[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Important CAAF decision



Excellent point!
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

On Aug 10, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Haytham Faraj wrote:

Wasn't thinking blogging.  More information for other counsel. It's a complex decision 60+ pages    We could certainly blog about it but one of us would have to break it down and it will probably be long. I bet Dwight already blogged on it. 

Haytham Faraj
Sent from my iPad

On Aug 10, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Puckett Neal <neal@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

Might want to include Marcy on distribution if you want this blogged about.  I've copied her here. 

Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Haytham Faraj wrote:

Here it is for real this time.

http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/newcaaf/opinions/2010SepTerm/11-0149.pdf

Haytham Faraj
Sent from my iPad

On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

Here's the link

Haytham Faraj
Sent from my iPad

On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

On august 8, 2011, CAAF overruled years of precedent in the U.S. V. Fosler decision which states that the terminal element in a 134 charge must be pled. The decision is worth reading.

Haytham Faraj
Sent from my iPad