[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- Te: trial, government argument on the issue below, and the judge's FoF and co= on 25 April 2011. and expedite review of the case. In it the government says, among other= things, that Neither LtCol Sullivan nor Maj Gannon has ever visited the= site. give me an address. The service document says that this stuff was served= on me and the "counsel of record" on June 3rd. Did anyone else receive th= Dwight.Sullivan@pentagon.af.mil; babu_kaza@hotmail.com; meridith.marshall= and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If= you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notifi= is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, plea= to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without read= of Court for NMCCA. I have already made corrections to the record which= have been captured by my identity and the date and time of the change." been filed yet? If neither transcript has been filed, that would seem to= strengthen the case for waiting past 9 June to file our mandamus petition= have to then file our motion for access to the sealed transcript, it lite= copy of the sealed ROT with NMCCA. I'll try to verify that. But I don't= think I've heard of him filing an authenticated copy of the unsealed ROT. for us to access the sealed portion of the ROT. (We don't wan't to file= a motion to unseal it; we don't want the government to have access to it,= but we need access to it ourselves. The motion should be similar to what= we filed at CAAF, attached.) He asked Gannon to forward the record to the court including the sealed= portion but directed that only the court reporters handle it.=20 Article 39(a) session yet? the ex parte hearing? our mandamus petition before then. If Jones hasn't filed the authenticate= 20 days from the ruling complained of to file the mandamus petition. duty orders but?
----------MB_8CDF32EE5F848FE_1674_5C61_webmail-d097.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<div style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: arial"><FONT fac=
e=3Darial color=3Dblack></FONT><SPAN contentEditable=3Dfalse style=3D"DISP=
LAY: inline-block"></SPAN>Oorah -- that's very helpful information. =
Is he still a major? What's his first name?</div>
<div style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: arial"> </d=
iv>
<div style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: arial">Semper Fi=
,<br>
DHS</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com><br>
To: 'Babu Kaza' <babu_kaza@hotmail.com>; meridith.marshall@usmc.mil;=
neal@puckettfaraj.com; kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil; dhsullivan@aol.com<br>
Cc: dwight.sullivan@pentagon.af.mil<br>
Sent: Tue, Jun 7, 2011 9:29 am<br>
Subject: RE: Wuterich follow-up<br>
<br>
<div id=3DAOLMsgPart_2_23f2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f>
<STYLE>#AOLMsgPart_2_23f2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f td{color: black;=
} @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6=
3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3=
2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;=
} #AOLMsgPart_2_23f2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f p.MsoNormal,#AOLMs=
gPart_2_23f2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f li.MsoNormal,#AOLMsgPart_2_2=
3f2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin=
-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","seri=
f";} #AOLMsgPart_2_23f2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f a:link,#AOLMsgPar=
t_2_23f2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-p=
riority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} #AOLMsgPart_2_23f=
2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f a:visited,#AOLMsgPart_2_23f2750f-c9aa-47=
2a-9fad-e14706fcda8f span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99;=
color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} #AOLMsgPart_2_23f2750f-c9a=
a-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f p {mso-style-priority:99; mso-margin-top-alt:=
auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in;=
font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} #AOLMsgPar=
t_2_23f2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f span.EmailStyle18 {mso-style-ty=
pe:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;}=
#AOLMsgPart_2_23f2750f-c9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f .MsoChpDefault {mso=
-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:=
8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} #AOLMsgPart_2_23f2750f-c=
9aa-472a-9fad-e14706fcda8f div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} </STYL=
E>
<div class=3DaolReplacedBody lang=3DEN-US vlink=3D"purple" link=3D"blue">
<div class=3DWordSection1>
<div class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FON=
T-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">By the way, Erickson is back as the OIC=
of the legal team. He is in essence the head prosecutor. </SPAN></d=
iv>
<div class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FON=
T-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'"> </SPAN></div>
<div>
<div style=3D"BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP:=
#b5c4df 1pt solid; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT:=
medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">
<div class=3DMsoNormal><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Ta=
homa','sans-serif'">From:</SPAN></B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-F=
AMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"> Babu Kaza [<A href=3D"mailto:babu_kaza@hotm=
ail.com?">mailto:babu_kaza@hotmail.com</A>] <br>
