[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: google searches



Will do!

Â

Thanks Again!

Â

Micah Johnson

Chief Ingredient, Inc.

(619) 365-4423

micah@chiefingredient.com

Â

From: Puckett Neal [mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:45 AM
To: Micah Johnson
Cc: Debra D'Agostino; Faraj Haytham; Atwood Marcy
Subject: Re: google searches

Â

Micah,

Take us up to $12K for Google for our FEL campaign and give us $2000 for military law. ÂLet's drop Bing/Yahoo for the time being unless we need it to supplement later. Â

Haytham and I tend to be "players" and are ready to go big. ÂPlease work continue to work with Debra on verbiage and key search terms.

Â

Neal

Neal A. Puckett, Esq

LtCol, USMC (Ret)

Puckett & Faraj, PC

1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210

Alexandria, VA 22314

703.706.9566

Â

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.ÂÂYou are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

Â

On Apr 1, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Micah Johnson wrote:



Hi Neal,

Â

This is what we would recommend for the objectives you sent below:

Â

Based on researchingÂtheÂpossible traffic for theÂkey federalÂlaw employmentÂterms, we would recommend a monthly Google budget ofÂ$12,000 per month to be able to show 90%-100% of the time. This would put you in line withÂthe current competitors in this particular keyword space.Â

Â

If we remove the budget from Bing/Yahoo, that is market that may not have any exposure. There are still possible clients using those search engines, but we can focus 100% on Google to get that nailed down and work from there as needed.

Â

If we were to budget on Bing/Yahoo as well, we would recommend a monthly budget of $5,000 to be able to show 90%-100% of the time.

Â

Thanks Again!

Â

Micah Johnson

Chief Ingredient, Inc.

(619) 365-4423

Â

From:ÂPuckett Neal [mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com]Â
Sent:ÂFriday, April 01, 2011 8:09 AM
To:ÂMicah Johnson
Cc:ÂDebra D'Agostino; Atwood Marcy
Subject:ÂRe: google searches

Â

Micah,

Unless you can convince us otherwise, I think ALL of Debra's PPC money should go to Google. Â

Here's my goal. ÂI'd like for you to figure out which words bring "fedatty" and "Tullylegal" up on the paid searches and recommend how much money we'd need to spend to always come up at least on the paid searches to the right of the organic list. ÂIf we need to spend more to have her always visible with all of the most logical searches, we will do it.

Neal

Neal A. Puckett, Esq

LtCol, USMC (Ret)

Puckett & Faraj, PC

1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210

Alexandria, VA 22314

703.706.9566

Â

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.ÂÂYou are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

Â

On Mar 30, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Micah Johnson wrote:


Hi Debra,

The budget was mostly depleted by the 24th and we stretched it as far as we could.ÂÂ

The totalÂclicksÂfor the month of March is:
Â
Google: 846
Bing:Â978 (and counting as there are two days left)
Â
Keep in mind that Bing has a larger keyword budget (approx. $2500 vs $1800).

Thanks Again!
Micah

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Debra A D'Agostino <debra@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

Micah,

Â

How soon did it become exhausted, i.e., did it just run out today or have we been down for a week?

Â

Also, can you tell how many hits we are getting from bing versus google?

Â

Thanks again,

Â

Â

Debra A. D'Agostino
Partner

Â

1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 210

Alexandria, Va. 22314

debra@puckettfaraj.com
(703) 706-9566Â Phone
(202) 318-7652 ÂFax

DCÂ
×ÂCAÂ×ÂMIÂ×ÂVA
www.PuckettFaraj.com

Admitted in NY. Practice is limited to matters and proceedings before special courts - federal courts - agencies. Confidentiality / Privilege Notice: This transmission, including attachments, is intended solely for the use of the designated recipient(s). This transmission may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The use or disclosure of the information contained in this transmission for any purpose other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited. ÂIf you are not an intended recipient of this transmission, please immediately destroy all copies received and notify the sender.

Â

Â

Â

Â

From:ÂMicah Johnson [mailto:info@chiefingredient.com]Â
Sent:ÂWednesday, March 30, 2011 12:58 PM
To:ÂDebra A D'Agostino
Cc:ÂNeal Puckett
Subject:ÂRe: google searches

Â

Hi Debra,

The monthly budget has already been exhausted on Google for the month of March. The campaign is still running in Bing for the next two days. Starting April 1st when the new keyword monthly budget starts, the campaign will be backÂlive in Google.

Thanks!
Micah

2011/3/30 Debra A D'Agostino <debra@puckettfaraj.com>

Hey Micah,

Â

I've been trying some searches to see whether I'm popping up on google - and I'm not coming up anywhere. Neal said the funding was diverted to fed employment law already, so do you know why I don't seem to be in the paid ads?

Â

The phone has not been ringing at all.

Â

Thanks,

Â

Â

Debra A. D'Agostino
Partner

Â

1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 210

Alexandria, Va. 22314

debra@puckettfaraj.com
(703) 706-9566Â Phone
(202) 318-7652 ÂFax

DCÂ
×ÂCAÂ×ÂMIÂ×ÂVA
www.PuckettFaraj.com

Admitted in NY. Practice is limited to matters and proceedings before special courts - federal courts - agencies. Confidentiality / Privilege Notice: This transmission, including attachments, is intended solely for the use of the designated recipient(s). This transmission may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The use or disclosure of the information contained in this transmission for any purpose other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited. ÂIf you are not an intended recipient of this transmission, please immediately destroy all copies received and notify the sender.

Â

Â

Â

Â

Â

Â

Â