Re: Fwd: Supreme Court Ruling Today

["Eric Montalvo" <eric@puckettfaraj.com>]

No if needed today debra knew abt this and could prob knock out why do we need to opine Can't we just post no one is going to comment on these r just for google right?  That's wHy I mentioned caaflog so we can have well placed rDs. 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Neal Puckett <neal@puckettfaraj.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 08:23:14 
To: Montalvo Eric<eric@puckettfaraj.com>
Subject: Fwd: Supreme Court Ruling Today


Can you help?

Neal A. Puckett
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
703.706.9566

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Atwood Marcy <marcy@puckettfaraj.com>
> Date: March 2, 2011 7:16:04 EST
> To: Neal Puckett <neal@puckettfaraj.com>
> Subject: Supreme Court Ruling Today
> 

> N, here's a story this am on Supreme Court overturning Fed Appeals Court on USERRA action of Employee being fired by proxy after clearly showing immediate supervisor was anti-military.  15 year technician in hospital, in reserves from 1985, activated in 2003 and fired when he got home.  Am struggling with the "so what" in terms of legal analysis of the import of this ruling. 
> 
> M
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Marcelyn Atwood
> Business Manager 
> 
> The Law Firm of Puckett & Faraj, PC
> 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 210
> Alexandria, VA 22314 
> 
> 703-706-9566 ; FAX 202-318-7652 ; marcy@puckettfaraj.com
> Please View our Website:  www.puckettfaraj.com
> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>