needing to settle this dispute ASAP. It's = a PR nightmare for them as every professional sports league has seen the = fallout from a player holdout. I still believe that baseball has not = recovered 100% from it's 1995 strike and I don't think the NHL will ever = recover from its recent and ridiculous strike. If the beginning of the = season rolls around and they have yet to settle this dispute then I = think the NFL will suffer a massive amount of damage of which it will = never recover given the current economic challenges in society today, it = would be a perfect storm of failure for the NFL to not get a product = onto the field come July/August. As for a favorite team, I proudly yet painfully admit to be a die-hard = 49ers fan. -J. On May 6, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Roger@americansecuritychallenge.com wrote: > No worries. I was also only making a joke suggesting how funny it = would be if you mapped their lawyers network to find it Swiss cheesy and = buggy like a month old peach. Imagine fighting over the distribution of = 10 billion dollars and using an open network. That would be ironic.. >=20 > I hope they figure it out so nobody feels shafted and we get back to = football. U have a favorite team? >=20 > Roger > Sent from my iPad >=20 > On May 6, 2011, at 15:58, "J. Tubbs" wrote: >=20 >> I apologize, I was just making a joke about the current bargaining = agreement dispute. I was not seriously inferring that their lawyer's = offices would have any more or any less infection potential than the = entire NFL network. >>=20 >> As for law firms representing the NFL, it appears that they use quite = a few in that they have issues from copyright infringement and = enforcement to litigation pertaining to this present bargaining = agreement dispute between the NFL and the NFLPA. >>=20 >> -J. >>=20 >> On May 6, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Roger London wrote: >>=20 >>> Do we know who thier lawyers r? Wonder how secure that network is = ......? >>>=20 >>> Roger >>> Sent from my iPhone >>>=20 >>> On May 6, 2011, at 15:46, "J. Tubbs" wrote: >>>=20 >>>> No problem. >>>>=20 >>>> They are pretty clean as they are busy spending more time in their = lawyer's offices than the NFL offices trying to resolve this current = bargaining agreement dispute with the players. :) >>>>=20 >>>> -J. >>>>=20 >>>> On May 6, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Roger wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Got it thanks >>>>> =20 >>>>> - Roger >>>>> 410-340-5335 >>>>> Roger@AmericanSecurityChallenge.com >>>>> =20 >>>>> =20 >>>>> From: J. Tubbs [mailto:jtubbs@unveillance.com]=20 >>>>> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 3:27 PM >>>>> To: Roger London >>>>> Cc: Karim Hijazi >>>>> Subject: Re: Unveillance provisioning email >>>>> =20 >>>>> Mr. London, >>>>> The NFL is in your client watchlist as of about 30 minutes ago. >>>>> =20 >>>>> -J. >>>>>=20 >>>>> On May 6, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Roger London wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Great thank u. When will I see that on my client watch list.=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Roger >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>=20 >>>>> On May 6, 2011, at 15:10, "J. Tubbs" = wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Mr. London, >>>>> Per network allocation it appears that the NFL has allocated a /24 = to each NFL team within it's own allocation which is broken up into a = /21 and a /19. So, the Ravens are covered underneath the total NFL = mapping. >>>>> =20 >>>>> J. "oday" Tubbs >>>>> CTO >>>>> Unveillance, LLC >>>>> www.unveillance.com >>>>> jtubbs@unveillance.com >>>>>=20 >>>>> ******************************************** >>>>> CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION This message is for the = named >>>>> person's use only. The information contained in this communication = is >>>>> confidential and/or privileged, proprietary information that is >>>>> transmitted solely for the purpose of the intended recipient(s). = No >>>>> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any = mistransmission. >>>>> If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it = and >>>>> all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it = and >>>>> notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, = disclose, >>>>> distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not = the >>>>> intended recipient. The sender or any of its subsidiaries each = reserve >>>>> the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its = networks. >>>>> ******************************************** >>>>> =20 >>>>> On May 6, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Roger wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> J. >>>>> =20 >>>>> My initial interest was in the ravens.nfl.net network, and then = nfl.net as it is probably a network provided to all teams including the = ravens, and then nfl.com. thanks. >>>>> =20 >>>>> - Roger >>>>> 410-340-5335 >>>>> Roger@AmericanSecurityChallenge.com >>>>> =20 >>>>> =20 >>>>> From: J. Tubbs [mailto:jtubbs@unveillance.com]=20 >>>>> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:57 PM >>=20 --Apple-Mail-7--9911306 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Ah, = very good. Email has a very complacent level of levity at times of = which it is very difficult to get across underlying jokes. I am = glad that we are on the same page.

