Obama meets with fallen rig workers' families.
President Obama's meeting with the families of the 11 Deepwater Horizon workers
killed April 20 is covered prominently in this morning's papers, and was
reported by all three network newscasts last night. ABC World News
(6/10, story 2, 1:05, Stephanopoulos) reported, "At the White House today,
President Obama met with the families of the 11 men killed in the April
explosion. The President promised them their loved ones would not be
forgotten." Sheila Clark, widow of Donald Clark: "We don't want the government
to stop until they find out exactly what happened out there, because we really
don't know what
happened."
The CBS Evening News (6/10, story 2, 1:05, Couric) reported, "We
shouldn't forget that 11 people were killed when the oil rig the 'Deepwater
Horizon' exploded on April 20. Today, members of their family met with the
President at the White House." CBS (Reid) added, "We're told the President
talked to each family individually, offered his condolences and said he will be
there for them long after the cameras are
gone."
According to NBC Nightly News (6/10, lead story, 3:30, Williams), the
President "tried to heal the most painful wounds, meeting with the families of
the men who died on the oil rig." Keith Jones, father of Gordon Jones: "I don't
criticize the President in not having condemned BP or any other party that may
have been at fault in the accident. Not
yet."
The AP
(6/11, Superville) says the President and First Lady were "joined by Interior
Secretary Ken Salazar, White House energy adviser Carol Browner, senior adviser
Valerie Jarrett and Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen." The AP notes, "One man who
lost a son asked Obama to support efforts to update federal law limiting the
amount of money the families can
collect."
Keith Jones, the father of a victim of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig accident,
on MSNBC's the Ed Show (6/10), said his meeting with the president "went
very well." Jones said, "The president was very gracious and very generous with
his time. ... Well, there's no question in my mind that he's emotionally touched
by this [oil
disaster]."
OSHA official details energy industry's recent fatal accidents.
McClatchy
(6/11, Blumenthal) reports, "The oil and gas industry has a troubling record on
worker safety, a congressional subcommittee was told Thursday. ... In the past
four months, 58 workers have died in explosions, fires and collapses at
refineries, coal mines, the oil drilling rig and a natural gas-fired power plant
construction site, said Jordan Barab, deputy assistant secretary for the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration." Sen. Patty Murray, chair of the
Employment and Workplace Safety Subcommittee of the Senate HELP Committee, said,
"To me this doesn't seem simply like a string of bad luck; it appears to be a
disregard for safety regulations and precautions across an entire
industry."
Lawmakers hold hearings to consider health impact of oil spill.
The
Hill (6/11, Lillis, Pecquet) reports, "After focusing for weeks on the
causes of the Gulf oil spill and its economic and environmental impact, Congress
shifted its attention Thursday to the dangers it poses to human health."
Notably, the "Senate Health Committee tackled proposals to protect oil industry
workers, while the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Energy panel heard from
experts on potential problems associated with exposure to oil, a
carcinogen."
Boehner blasts wave of spill hearings.
The
Hill (6/11, Hooper) reports House minority leader John Boehner "is
ripping congressional hearings into the BP oil spill. 'This is Congress at its
best,' said Boehner at the beginning of a rant on the dozens of House and Senate
hearings on the oil spill. 'Why don't we get the oil stopped, figure out what
the hell went wrong, and then have the hearings and get the damn law fixed,'
Boehner said at his weekly press conference on
Thursday."
Lawyers seek potential plaintiffs in suits against BP.
The New York
Times (6/11, Schwartz) reports on the "tactics lawyers are using to
sign up clients to sue BP," including putting up billboard ads, "running
advertisements on Gulf Coast television stations, buying Internet addresses like
GulfOilSpillLawFirm.com, and holding informational seminars -- with free food
and drinks -- for those who feel the oil company owes them something."
According to the Times, "Lawyers across the nation have filed nearly 200
lawsuits so far related to the April 20 oil disaster, including death and injury
claims for those aboard the rig, claims of damage and economic loss for people
whose livelihoods are threatened by the slick, and shareholder suits over BP's
plunging stock. ... Lawyers also plan to file a civil racketeering action
alleging a corporate conspiracy with the Bush
administration."
Global shareholder lawsuit filed against BP.
The National
Law Journal (6/10, Baldas) reported, "Another shareholder lawsuit has
been filed against BP PLC over the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, this one
potentially involving plaintiffs from all around the world. The suit, filed
Tuesday by New York's Zwerling, Schachter & Zwerling in the Eastern District of
Louisiana, seeks to represent not just American investors but also those who
bought shares in London-based BP in the United Kingdom and throughout the rest
of the
world."
Experts unsure of extent of BP's liability.
The Wall
Street Journal (6/9, Catan, Searcey) reports that on Thursday, the
White House said it might seek new laws to force BP to compensate workers idled
by halted deepwater drilling. But legal experts have disagreed on whether such
a move would be possible, as well as on whether BP can be ordered to halt
dividend
payments.
CNN
(6/10, Segal) reported that Transocean has invoked the Limitation of Liability
Act of 1851 "to limit its liability to $26.76 million, a fraction of what the"
families of workers killed in the rig explosion "are likely to seek." The
"pre-emptive strike is part of the legal thicket confronting victims, where a
patchwork of arcane and sometimes inconsistent laws will most likely make the
ensuing litigation one of the most complex cases in American history." Lawyers
for the victims "will argue that Transocean officials had enough of what the
1851 law calls "privity or knowledge" to hold the company responsible for the
full value of the death and injury
claims."
Liability arguments explored.
