If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view.
AAJ News Brief for Haytham Faraj | Tuesday, March 23, 2010 |
|
|
Leading the News
Georgia High Court strikes down cap on medical malpractice awards.
The Atlanta
Journal-Constitution (3/23, Rankin) reports, "A unanimous Georgia
Supreme Court on Monday struck down limits on jury awards in medical malpractice
cases," ruling that the
$350,000 cap on noneconomic damages violates the right to a jury trial
guaranteed by the Georgia Constitution, as the cap "'clearly nullifies the
jury's findings of fact regarding damages and thereby undermines the jury's
basic function,' Chief Justice Carol Hunstein wrote for the
court."
The AP
(3/23, Bluestein) reports that the ruling "will likely herald a flurry of new
litigation, as the court said the ruling applied retroactively to all other
pending medical-malpractice cases, including those that are now in the appeals
process." In the case before the court, Betsy Nestlehutt "was awarded $1.15
million in non-economic damages -- including $900,000 in pain and suffering --
by a Fulton County jury after she was permanently disfigured after a botched
facelift."
The New York
Times (3/23, A19, Brown) reports, "The ruling was praised by victims'
rights groups and plaintiffs' lawyers and was condemned by doctors and
Republican
lawmakers."
The Fulton
County Daily Report (3/23, Palmer) reports, "Atlanta lawyer R. Adams
'Adam' Malone of Malone Law, who represents the plaintiffs in Monday's case,
expressed gratitude for the unanimous nature of the
ruling."
From the American Association for
Justice |
AAJ Education's Litigating
Medical Negligence and Injured Infant Cases Seminar, April 9-10 in Las
Vegas, is packed with the latest medical developments and trial techniques
you need to successfully litigate medical negligence and injured infant cases.
You'll get direct access to AAJ's experienced faculty which includes lawyers in
this practice area and prominent medical experts. They will share proven
strategies that will help you obtain justice for your clients. To view the
agenda and register, visit Continuing Legal Education. AAJ has introduced two
new monthly electronic newsletters! The Class Action Law Reporter
and the Motor Vehicle Law Reporter contain news, verdicts and
settlements, court opinions, links to recent journal articles, and more. They
are available by subscription to members of certain sections and litigation
groups in those practice areas. Subscribe now. The AAJ Exchange's recently updated
Avandia Litigation Packet provides an overview of Avandia and its
link to heart attacks and other cardiovascular events, pending state court
actions, multidistrict litigation, and congressional hearings. Sample
court documents include client intake materials, questionnaires, and
complaints. To order or view the table of contents for this or the more
than 130 other Litigation Packets, visit the AAJ
Exchange or call 1-800-344-3023. The Motor Vehicle Collision,
Highway, and Premises Liability Section focuses on auto collision cases,
truck safety, highway design, and premises liability. The Section also provides
discussion of federal no-fault issues. In addition, the Section offers a list
server, quarterly newsletter, networking, referral opportunities, and much more.
To learn about our 18 Sections and join, visit Sections. |
|
|
AAJ in the News
Blogger says link between tort reform, health care savings is unclear.
In a blog at the Cleveland
Plain Dealer (3/20), Stephen Koff wrote, "five years after a difficult
but successful fight in Columbus to pass tort reform, health-care costs in the
state have not gone down. And health policy analysts say it may not be possible
to say whether costs would have spiked even higher had Ohio not passed lawsuit
reform." The American Association for Justice, "a trade group that represents
trial lawyers, notes...that while health insurance premiums in Ohio rose more
slowly than the national average, the Ohio pace still outstripped the hikes in
neighboring Kentucky. And Kentucky did not put caps in malpractice verdicts, so
tort reform could not explain its
savings."
American Express Open Forum | Advertisement |
|
Civil Justice System
SCOTUS to hear prosecutorial immunity case.