You are correct, = it would be ironic and sad at the same time to find a law firm with mass = infection galore. But, in all honesty it has been a trend of late = that the bad guys have been targeting law firms as they are presently a = perfect target. Most large law firms possess an unmeasurable = amount of sensitive and personal information while at the same time the = majority of firms tend to have less experienced and less robust security = policies and enforcement, say, compared to a large investment bank that = in itself is seasoned in dealing with constant spear phishing campaigns = along with mass infection.

You are spot on = about the NFL needing to settle this dispute ASAP. It's a PR = nightmare for them as every professional sports league has seen the = fallout from a player holdout. I still believe that baseball has = not recovered 100% from it's 1995 strike and I don't think the NHL will = ever recover from its recent and ridiculous strike. If the = beginning of the season rolls around and they have yet to settle this = dispute then I think the NFL will suffer a massive amount of damage of = which it will never recover given the current economic challenges in = society today, it would be a perfect storm of failure for the NFL to not = get a product onto the field come = July/August.

As for a favorite team, I proudly = yet painfully admit to be a die-hard 49ers = fan.

-J.

On May 6, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Roger@americansecurity= challenge.com wrote:

No worries. I was also only making a joke = suggesting how funny it would be if you mapped their lawyers network to = find it Swiss cheesy and buggy like a month old peach. Imagine fighting = over the distribution of 10 billion dollars and using an open network. = That would be ironic..

I hope they figure it = out so nobody feels shafted and we get back to football. U have a = favorite team?

Roger
Sent from my iPad

On = May 6, 2011, at 15:58, "J. Tubbs" <jtubbs@unveillance.com> = wrote:

I = apologize, I was just making a joke about the current bargaining = agreement dispute. I was not seriously inferring that their = lawyer's offices would have any more or any less infection potential = than the entire NFL network.

As for law firms = representing the NFL, it appears that they use quite a few in that they = have issues from copyright infringement and enforcement to litigation = pertaining to this present bargaining agreement dispute between the NFL = and the = NFLPA.

-J.

On= May 6, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Roger London wrote:

Do we know who thier lawyers r? Wonder how = secure that network is ......?

Roger
Sent from my = iPhone

On May 6, 2011, at 15:46, "J. Tubbs" <jtubbs@unveillance.com> = wrote:

No = problem.

They are pretty clean as they are busy = spending more time in their lawyer's offices than the NFL offices trying = to resolve this current bargaining agreement dispute with the = players. :)

-J.

On May = 6, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Roger wrote:

- Roger

J. = Tubbs [mailto:jtubbs@unveillance.com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 = 3:27 PM
To: Roger = London
Cc: Karim = Hijazi
Subject: Re: Unveillance = provisioning email

Mr. = London,
The NFL is in your = client watchlist as of about 30 minutes = ago.
-J.
On May 6, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Roger London = wrote:
Great thank u. When will I see that on my client = watch list.

Roger
Sent from my = iPhone

On May 6, 2011, at 15:10, "J. Tubbs" <jtubbs@unveillance.com> = wrote:
Mr. = London,
Per network = allocation it appears that the NFL has allocated a /24 to each NFL team = within it's own allocation which is = broken up into a /21 and a /19. So, the Ravens are covered = underneath the total NFL mapping.

J. "oday" = Tubbs
CTO
Unveillance, LLC
jtubbs@unveillance.comperson's use only. The information = contained in this communication is
confidential and/or privileged, = proprietary information that is
transmitted solely for the purpose of = the intended recipient(s). No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or = lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message = in error, please immediately delete it and
all copies of it from your = system, destroy any hard copies of it and
notify the sender. You must not, = directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this = message if you are not the
intended recipient. The sender or = any of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail = communications through its = networks.
********************************************
On May = 6, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Roger wrote:

My initial interest = was in the ravens.nfl.net network, and then nfl.net as it is probably a network = provided to all teams including the ravens, and then nfl.com. thanks.
=
- Roger
Roger@AmericanSecurity= Challenge.com
J. Tubbs [mailto:jtubbs@unveillance.com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:57 = PM