<B>Sent:</B> Monday, June 06, 2011 3:31 PM<br>
<B>To:</B> <A href=3D"mailto:meridith.marshall@usmc.mil";>meridith.marshall=
@usmc.mil</A>; <A href=3D"mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com";>neal@puckettfaraj.=
com</A>; <A href=3D"mailto:kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil";>kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil<=
/A>; <A href=3D"mailto:dhsullivan@aol.com";>dhsullivan@aol.com</A><br>
<B>Cc:</B> <A href=3D"mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com";>haytham@puckettfara=
j.com</A>; <A href=3D"mailto:dwight.sullivan@pentagon.af.mil";>dwight.sulli=
van@pentagon.af.mil</A><br>
<B>Subject:</B> RE: Wuterich follow-up</SPAN></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class=3DMsoNormal> </div>
<div class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahom=
a','sans-serif'">From the last time I talked to Maj Liebenguth, he recalle=
d seeing (then) Maj Erickson and (then) Capt Gannon at Haditha. <br>
<br>
> Subject: RE: Wuterich follow-up<br>
> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:26:32 -0700<br>
> From: <A href=3D"mailto:meridith.marshall@usmc.mil";>meridith.marshall=
@usmc.mil</A><br>
> To: <A href=3D"mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com";>neal@puckettfaraj.com</A=
>; <A href=3D"mailto:kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil";>kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil</A>;=
<A href=3D"mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com";>DHSULLIVAN@aol.com</A><br>
> CC: <A href=3D"mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com";>haytham@puckettfaraj.=
com</A>; <A href=3D"mailto:Dwight.Sullivan@pentagon.af.mil";>Dwight.Sulliva=
n@pentagon.af.mil</A>; <A href=3D"mailto:babu_kaza@hotmail.com";>babu_kaza@=
hotmail.com</A><br>
> <br>
> Gents,<br>
> <br>
> I am sure he didn't go alone. I wonder who else was with him.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Major Meridith L. Marshall<br>
> Senior Defense Counsel<br>
> MCAS, Miramar<br>
> 858-577-1720 (desk line)<br>
> dsn 267-1720<br>
> 858-997-8332 (government cell)<br>
> <A href=3D"mailto:meridith.marshall@usmc.mil";>meridith.marshall@usmc.=
mil</A> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: Puckett Neal [<A href=3D"mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com?";>mailto:=
neal@puckettfaraj.com</A>] <br>
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 11:58 AM<br>
> To: Sripinyo, Kirk Major NAMARA, CODE 45; Sullivan Dwight<br>
> Cc: Faraj Haytham; Sullivan Dwight; Babu Kaza; Marshall Maj Meridith=
L<br>
> Subject: Re: Wuterich follow-up<br>
> <br>
> Well, guys, we know Maj Gannon went to Iraq in conjunction with the=
investigation this case. If he didn't want to call it a "site visit," we=
may be talking about mere semantics here. If he didn't bother to visit th=
e scene out at Route Chestnut, then that may be why they're pushing back=
on the issue.<br>
> Neal<br>
> <br>
> Neal A. Puckett, Esq<br>
> LtCol, USMC (Ret)<br>
> Puckett & Faraj, PC<br>
> 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210<br>
> Alexandria, VA 22314<br>
> 703.706.9566<br>
> <A href=3D"http://www.puckettfaraj.com/"; target=3D_blank>www.puckettf=
araj.com</A><br>
> <A href=3D"http://www.twitter.com/puckettfaraj"; target=3D_blank>www.t=
witter.com/puckettfaraj</A><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential,=
and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If=
you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notifi=
ed that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication=
is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, plea=
se notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-=
mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without=
reading or making any copy or distribution.<br>
> <br>
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Sripinyo, Kirk Major NAMARA, CODE 45 wro=
te:<br>
> <br>
> Sir-<br>
> <br>
> I just received paper copies of the following:<br>
> <br>
> (1) Gov't motion to attach Unauthenticated versions of the record of=
trial, government argument on the issue below, and the judge's FoF and co=
nclusions of law.<br>
> <br>
> (2) Unauthenticated record of the Article 39(a) session that occurred=
on 25 April 2011.<br>
> <br>
> (3) Judge Jones' FoF and Conclusions of law dated 31 May 2011.<br>
> <br>
> (4) The government's written argument on the defense motion below.<br=
>
> <br>
> (5) Appellate government's motion to remove the stay of proceedings=
and expedite review of the case. In it the government says, among other=
things, that Neither LtCol Sullivan nor Maj Gannon has ever visited the=
site.<br>
> <br>
> There's frankly too much here to scan. I can fedex it to you if you=
give me an address. The service document says that this stuff was served=
on me and the "counsel of record" on June 3rd. Did anyone else receive th=
is stuff?<br>
> <br>
> v/r<br>
> Sip<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: <A href=3D"mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com";>DHSULLIVAN@aol.com</A> [<=
A href=3D"mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com?";>mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com</A>] <br>
> Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 14:55<br>
> To: <A href=3D"mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com";>neal@puckettfaraj.com</A=
><br>
> Cc: <A href=3D"mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com";>haytham@puckettfaraj.=
com</A>; Sripinyo, Kirk Major NAMARA, CODE 45; <A href=3D"mailto:Dwight.Su=
llivan@pentagon.af.mil">Dwight.Sullivan@pentagon.af.mil</A>; <A href=3D"ma=
ilto:babu_kaza@hotmail.com">babu_kaza@hotmail.com</A>; <A href=3D"mailto:m=