The National
Law Journal (3/23, Mauro) reports, "The Supreme Court agreed on Monday
to rule on a Louisiana dispute that could be an important test of prosecutorial
immunity in a death penalty case. In Connick v. Thompson, the 5th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court verdict that awarded accused murderer
John Thompson $14 million for the district attorney's failure to train its
lawyers about so-called Brady violations, a failure that led to his wrongful
conviction and death sentence in 1985. Current Orleans Parish District Attorney
Leon Cannizaro Jr. appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, asserting that
upholding the 5th Circuit's decision 'exposes district attorney's offices to
vicarious liability for a wide range of prosecutorial
misconduct.'"
The AP
(3/22) reported, "Prosecutors ordinarily may not be sued for their official
actions. The high court underscored that point last year when it held that a
California man who spent 24 years in prison after being wrongly convicted could
not sue the former Los Angeles district
attorney."
New York City settles strip-search class-action for $33M.
The AP
(3/22) reported, "Two women who claimed they were forced to undergo
gynecological exams and thousands of other people who said they were
strip-searched in New York City jails have settled a class-action lawsuit with
the city for $33 million. The suit was filed on behalf of people arrested on
misdemeanor drug and weapons charges and strip-searched at Rikers Island and
other jails." Under the agreement, "victims can receive between $1,800 and
$2,900 each, depending on how many people
respond."
Texas couple fails to reach settlement in mediation with Perry Homes.
The AP
(3/22) reported, "Mediation efforts were unsuccessful Monday between an elderly
Fort Worth-area couple and the politically powerful Houston homebuilder who lost
a $58 million judgment to them, the couple's lawyers said. Van Shaw and Dan
Hagood, attorneys for Robert and Jane Cull of Mansfield, said they failed to
reach an agreement with lawyers for Perry Homes owner Bob Perry, once considered
one of the nation's largest political donors. A Fort Worth judge had ordered the
mediation to avoid appeals after the $58 million verdict against Perry and a
home warranty company earlier this
month."
McGuireWoods challenges elimination of attorney's fees based on class representative incentives.
The
Recorder (3/23, Bronstad) reports, "Plaintiffs' lawyers who obtained a
$49 million settlement in an antitrust class action against the parent company
of BARBRI are gearing up for another fight before the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court
of Appeals - this time, involving their attorneys fees. Class counsel
McGuireWoods, which settled the litigation in 2007, filed a notice of appeal on
March 8 after U.S. District Judge Manuel Real of the Central District of
California eliminated all the firm's attorneys fees over an apparent conflict of
interest." The appeals "challenge Real's Feb. 3 finding that McGuireWoods
violated the California Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to inform class
members about an agreement that gave incentive awards to five class
representatives based on the value of the
settlement."
Washington, DC married lawyers sue over protestors' rights.
The Washington
Post (3/23, Labbé-DeBose) reports, "When Carl Messineo and Mara
Verheyden-Hilliard sued the District on behalf of hundreds of protesters
arrested by D.C. police, their strategy all along was to do more than win a
large settlement for the demonstrators. They wanted to teach the city a lesson."
The Post profiles Messineo and Verheydne-Hilliard, who are married, commenting
that their "tedious approach to assembling facts is a staple of their
three-person law practice, the Partnership for Civil Justice, and reflects a
deeper personal passion to defend the Constitution and create social
change."
Congress
Obama to kick off campaign to promote new healthcare law.
House approval of the healthcare reform measure is receiving extensive, and
largely positive media coverage, including the lead stories on all three network
newscasts. A majority of stories describe the bill in positive terms, and cast
its passage as a big victory for Democrats in general -- and for the President
and Speaker Pelosi in particular. NBC Nightly News (3/22, lead story,
3:30, Williams) said in its lead story that the measure "will improve the
healthcare of millions of Americans." NBC (Guthrie) added that Democrats are
"basking in their victory," and on Monday "worked to place the vote among the
nation's legislative landmarks, civil rights, social security, the Speaker
clutching the gavel used at the passage of Medicare." The President will sign
the bill on Tuesday, "then travel to Iowa on Thursday for a rally to sell it."
On Monday, "the President's top political adviser David Axelrod said the
President was actually more excited last night than on his own election
night."
