BP execs meet with Obama, agree to $20B escrow fund.
Media coverage of top BP officials' meeting with President Obama, which included
the lead stories on all three network newscasts, credited the President with
compelling the company to agree to a $20 billion escrow fund for victims of the
Gulf oil spill. The AP
(6/17, Loven) reports, "The unending oil spill saga had yielded almost no good
news before this. Creation of the fund...is the first big success Obama has
been able to give to Gulf residents and the nation in the eight weeks since the
explosion."
The CBS Evening News (6/16, lead story, 3:50, Couric) reported, "He said
he was trying to find out whose behind to kick for that oil spill in the Gulf of
Mexico," and on Wednesday, the President "started at the top, calling BP's
senior executives on the White House carpet. By the time their face-to-face
meeting was over, BP had agreed to put $20 billion into a fund to pay victims of
the
spill."
ABC World News (6/16, lead story, 3:10, Sawyer) reported, "We all
imagined what it was like in the room today when for four hours, top officials
of BP negotiated with the White House. The result? BP agreed to set up a $20
billion fund." ABC (Tapper) added, "Sometimes for meetings such as these,
guests are allowed to come in through the side door discretely, but the White
House did not afford such a courtesy to BP executives. Some even called it a
perp walk. In what resembled a call to the principal's office, BP's top
executives were summoned to the White
House."
NBC Nightly News (6/16, lead story, 3:30, Holt) reported, "The Chairman
of British Petroleum was called to the carpet today by...Obama, who promptly
handed him the bill for the Gulf oil disaster." NBC (Guthrie) added, "The
Chairman of BP opened this meeting by apologizing. He then had a private
meeting in the Oval Office with the President, but there was no private meeting
for the BP CEO Tony Hayward, the man the President has suggested he would have
fired."
The New York
Times (6/17, Calmes, Cooper) reports that "bowing to pressure from the
Obama administration," BP "also said it would suspend paying dividends to its
shareholders for the rest of the year and would compensate oil field workers for
lost
wages."
Politico
(6/17, Lee, Thrush, Marr) reports that "Carol Browner, Obama's energy adviser,
suggested the White House had no legal authority to force BP to pay lost wages.
'There's a very significant legal question about their liability,' Browner told
reporters."
The Washington
Post (6/17, A1, Wilson, Achenbach) notes that "speaking to reporters in
the State Dining Room of the White House...Obama called the agreement 'a good
start' that will reassure 'the people and small businesses I was talking to in
the Gulf that BP will meet its responsibilities.'" The Post adds that "Attorney
General Eric H. Holder Jr. also participated in much of the session, a sign of
the potential criminal liability the oil company may
face."
Feinberg named to administrate BP fund.
The New York
Times (6/17, Stolberg) reports, "Kenneth R. Feinberg bristled when
reporters dubbed him the compensation czar for his Treasury Department job
monitoring executive pay at companies that received government bailouts. The
term, he lamented to ABC News last year, 'makes it sound like I'm going to issue
some imperial decree.'" Yesterday, he was named by the President "Obama as the
independent administrator of a $20 billion fund set up by BP to compensate
victims of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico." While he "may not have the
powers of a king...he does seem to specialize in Solomon-like
decisions."
Separate $100M fund negotiated before Obama joined meeting.
McClatchy
(6/17, Thomma, Talev) reports, "The announcements followed an extraordinary
meeting that took on the air of a summit, with lawyers for both sides
negotiating in advance before Obama and his top advisers sat down across a long
table from BP executives in the White House Roosevelt Room." Adds McClatchy,
"One such scripted moment worked out beforehand: that Obama would ask for, and
get, a pledge from BP to set aside $100 million in a separate fund to compensate
oil rig workers left jobless by Obama's moratorium on some oil drilling in the
Gulf, pending new safety
reviews."
Noting the separate fund, the New York
Times (6/17, Calmes, Cooper) reports that the "company initially
resisted compensating those workers because the moratorium was not its
decision."
Final bill for BP unknown.