In an op-ed in the National
Law Journal (6/14), Brian B. O'Neill of Faegre & Benson writes,
"Various commentators, public officials and BP PLC representatives have stated
repeatedly that there is a $75 million damages cap for the BP Gulf of Mexico oil
spill. Nothing could be further from the truth." O'Neill discusses exceptions
to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as well as counterarguments to potential BP
defenses involving the Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 and "the Robins Dry
Dock doctrine." O'Neill also observes that "state law punitive damages still
exist for all Gulf Coast states other than Louisiana and plaintiffs should sue
under state law for
punitives."
BP pledges to expedite claims process.
USA
Today (6/11) notes the Administration "announced" BP "agreed to speed
up payments" after officials "raised a 'pressing concern' with BP officials
during a Wednesday meeting about the time the company is taking to provide
relief
payments."
The Washington
Post (6/11, Branigin, Hedgpeth) reports BP "has agreed to implement a
more transparent and expedited claims process to pay individuals and businesses
harmed by the disaster." Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen "told reporters that he
and other administration officials met with BP representatives Wednesday at his
request to talk about claims issues." Tracy Wareing, "a top DHS official," said
BP "promised to 'implement a more expedited claims process' that takes into
account the ability of businesses to pay expenses for the upcoming month and the
issue of seasonal
earnings."
According to the Washington
Post (6/11, Stephens, Flaherty), "State officials in Louisiana, which
accounts for more than half of the claims to date, say they also have been
unimpressed with BP's assertions in national ads that it will pay 'all
legitimate claims.' They complain that BP executives have refused to give
details of payments and instead have provided only a brief daily 'event
summary.' Last week, Louisiana Attorney General James D. 'Buddy' Caldwell
resorted to legal action, demanding details in a
lawsuit."
In a separate article, USA
Today (6/11, Schmit) also reports that Louisiana and Florida officials
"say the payouts, so far, have been small and often too slow and that BP hasn't
given them the data they need to adequately monitor the process. The Obama
administration has also stepped up pressure on BP to make the process faster and
more transparent, and to make more data available to public officials so they
can monitor
claims."
Pete Spotts, writing for the Christian
Science Monitor (6/11), says, "Business owners in the Gulf are
increasingly unhappy with what many see as a claims process tripping over its
own red tape. ... BP appears to be learning about regionwide claims management
on the fly, just as it was learning about containing oil flowing from its
ruptured undersea well on the
fly."
BP's ability to survive disaster in question.
ABC World News (6/10, lead story, 3:40, Stephanopoulos) reported, "And
with these troubling new numbers today come new questions about whether BP will
be able to pay for it all. The company's stock fluctuating wildly. BP
shareholders worry that the company will drown in claims, by some estimates,
owing $14 billion to the people of the
Gulf."
New estimate: as many as 40K barrels of oil leaking daily.
ABC World News (6/10, lead story, 3:40, Stephanopoulos) reported, "The
Federal body President Obama charged with figuring out how big the oil spill is
now has an official estimate, and it is stunning. Government scientists now say
between 20,000 and 40,000 barrels of oil have been gushing out every day.
That's 40 times the original estimate, and independent experts say it could go
even
higher."
Report suggests spill estimates were intentionally lowballed.
NBC Nightly News (6/10, lead story, 3:30, Williams) reported, "There are
also new questions being raised tonight about what some government officials
knew early on about this blowout and the potential for massive amounts of oil in
the water as compared to what was said and understood at the time." NBC
Nightly News (6/10, story 9, 3:40, Williams) went on to report that the new
disclosures "raise questions about whether some in the government leveled with
the public about the possible worst-case scenario." NBC's Lisa Myers added,
"Within hours after the Deepwater Horizon rig sank into the ocean on April 22nd,
this behind-the-scenes video captured" NOAA scientists "participating in a
conference call," and "clearly written on this board was what the White House
now says was a worst-case scenario at that time, that 64,000 to 110,000 barrels
of oil a day could leak into the gulf." However, "Initially, the Coast Guard
official in charge," Rear Adm. Mary Landry, "quoted BP's estimate that the well
was leaking 1,000 barrels a day." Timothy Crone, Lamont-Doherty Earth
Observatory: "It certainly seems that there might have been an effort to
minimize these numbers." NBC noted that the White House "emphatically denies
there was ever any attempt to minimize the size of the
leak."
Wildlife fatality reports spike.
ABC World News (6/10, story 3, 2:10, Gutman) reported, "Just over the
past week, there have been twice as many birds brought to this wildlife refuge
in Louisiana as in the past six weeks combined. Today, twice as many dead birds
to that same refuge as in the past
day."
Top BP officials to meet with Obama next Wednesday.
Politico
(6/11, Gerstein) reports, "Ending days of speculation and criticism about why
the president has not met or spoken with top officials of the company
responsible for the oil spill off the Gulf Coast, the White House Thursday
invited BP's chairman of the board and other senior managers to meet with Barack
Obama in Washington next week. ... The invitation for the meeting...comes after
repeated questions from reporters this month about why, more than 50 days after
the spill began, Obama hasn't had a face-to-face encounter or phone conversation
with the company's top
leaders."
BP pressured to withhold dividend payment.
The CBS Evening News (6/10, story 4, 2:00, Phillips) reported, "The cost
to BP of trying to cap the spill and clean up the mess have driven its share
price down by about $90 billion, a loss of about 47% of its pre-spill total
value. And now BP, which accounts for 12% of all British stock dividends is
being pressured not to pay its next dividend until the spill is
stopped."