ABC World News (3/22, lead story, 2:30, Tapper) also noted the exchange
between Axelrod and the President: "'When you win the presidency,' he told
Axelrod 'it's like the semi finals, but the goal is to get to a place where you
can really make a difference.'" The President, says the CBS Evening News
(3/22, story 2, 3:15, Smith), "put just about everything on the line to get
health reform through: his presidency and his party's future." CBS (Reid)
added that this "is not the end of the road for healthcare reform for the
President. In fact, it's really the beginning of a brand-new campaign of trying
to convince a skeptical American public that passing healthcare reform was the
right thing to
do."
Senate GOP hoping to derail health bill's reconciliation process.
NBC Nightly News (3/22, story 2, 1:00, O'Donnell) reported that "the
President can sign the bill, he can go out and sell it, but that doesn't mean
it's actually over. Why? House Democrats did a lot of rewriting on the health
reforms that were just passed so the Senate must approve those for them to take
effect. This is called reconciliation. Senate Republicans have a strategy to
try to strip out whole sections of the bill and they can offer dozens of
amendments, even some appealing to Democrats. If they succeed even once it goes
back to the House for another vote." In fact, Roll
Call (3/23, Drucker) reports, "a senior Republican Senate aide" said
"Republicans are 'virtually certain' there are flaws in the Democrats' strategy
that can be exploited to thwart the majority party's plan for wrapping up health
care legislation within the next few days." Like ABC, Roll Call also says that
"the GOP hopes, at a minimum, to force the House to vote again on the
measure."
Obama lauds Senate banking panel approval of financial regulatory bill.
The AP
(3/23) reports, "President Barack Obama is praising the Democrats' massive Wall
Street regulation bill as it heads to the full Senate." The bill was approved
by the "Senate Banking Committee...along party lines on Monday." Obama stated
that "the nation is 'one step closer' to passing financial reform that he
contends will bring oversight and accountability to the US financial
system."
Drug Safety
FDA asks physicians to suspend use of Rotarix due to contamination.
The New York
Times (3/23, Harris) reports that the FDA "on Monday asked the nation's
pediatricians to stop giving children" Rotarix, a vaccine used to protect
against rotavirus, "until federal scientists can figure out why the product
contains apparently harmless but extraneous pieces of a pig virus." Dr. Margaret
Hamburg, FDA commissioner, said, "This was a difficult decision for us because
there is no evidence at this time that there is a risk to children." The
decision on the Rotarix vaccine, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline, also "is
unlikely to disrupt routine immunizations in children since a second vaccine,
this one made by Merck and called RotaTeq, remains available." Dr. Hamburg
added, "We're not taking this vaccine off the
market."
The Wall
Street Journal (3/23, Dooren, Favole) reports that the FDA's
recommendation came after it became aware that an independent US academic team
found porcine circovirus 1, or PCV-1, DNA in Rotarix. Dr. Hamburg also noted
that a panel of outside medical experts in four to six weeks will be convened to
address the
issue.
The Washington
Post (3/23, Brown) notes that "preliminary tests of GSK's inactivated
polio vaccine, which is also made in cell culture, has not found the
contaminating
virus."
AFP
(3/23) also points out that "European medical regulators were urgently seeking
information Monday" from Glaxo "after finding traces of a virus that normally
infects swine in a children's vaccine." Still, the European Medicines Agency
said in a statement, "The findings do not present a public health
threat."
According to USA
Today (3/23, Rubin), "One million US babies have received Rotarix, a
two-dose oral vaccine, since its approval in 2008, FDA Commissioner Margaret
Hamburg
said."
CNN
(3/23, Watkins) adds that "Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, said 'a
substantial amount' of the DNA was found in the vaccine. But, he stressed,
'there is no evidence that it causes any disease. ... There is no evidence that
it ever does
anything.'"
Recent Plavix boxed warning divides physicians.
