| Agree! Supplement! Neal A. Puckett, Esq LtCol, USMC (Ret) Puckett & Faraj, PC 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 703.706.9566 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Sullivan, Dwight H CIV USAF AFLOA/JAJA wrote: Kudos again to Babu for his outstanding argument today. I understand that audio of the argument is already up on CAAF’s website. I’ll send a link momentarily. In the meantime, it took me less than 2 minutes to find an opinion indicating that granting declaratory relief is permissible in a case proceeding under the All Writs Act – and, even better, the opinion is written by then-Chief Judge Posner: “Since the settlement stands, the judge's power to issue the injunction (and related declaratory relief) against these lawyers' enforcing the contingent-fee contracts or liens based upon them was a proper exercise of the court's jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (‘all writs’) to prevent interference with its orders.” In re Factor VIII, 159 F.3d 1016, 1020 (7th Cir. 1998). I think we should probably move to cite supplemental authority in answer to that question from CJE. Unless anyone else wants to take the lead, I’ll draft up something tonight and circulate it. Semper Fi, DHS |