Re: UCI-related Emails

To: "Haytham" <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>

Subject: Re: UCI-related Emails

Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:49:08 +0000

Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mackh2os@yahoo.com designates 98.136.185.207 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mackh2os@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com

Delivered-to: haytham@puckettfaraj.com

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1305586151; bh=j3WRU3qP/EtDYUB0j1O3UTZbUSAvpkipFtcybRJmVd8=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=DL1BhDxHA8OYmW5vqj6xRTtcexIVDzJnK6CuSnPLVKbex3x8Wy931v4WLPw29tP8TYTlUObFvvQWLvy2swa8KZxlTb0k1Qgb7HaRWTwvivCfxXOvy96ULlfWeRyrFxM3bn1dryYIEPH8gkPNe5fH2aJX4Y+/KD4RRnckuE9wNqc=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=C6Q6A7mG9QdylP4Li6P2bknwBbopPhdyj5qTgAfyWS9WoJR08LN4cyLwotMuKBa+yGbBuOLCSfUGD2fUl+h5gYisR10bLqZNLSzuLlfcEpS817kpWz+hpWgHZNo3rJGOrUMYCvTxgH7fXYNjCsA2zneUVvPcjacmPz6zPmfdZl0= ;

Importance: Normal

In-reply-to: <EDE3D71C-8F8C-4D75-9815-FBEF3F8CBFAD@puckettfaraj.com>

References: <732926.58984.qm@web161605.mail.bf1.yahoo.com><EDE3D71C-8F8C-4D75-9815-FBEF3F8CBFAD@puckettfaraj.com>

Reply-to: mackh2os@yahoo.com

Sensitivity: Normal

Rgr. Will digest your legal reference tonight.

Peace

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

From: Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>

Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:44:47 -0400

To: Mack Waters<mackh2os@yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: UCI-related Emails

It's of no relevance.

Haytham Faraj

Sent from my iPhone

On May 16, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Mack Waters <mackh2os@yahoo.com> wrote:

Haytham,

Attached email string (read from bottom up) pertains to concern that my CO and First Radio Battalion may have unlawfully influenced my case.

Is the fact that SECNAV has already issued his final determination (lesser grade) relevant to whether or not I can raise the UCI issue now, assuming I can substantiate?

Mack

<UCI-related Emails.doc>

References:

UCI-related Emails
- From: Mack Waters <mackh2os@yahoo.com>