eridith.marshall@usmc.mil">meridith.marshall@usmc.mil</A><br>
> Subject: Re: Wuterich follow-up<br>
> <br>
> Oorah. I think we certainly shouldn't file tomorrow. We should be rea=
dy to file on 9 June but then decide whether we actually want to. I'll beg=
in drafting the mandamus petition today.<br>
> <br>
> Semper Fi,<br>
> DHS<br>
> <br>
> In a message dated 6/5/2011 12:18:16 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, <A=
href=3D"mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com";>neal@puckettfaraj.com</A> writes:<b=
r>
> <br>
> I believe the correct answer is, "neither." <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Neal A. Puckett, Esq<br>
> LtCol, USMC (Ret)<br>
> Puckett & Faraj, PC<br>
> 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210<br>
> Alexandria, VA 22314<br>
> 703.706.9566<br>
> <A href=3D"http://www.puckettfaraj.com/"; target=3D_blank>www.puckettf=
araj.com</A> <<A href=3D"http://www.puckettfaraj.com/%3E"; target=3D_bla=
nk>http://www.puckettfaraj.com/></A>; <br>
> <A href=3D"http://www.twitter.com/puckettfaraj"; target=3D_blank>www.t=
witter.com/puckettfaraj</A><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential,=
and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If=
you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notifi=
ed that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication=
is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, plea=
se notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-=
mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without=
reading or making any copy or distribution.<br>
> <br>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 11:45 AM, <A href=3D"mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com";>DH=
SULLIVAN@aol.com</A> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Haytham,<br>
> <br>
> I seem to have misremembered. I think this is what I was thinking of:=
<br>
> <br>
> "I will send the transcript of the ex parte proceeding to the Clerk=
of Court for NMCCA. I have already made corrections to the record which=
have been captured by my identity and the date and time of the change."<b=
r>
> <br>
> So it's possible that NEITHER transcript has been filed with NMCCA ye=
t. So, Maj Sip, please hold off on filing the motion I suggested. Is it po=
ssible to check with NMCCA tomorrow to see whether either transcript has=
been filed yet? If neither transcript has been filed, that would seem to=
strengthen the case for waiting past 9 June to file our mandamus petition=
. If Jones waits until 13 June to file the authenticated transcript and we=
have to then file our motion for access to the sealed transcript, it lite=
rally might not be possible to file our mandamus petition until next week.=
<br>
> <br>
> Semper Fi,<br>
> DHS <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> In a message dated 6/5/2011 11:30:22 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, <A=
href=3D"mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com";>DHSULLIVAN@aol.com</A> writes:<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Thanks, Haytham. My recollection is that Jones filed an authenticated=
copy of the sealed ROT with NMCCA. I'll try to verify that. But I don't=
think I've heard of him filing an authenticated copy of the unsealed ROT.=
<br>
> <br>
> Maj Sip, would you be so kind as to file a motion with NMCCA tomorrow=
for us to access the sealed portion of the ROT. (We don't wan't to file=
a motion to unseal it; we don't want the government to have access to it,=
but we need access to it ourselves. The motion should be similar to what=
we filed at CAAF, attached.)<br>
> <br>
> Semper Fi,<br>
> DHS <br>
> <br>
> In a message dated 6/5/2011 11:26:15 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, <A=
href=3D"mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com";>haytham@puckettfaraj.com</A> wri=
tes:<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> I don't believe Jones has authenticated a copy of the sealed portion.=
He asked Gannon to forward the record to the court including the sealed=
portion but directed that only the court reporters handle it. <br>
> <br>
> None of us have the sealed portion. <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Haytham Faraj <br>
> Sent from my iPhone<br>
> <br>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 10:29 AM, <A href=3D"mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com";>DH=
SULLIVAN@aol.com</A> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Team Wuterich,<br>
> <br>
> Two questions which give rise to other questions:<br>
> <br>
> (1) Has Jones authenticated the non-sealed portions of the ROT of the=
Article 39(a) session yet?<br>
> <br>
> (2) Do Neal, Hatham, and/or Meredith have access to the sealed ROT of=
the ex parte hearing?<br>
> <br>
> The answer to (1) affects our optimal filing date. If Jones hasn't fi=
led the authenticated ROT before 9 June, there's no reason for us to file=
our mandamus petition before then. If Jones hasn't filed the authenticate=
d ROT by 9 June, we'll have to make a decision about whether to go beyond=
20 days from the ruling complained of to file the mandamus petition.<br>
> <br>
> If the answer to (2) is no, Maj Sip, can you please file a motion wit=
h NMCCA tomorrow for access to the sealed ROT?<br>
> <br>
> Oh, and a third question -- Maj Kaza, were you able to get associate=
duty orders but?<br>
> <br>
> Semper Fi,<br>
> DHS<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> =3D<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> </SPAN></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
----------MB_8CDF32EE5F848FE_1674_5C61_webmail-d097.sysops.aol.com--