[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Request for a 39a; U.S. v. Rowe



Mr. Faraj,

Just for clarification, does that mean that Capt Rowe is here in Quantico?

Thanks.
Capt Peter C. Combe II
Trial Counsel
Office of the SJA, MCB Quantico
3250 Catlin Ave.
Quantico, VA 22134 

Comm: (703) 784-0037  DSN: 278
Fax: (703) 784-0035  DSN: 278


-----Original Message-----
From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 8:42
To: Hoover Maj Christopher M
Cc: Hale, Charles C LtColTRIJUDACT, NDW; Hoey, Jeffrey T Sgt TRIJUDACT, WNYD; Combe Capt Peter C; Mcconnell Major Matthew N
Subject: Re: Request for a 39a; U.S. v. Rowe

Your honor,
Capt Rowe is available.  I think it may be advisable to do this on the record. 

Haytham Faraj 
Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:34 AM, "Hoover Maj Christopher M" <christopher.hoover@usmc.mil> wrote:

> Gentlemen,
>  It just occurred to me that a 39(a) will require the presence of the accused.  He is located in Oklahoma.  I would ask to handle whatever we can in an 802 so that we do not have to delay any decisions waiting for an accused to fly here.
> Respectfully,
> 
> Major Christopher M. Hoover
> Military Justice Officer 
> Marine Corps Base Quantico
> (703) 432-0488 (office)
> (603) 809-5781 (cell)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hoover Maj Christopher M 
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 6:50
> To: Haytham Faraj; 'Hale, Charles C LtCol TRIJUDACT, NDW'
> Cc: 'Hoey, Jeffrey T Sgt TRIJUDACT, WNYD'; Combe Capt Peter C; Mcconnell Major Matthew N
> Subject: RE: Request for a 39a; U.S. v. Rowe
> 
> Sir,
>  The government respectfully requests that the court entertain a 39(a) as early as possible.  The defense is likely going to request another continuance.  The government needs an answer as soon as possible as we have members, courtrooms, and witnesses to coordinate.
> Respectfully,
> 
> Major Christopher M. Hoover
> Military Justice Officer 
> Marine Corps Base Quantico
> (703) 432-0488 (office)
> (603) 809-5781 (cell)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 16:20
> To: 'Hale, Charles C LtCol TRIJUDACT, NDW'
> Cc: 'Hoey, Jeffrey T Sgt TRIJUDACT, WNYD'; Combe Capt Peter C; Hoover Maj Christopher M; Mcconnell Major Matthew N
> Subject: Request for a 39a; U.S. v. Rowe
> 
> Your honor,
> The defense respectfully requests a 39a for Monday November 7 or Tuesday Nov
> 8.  The purpose of the request is to take up a defense motion to relieve
> detailed defense counsel.  The reason the relief of counsel is necessary is
> due to an imputed disqualification of counsel arising from a conflict.  Maj
> McConnell can provide more information on the matter once we get on the
> record.  Trial counsel have been notified.
> 
> Vr,
> 
> Haytham Faraj, Esq.
> PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC
> _______________________
> WASHINGTON DC METRO
> The Law Firm of Puckett & Faraj, PC
> 1800 Diagonal Road
> Suite 210
> Alexandria, VA 22314
> 703-706-0442 Phone
> 202-280-1039 Fax
> 
> DETROIT METRO
> The Law Firm of Puckett & Faraj, PC
> 835 Mason Street
> Suite 150-A
> Dearborn, MI 48124
> 313-457-1390 Phone
> 202-280-1039 Fax
> 
> 
> www.puckettfaraj.com
> 
> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is
> intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any
> use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify
> Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to
> sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading
> or making any copy or distribution.
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature