[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: confidential



I'm sayin'.  You've got him.  Not even sure we need to go through all the Brahms drama (and billing of his client) for ANOTHER pretrial interview.
N
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Haytham wrote:

I would like Kallop at trial. What a sad example of an officer. 

Haytham Faraj 
760-521-7934
Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Puckett Neal <neal@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

"Oh, and by the way, there IS the concept standing by your Marines and doing loyalty and fidelity requires without making sure all of the necessary documents are in place to "cover your 6."  But of course, that went unsaid.  We'll remember Kallop's level of cooperation if there is ever a time to write about this experience.  McConnell called me out of the blue to offer his help.
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Puckett Neal <neal@puckettfaraj.com>
Date: August 19, 2010 1:13:00 PM EDT
To: David Brahms <dmbrahms@aol.com>
Cc: Faraj Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>, Vokey Colby <cvokey@fhsulaw.com>
Subject: Re: Good day, Sir! Kallop

Copy all, Sir.  Thank you for the quick reply.  We'll stand by.
V/r,
Neal
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

On Aug 19, 2010, at 12:57 PM, David Brahms wrote:

Neal:

Let me chat with my client and get back.   

My client has not been subpoenaed by the government as yet nor have they provided the documents that were earlier requested by me.  Those documents include evidence of grants of immunity given to the client.  Dick McNeil (co-counsel) and I need to review the immunity docs to insure they are current and fully cover the client's 6.  Our policy is no interviews until that is done. I intend to beard the government today as to why I don't have the docs.

You may hear from the government that there has been an arrangement for the prosecutor to travel to NYC to interview the client.  While that was earlier talked about as a possibility, in my view, the time has passed for such to occur.  We will resist such a meeting.  Our position is that the client has been fully cooperative with the government.  He has given repeated interviews and testified multiple times-he has met the mandate of any applicable immunity agreement, that he is not legally required to take time out from an incredibly busy personal and professional life to come to N