[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: U.S. v. 1Lt Burke, Def Motion for Continuance
- To: "Kouba, Dustin B Capt USAF ACC 7 BW/JA" <Dustin.Kouba@dyess.af.mil>
- Subject: Re: U.S. v. 1Lt Burke, Def Motion for Continuance
- From: Col Wes Moore <jwesmoore@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 19:00:23 -0500
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jwesmoore@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jwesmoore@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Cc: "Moore, Wes Col USAF AETC AF/JAT-C" <wes.moore@sheppard.af.mil>, PuckettNeal <neal@puckettfaraj.com>, Faraj Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>, "matt.talcott@gmail.com" <matt.talcott@gmail.com>, "Mann, Elizabeth A SrAUSAF ACC 7 BW/JA" <Elizabeth.Mann@dyess.af.mil>, "Metcalf, Julie A TSgt USAFAFLOA AFLOA/ADC" <Julie.Metcalf@dyess.af.mil>, "Doser-Pascual, Ranae L CaptMIL USAF AFLOA/JAJD" <ranae.doser-pascual@pentagon.af.mil>
- Delivered-to: haytham@puckettfaraj.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=lWkbeYDl7BoDa8t1A6YBDulVBFOEzuHcsCSgMi3qpuM=; b=HrVc13gGx/zBdNpyyRluOW1nbiPE71GoMjezSvquKEdNOmE+519ayKIt4/DtvT3C5y 4RA3Mtjdm1nag77+s3WmzPYSsZCsNY9uWZvuqlDSUMBjgP8T5H6R+buuO7RVbtwfDF70 pi070f469wMT2AmXgSOGKHTSEFZT+tOyKuMGg=
- In-reply-to: <201108032200.p73M08UC081821@fnwz-fwl-001.dyess.af.mil>
- References: <57E82F443E446D4E86A768BAF40C3931588758F0E9@washingtonapple.pentagon.ncr.ds.af.mil> <201108031646.p73GkApI049230@fnwz-fwl-001.dyess.af.mil> <ED058A5A-973E-4A74-9EAF-D18A30B2FD97@gmail.com> <201108032200.p73M08UC081821@fnwz-fwl-001.dyess.af.mil>
11 Oct will be fine.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 3, 2011, at 5:01 PM, "Kouba, Dustin B Capt USAF ACC 7 BW/JA" <Dustin.Kouba@dyess.af.mil> wrote:
> Sir,
>
> The Government just realized a few hours after your ruling that 10 October 2011 is Columbus Day, a Federal holiday. I have spoken with Defense Counsel and they have agreed to start on 11 October and conclude on 14 October if you would concur with the request.
>
> v/r,
>
> Dustin B. Kouba, Capt, USAF
> Trial Counsel
> 7 Lancer Loop, Ste 223
> Dyess AFB, TX 79607
> DSN: 461-2035
> Comm: 325-696-2035
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Col Wes Moore [mailto:jwesmoore@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:51 PM
> To: Kouba, Dustin B Capt USAF ACC 7 BW/JA
> Cc: Moore, Wes Col USAF AETC AF/JAT-C; Puckett Neal; Faraj Haytham; matt.talcott@gmail.com; Mann, Elizabeth A SrA USAF ACC 7 BW/JA; Metcalf, Julie A TSgt USAF AFLOA AFLOA/ADC; Doser-Pascual, Ranae L Capt MIL USAF AFLOA/JAJD
> Subject: Re: U.S. v. 1Lt Burke, Def Motion for Continuance
>
> Thank you,
>
> The defense request is granted. Trial will commence at 0830 on 10 Oct 2011.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:47 AM, "Kouba, Dustin B Capt USAF ACC 7 BW/JA" <Dustin.Kouba@dyess.af.mil> wrote:
>
>> Sir,
>>
>> Attached please find the Government's response to the Defense's Motion for a Continuance in the matter of U.S. v. 1st Lt Patrick T. Burke.
>>
>> v/r,
>>
>> Dustin B. Kouba, Capt, USAF
>> Trial Counsel
>> 7 Lancer Loop, Ste 223
>> Dyess AFB, TX 79607
>> DSN: 461-2035
>> Comm: 325-696-2035
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doser-Pascual, Ranae L Capt MIL USAF AFLOA/JAJD [mailto:Ranae.Doser-Pascual@pentagon.af.mil]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 3:58 PM
>> To: jwesmoore@gmail.com
>> Cc: Puckett Neal; Faraj Haytham; Kouba, Dustin B Capt USAF ACC 7 BW/JA; matt.talcott@gmail.com; Mann, Elizabeth A SrA USAF ACC 7 BW/JA; Metcalf, Julie A TSgt USAF AFLOA AFLOA/ADC
>> Subject: U.S. v. 1Lt Burke, Def Motion for Continuance
>>
>> Sir,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please find attached the Defense's Motion for a Continuance in the matter of U.S. v. 1Lt Patrick Burke.
>>
>>
>>
>> V/r
>>
>>
>>
>> Ranae L. Doser-Pascual, Capt, USAF
>>
>> AFLOA/JAJD Deputy Chief Policy and Training
>>
>> Joint Base Andrews NAF, MD
>>
>> DSN: 612-4792
>>
>> COMM: 240-612-4792
>>
>>
>>
>> <Response to Motion for Continuance - U.S. v. Burke.pdf>