| Sir,
Thanks. What do we do from here? Will they offer a deal? I kinda want to play this all the way out, because her made up story of the hotel porn and masturbation is just as untrue as the rest of her testimony. Also, can I sue her and that husband of hers?
Respectfully,
Jim --- On Wed, 6/29/11, Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:
From: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
Subject: Fwd: Draft Report -- final to be delivered tomorrow
To: "jim rowe" <jroweusmc@yahoo.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 29, 2011, 11:08 PM
Jim, Here's the report for your review. Haytham
Faraj Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
This will help both sides get a jump start tomorrow on resolving this case.
Summary of my rec: this is not a GCM case because the Article 120 and related sexual assault-type offenses are unprovable through the testimony of 1stLt Klay, and there is insufficient independent corroboration to shore up her testimony. Moreover, there is a problem with the charging theory on the element of force -- the acts alleged by the government do not constitute "force" within the meaning of the sexual assault statutes. Capt Rowe rates punishment for a handful of lesser offenses at a lower forum and should be separated from the Marine Corps, but not through the means of a GCM.
You can reach me after tomorrow at my gmail address or my usmc.mil address. I will join at New River Friday morning.
s/f,
rgb
--
Butch Bracknell
Lieutenant Colonel, US Marine Corps
CMC Fellow, The Atlantic Council
757-287-4704
|