[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ROWE
- To: haytham@puckettfaraj.com
- Subject: Re: ROWE
- From: jim rowe <jroweusmc@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 06:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jroweusmc@yahoo.com designates 98.139.212.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jroweusmc@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com
- Delivered-to: haytham@puckettfaraj.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1311601849; bh=XSTYkfB4MrMfvlqR9JalNJeyNSQAGim+4oTmapfVTdQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yXhVrtguS6jzL9k9w6d8cQpyl0vcy//zBYZHMiUEigogXuXAGSTlHhNMwVhTtH5ka0QLD88bB6nwlp4Bs+ga8gRHyDMmWw4+LQvE8eQF5eUfqNsNkBCoB3CSj9ePNQIXMmrOUXU+LtmAWFEN8H+vnqIPdGZ2h2jJng3f0WtIqb8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FVXWtINO/KVlGYvzI/Yp5US+9rpL0u7/rBNHjDRQbhcIe8skcDAq26t1XkFZ6kHuxnPYchlygsbPKus1z8kKxcILDZwpTgsYlm0OhXLubfkSIVtgglbb+rErVXLlqRKP2GFYHrxbzmUBl6b7zMzIAfpf7KLb4S+YeDsCx1PpK+s=;
Sir,
I don't want a general dischage.
Jim
On Mon Jul 25th, 2011 4:45 AM EDT Haytham Faraj wrote:
>Jim,
>This has to be your decision. I'm happy to help but the decision must be yours.
>
>Haytham Faraj
>Sent from my iPad
>
>On Jul 23, 2011, at 9:12 AM, jim rowe <jroweusmc@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Sir,
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> From: Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
>> To: jim rowe <jroweusmc@yahoo.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 3:17 AM
>> Subject: Re: ROWE
>>
>> It would have to be no less than general.
>>
>> Haytham Faraj
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jul 23, 2011, at 6:40 AM, jim rowe <jroweusmc@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sir,
>>>
>>> What would the discharge be?
>>>
>>> From: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
>>> To: jim rowe <jroweusmc@yahoo.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 11:22 AM
>>> Subject: Fwd: ROWE
>>>
>>> FYI. See below.
>>>
>>> Haytham Faraj
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: "Hoover Capt Christopher M" <christopher.hoover@usmc.mil>
>>>> Date: July 21, 2011 6:45:36 AM EDT
>>>> To: "Haytham" <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
>>>> Cc: "Mcconnell Major Matthew N" <matthew.n.mcconnell@usmc.mil>
>>>> Subject: RE: ROWE
>>>>
>>>> This is about to go up the general for signature. Give me a NJP deal along with a RILT. Timing is about to get away from us, and the CG will be less inclined to deal with this administratively.
>>>>
>>>> Captain Christopher M. Hoover, USMC
>>>> Military Justice Officer MCB Quantico
>>>> Work: (703) 784-0037
>>>> Cell: (603) 809-5781
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Haytham [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 11:20
>>>> To: Hoover Capt Christopher M
>>>> Cc: Mcconnell Major Matthew N
>>>> Subject: Re: ROWE
>>>>
>>>> I can recommend an NJP. I cannot advise a BOI waiver. What I can support is a request for a resignation. If that is something you can get behind, I'll discuss it with Capt Rowe. I'm happy to recommend that this case go away. But I will not recommend that my client bear a greater burden than he is responsible for.
>>>>
>>>> Vr,
>>>>
>>>> Haytham Faraj
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 5, 2011, at 10:42 AM, "Hoover Capt Christopher M" <christopher.hoover@usmc.mil> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If you gave me a NJP with a BOI waiver, I would support it with the command, pleading only to 133. I am working on a TC memo and I think the timing of a PTA along with the Art 32 report and memo could work with the CA in the case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Captain Christopher M. Hoover, USMC
>>>>> Military Justice Officer MCB Quantico
>>>>> Work: (703) 784-0037
>>>>> Cell: (603) 809-5781
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Rob Bracknell [mailto:rob.bracknell@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 22:50
>>>>> To: Hoover Capt Christopher M; haytham@puckettfaraj.com; McConnell Sgt Matthew C
>>>>> Cc: Bracknell LtCol Robert G
>>>>> Subject: Draft Report -- final to be delivered tomorrow
>>>>>
>>>>> This will help both sides get a jump start tomorrow on resolving this case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary of my rec: this is not a GCM case because the Article 120 and related sexual assault-type offenses are unprovable through the testimony of 1stLt Klay, and there is insufficient independent corroboration to shore up her testimony. Moreover, there is a problem with the charging theory on the element of force -- the acts alleged by the government do not constitute "force" within the meaning of the sexual assault statutes. Capt Rowe rates punishment for a handful of lesser offenses at a lower forum and should be separated from the Marine Corps, but not through the means of a GCM.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can reach me after tomorrow at my gmail address or my usmc.mil address. I will join at New River Friday morning.
>>>>>
>>>>> s/f,
>>>>> rgb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Butch Bracknell
>>>>> Lieutenant Colonel, US Marine Corps
>>>>> CMC Fellow, The Atlantic Council
>>>>> rbracknell@acus.org
>>>>> 757-287-4704
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>