NBC Nightly News (6/16, story 3, 1:55, Faber) said, "as long as that oil
continues to come out of the Gulf of Mexico, we simply have no certainty what
the ultimate bill is going to be for BP or for that matter for all the companies
that do business in that area." Under the headline "BP's Shareholders Take It
On The Chin," the New
York Times (6/17, Hauser) asks, "Just how big is this oil spill,
really? For BP shareholders, about $88 billion big -- and growing. That is
roughly how much money investors have lost on paper as the oil giant's share
price has plunged." And "BP is so big, and its stock is so widely held, that
its troubles are being felt throughout the investment world." The Financial
Times (6/17, Crooks) reports that it may take BP a long time to reach a
deal limiting its
liability.
Criminal charges could dramatically increase costs for BP.
The New York
Times (6/17, Schwartz) reports that as BP "watches its bill rise
quickly for the oil spill, including $20 billion it is setting aside for claims,
it could find the tally growing much faster in coming months if the United
States Department of Justice files criminal charges against the company." Under
the "latest estimates, for example, the daily civil fine for the escaping oil
alone could be $280 million," but "criminal penalties, if imposed, could cause
the costs to balloon still further, said David M. Uhlmann, a law professor at
the University of Michigan, who headed the environmental crimes section of the
Justice Department from 2000 to
2007."
Administration's right to determine BP's liability questioned.
The Christian
Science Monitor (6/16, Cook) reported on its website that during "a
Monitor-sponsored lunch" yesterday, ex-House Majority Leader Dick Armey "sharply
criticized President Obama's approach to dealing with the massive oil spill in
the Gulf." Armey said, "The Constitution does not envision the president of the
United States saying that 'I will decide what compensations, what redress will
be elicited from a British-owned company.' There are courts for this purpose.
My own view is that the Constitution is far ahead of the game compared to where
this president is with his current fulminations about what he will decide about
whose butt to
kick."
In a blog at The
Atlantic (6/16), Chris Good wrote, "There is a case to be made...for
why BP shouldn't be made to pay." It is "simply this: laws should generally be
followed, or at least treated seriously by the bodies that make them, otherwise
laws in general are meaningless, as is the process by which they are made." If
"Congress retroactively eliminates the liability cap for BP--in preemption of
the escrow fund not being enough, or (perhaps more likely) as a PR stunt by
congressional Democrats wishing to appear proactive and heavy handed--Congress
will have, in no uncertain terms, changed the
rules."
Blogger concerned over potential fraud linked to fund.
In the "On the Docket" blog at Forbes
(6/16), Daniel Fisher wrote that the fund's creation "shoves the ever-spreading
Gulf spill firmly out of what we know about traditional tort law and into the
strange world of mass torts like asbestos, fen-phen and Vioxx." Any fund "that
big...raises the specter of the massive fraud, fake claims, bloated legal bills
and insider dealing that have marked other tort settlements. Vanderbilt Law
School's Richard Nagareda thinks and writes a lot about these issues and he's
concerned that the BP escrow account could go the way of asbestos bankruptcy
trusts, with the same lawyers who are pressing claims controlling the processing
of
same."
NYTimes urges Obama not to trust BP.
The New York
Times (6/17) editorializes that "there are a lot of reasons, of course,
not to trust BP," and "the White House will need to keep pressing BP hard. ...
We would like to think the battle is over. It is not. Claims in the 1989 Exxon
Valdez case were not finally adjudicated until two years ago, and there is still
oil on the rocks of Prince William
Sound."
Attorney whose son died on oil rig pushes for reform of DOHSA.
In an op-ed in CNN
(6/16), attorney Keith Jones, whose son Gordon died on the Deepwater Horizon,
wrote, "Gordon's older brother Chris and I are directing all our energies to try
to make right an outdated law that would deprive my daughter-in-law, Michelle,
and her two boys, my grandsons, of 'more nearly fair compensation' for the loss
of their husband and father." In "a system that is imperfect, the Death on the
High Seas Act stands alone in the draconian way it limits the recovery of
damages for wrongful deaths on the high seas." Senate Bill 3463, "introduced by
Sen. Patrick Leahy; and House Resolution 5503, by chairman of the Judiciary
Committee and Rep. John Conyers, seek to address the inequities of DOHSA" by
allowing the recovery of "non-pecuniary damages." In addition, "Sen. Sheldon
Whitehouse has introduced Senate Bill 3345, which simply provides that in
computing punitive damages in maritime cases, the amount of compensatory damages
is not to be
considered."