The Wall
Street Journal (3/23, Winslow) reports that every month, approximately
three million prescriptions for Plavix (clopidogrel) are written, but some
patients carry genetic abnormalities that render the drug ineffective. The
medical community has known about such risks for more than a year; however, the
FDA's recent decision to place a boxed warning on the clot-preventing drug has
caused a divide among cardiologists who are either unsure about the usefulness
of genetic testing, the soundness of doubling doses, or the benefits of
switching patients to a rival drug, Effient (prasugrel). "'There are so many
questions about what to do that it puts us in a tough spot on a day-to-day
basis,' says Christopher Cannon," a Brigham and Women's Hospital cardiologist.
He added, "There are lots of issues, none of which have any
answers."
Employment/Workplace Safety
KBR withdraws appeal asking SCOTUS to block rape lawsuit.
The AP
(3/22) reported, "Halliburton Co. and KBR Inc. have withdrawn an appeal asking
the U.S. Supreme Court to block a lawsuit by a former military contractor who
says she was raped by KBR co-workers in Iraq. KBR said in a statement Monday
that it withdrew the appeal to not risk violating a recently passed federal
provision it called "very broad and vague," that restricts the Defense
Department from doing business with companies that prohibit employees from
seeking redress for certain crimes through the courts." Jamie Leigh Jones, "of
Texas, sued the companies after she says she was raped while working for KBR in
Baghdad in 2005. KBR and Halliburton split in
2007."
More men filing sexual harassment claims.
The Wall
Street Journal (3/23, Mattioli) reports that according to the EEOC, an
increasing percentage of sexual harassment claims since the beginning of the
recession are being filed by
men.
Medical Errors/Healthcare
Physicians' litigation fears may keep medical costs high after reform.
In Newsweek (3/22), Sharon
Begley, noting that although many lawmakers "remain opposed to" the newly passed
reform bill "because it does too little to rein in medical costs," pointed out
that "history is full of examples of imperfect legislation (Social Security,
civil rights) being improved by subsequent bills." With that in mind, "there is
no better place to start than with unnecessary care," and many physicians
"couldn't get their nominees" for certain procedures in "fast enough," because
"doctors hate practicing defensive medicine." But, "nationwide, physicians
estimate that 35 percent of diagnostic tests they ordered were to avoid
lawsuits, as were 19 percent of hospitalizations, 14 percent of prescriptions,
and eight percent of surgeries," which amounts to some "$650 billion in
unnecessary care every year." Begley notes that "even in Texas, where a 2003
tort-reform law caps awards for pain and suffering at $750,000, physicians
practiced defensive medicine at the same rate as in other
states."
Product Safety
Bills would make it harder for Louisiana insurers to drop Chinese drywall homeowners.
The New
Orleans Times-Picayune (3/22, Anderson) reported, "Two New Orleans area
lawmakers have filed competing bills for the upcoming lawmaking session that
would prohibit or make it harder for insurance companies to drop policyholders
who filed claims based on the presence of tainted Chinese drywall in their
homes. Sen. Julie Quinn, R-Metairie, and Rep. Walt Leger III, D-New Orleans,
filed the bills for the legislative session that opens
Monday."
Florida homeowners grapple with Chinese drywall.
Scripps News (3/22,
Vanderhoof) reported, "According to a database obtained by Scripps Howard News
Service from the U. S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, about 166 Chinese
drywall complaints have originated from [Florida's] Treasure Coast including 53
from Indian River County, 90 from St. Lucie County and 23 from Martin County."
Dozens of homeowners "are taking their builders and drywall manufacturers to
court." Others "are simply walking away from homes, risking foreclosure, while
some homeowners are considering paying for expensive repair procedures that
promise to fix the drywall problems and salvage the home. Some more fortunate
homeowners have received assistance from their builders but others continue to
live in the homes and pay the mortgage despite the possibility of health risks
because they don't have the money to pay rent at an apartment and a
mortgage."
Plaintiff's lawyer to pan Toyota's safety systems in press event.