BP engages second oil containment system.
The New York
Times (6/17, Robbins, Gillis) reports BP "on Wednesday began collecting
crude oil from a second containment system that the company hopes will help stem
the thousands of barrels escaping from their damaged well in the Gulf of Mexico,
an amount that scientists said could be as high as 60,000 barrels a day." The
company is "siphoning the oil through a series of pipes and hoses to a ship, the
Q4000, which will then clean and burn the oil and gas mixture in a processing
device called an EverGreen burner." The method BP "has been using since June 3
- a containment cap - has been able to collect about 15,000 barrels of crude oil
a day. But based on new estimates of the flow rate released on Tuesday, that may
be only about one quarter of the amount leaking
daily."
Sludge disposal another challenge for BP.
USA
Today (6/17, Levin) reports BP is "facing a huge new challenge in
disposing of the millions of gallons of potentially toxic oil sludge its crews
are collecting from the Gulf of Mexico, according to industry experts and
veterans of past spills." Crews "so far have skimmed and sucked up 21.1 million
gallons of oil mixed with water," and "because the out-of-control well may
continue spewing for months, that total almost certainly will surge." BP's
"plan for handling the gooey mess, written in conjunction with the Coast Guard,
the Environmental Protection Agency and Louisiana officials, calls for
reclaiming or recycling as much as possible." But some experts said while "that
approach is the best option for the environment...it has not worked in previous
spills."
CDC says BP is failing to provide list of cleanup workers.
CQ
HealthBeat (6/17, Norman) reports, "One of the main elements of the
response" to the Gulf Coast oil spill by the CDC "is to develop a roster of
workers involved in cleaning up the spill caused by the explosion of BP's
Deepwater Horizon rig April 20." With this, the government "would be able to
track workers' health and any symptoms or illnesses for years to come, and try
to determine if those health problems are related to the spill." Yet, "John
Howard, director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health at
CDC, told" the House Health Subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce panel "that
the agency several times has requested from BP a complete list of workers,
without result. He said he doesn't know why BP has not
responded."
Experts say spill is taking psychological toll on people in the region.
The New York
Times (6/17, A19, Navarro) reports, "Beyond the environmental and
economic damage, the toll of the mammoth spill in the Gulf of Mexico is being
measured in hopelessness, anxiety, stress, anger, depression, and even suicidal
thoughts among those most affected, social workers say." In fact, "Catholic
Charities reported this week that of the 9,800 people the counselors had
approached since May 1 in Orleans, St. Bernard and Plaquemines Parishes, 1,593
were referred for counseling because of signs of depression." Meanwhile,
"officials with the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals said staff
members had counseled 749 people in the last week of May and the first week of
June to 'mitigate' symptoms that could lead to destructive
behavior."
AFP
(6/17, Montet) notes, "State health authorities 'are anticipating that the
longer-term stressors and economic consequences of this disaster could lead to
an increase in depression, substance use and abuse, family violence, high risk
behavior, suicide,' Department of Health and Human Services deputy assistant
secretary Lisa Kaplowitz told lawmakers." Dr. Aubrey Keith Miller, senior
medical adviser to the NIH, "told the committee the oil nearest the source of
the spill 'can cause acute toxicity as well as longer-term health effects such
as cancer, birth defects and neurological
effects.'"
Interior Department Inspector General criticizes MMS probe of spill.
The Washington
Post (6/17, Eilperin) reports Interior Department's acting inspector
general Mary L. Kendall is expected to tell the House Natural Resources
Committee that "elected officials should consider imposing ethics rules on oil
and gas companies that do business with the federal government." Kendall will
"also tell the panel that the Minerals Management Agency, which oversees
offshore oil drilling, is probing the BP oil spill in a 'completely backwards'
way and needs to have its culture
revamped."