USA
Today (3/23, O'Donnell) reports that in a Washington, DC, press
conference scheduled for today, an attorney in a case against Toyota will claim
that the automaker's "safety systems are 'deficient' because they do not detect
problems that lead to unintended acceleration. ... Disputing Toyota's claims
that its 'fail-safe' systems prevent unwanted acceleration will be Tom Murray, a
Sandusky, Ohio, lawyer who has brought dozens of unintended-acceleration cases
over 20 years, and three British engineers who specialize in electronics and
electromagnetic interference (EMI) from signals in or outside the car. The group
also contends that no amount of testing could assure Toyota that EMI or software
glitches can't cause unintended
acceleration."
California sisters sue Toyota over 2008 crash.
The San Jose Mercury
News (3/23, Salonga) reports that a pair of sisters from Contra Costa
County, California, filed suit this week alleging that Toyota is responsible
"for injuries they suffered in a 2008 car accident, claiming their Camry
suddenly accelerated and sent them crashing into a brick wall. ... The suit
further claims that a recall of that Camry model would have prevented the
accident."
Toyota told dealers sudden acceleration linked to electronics in 2002.
CNN
(3/23, Griffin, Fitzpatrick) reports that in a 2002 technical service bulletin
to its dealerships, Toyota warned "that Camry owners were complaining about
throttles surging and recommended adjustments in an electronic control unit to
fix the problem." The document "went to every U.S. Toyota dealership in late
August 2002 after some customers reported their vehicles were speeding up
unexpectedly. 'Some 2002 model year Camry vehicles may exhibit a surging during
light throttle input at speeds between 38-42 mph,' the bulletin states. 'The
Engine Control Module (ECM) calibration has been revised to correct this
condition.'" CNN contrasts this document with Toyota's repeated insistence that
its sudden acceleration problems are not due to electronic
factors.
Toyota Announces Plan To Replace Accelerators In Secondary Recall.
The New York
Times (3/23, Maynard, Bunkley) reports that Toyota has announced that
its dealerships will "provide replacement accelerator pedals to owners unhappy
with repairs" after a series of cases of unintended acceleration in cars that
have already been through the recall process. "'Accelerator pedal replacement is
based on specific customer request only,' said the memo, which was addressed to
dealers, service managers and parts managers. 'Dealers are not to solicit pedal
replacement.'"
Hazardous lead levels found in some Indian spices, powders.
In "Vital Signs," the New York
Times (3/23, D6, Rabin) reports that "it appears Indian spices and
ceremonial powders may contain lead at levels that may be hazardous to
children." In a report
published in the March 15 edition of the journal Pediatrics, Boston researchers
"tested the products after four young children were referred to the hospital
with elevated blood lead levels." They "found that only about one-quarter of
spices had any detectable lead, but 58 percent of ceremonial powders and 81
percent of cosmetics tested contained
lead."
Also in the News
FTC orders Pennsylvania telemarketing scam to pay $4.7M restitution.
The Legal
Intelligencer (3/23, Duffy) reports, "Chalk up a win for the Federal
Trade Commission now that U.S. District Judge Donetta W. Ambrose of the Western
District of Pennsylvania has shut down a telemarketing scam run by an East
Pittsburgh firm and ordered more than $4.7 million in restitution to consumers.
In the suit, FTC lawyers argued that Magazine Solutions Inc. engaged in a
nationwide telemarketing scam that targeted young mothers with promises of
valuable coupons when, in fact, they were luring them into buying unwanted
magazine
subscriptions."
|
|
AAJ News Brief is a digest of the most important news selected from thousands of
sources by the editors of Custom Briefings. The presence of advertising does not
endorse, or imply endorsement of, any products or services by the American
Association for
Justice.
This complimentary copy of AAJ News Brief was sent to haytham@puckettfaraj.com as part of your
American Association for Justice membership. View Custom Briefings' privacy policy. Neither
Custom Briefings nor the American Association for Justice is liable for the use
of or reliance on any information contained in this
briefing.
For information about other member benefits, please contact American Association
for Justice Member Service Center at (800)
424-2727.
American Association for Justice | 777 6th Street, NW | Washington, DC 20001
Copyright © 2010 by Custom Briefings
|
11190 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 130 | Reston, VA 20191
|
|