[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mtn to reconsider 120 issue
- To: Christian Hur <christian.hur@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Mtn to reconsider 120 issue
- From: Douglas Wacker <douglas.wacker@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:38:59 -0800
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of douglas.wacker@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=douglas.wacker@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Cc: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
- Delivered-to: haytham@puckettfaraj.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=eveIXpgwjszcPzQ5QvTXj8xqtd29NPlZLqpMuaGuVj0=; b=OaovuNBl6DXprkCA0Tng2dIPejGZXT6ysuUqPB6CeGu3DNbTViXTP5/35Up+y8QLOL Y9q4GKzNEKUO32+zXD6WoVTWE09amtnhqZeyY5YLo6EoVbcEobbcdobjGt2Z7d+XJ3S3 k1ZMmi169dLQ+jaCtrT5zDuUlQvoj5/uTcGyY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=LNEV+GEXH5I0uTPB/+F82/WTG3RZ7cpjuAmN/EoeOB7Y0AFNfSI5935cOU9JNqNpcb B23OaaNwjjjkESFNWbI4kBXfHrHvezE1YtZA7tdszhPwHNXeBS86c4RtwXeCkVAoXAmD 52AOdaX+keZkKF90MOdG90ST78tDcenfVr1ms=
The substantive charges in my case of 80 and 120 are from pre-2007. The Prather case covers the language used in the government's post-2007 language in specs 1-3 of Art.133, which use "substantial incapacitation".
So, what is left is 80 (Easley), 120 (Brooder), 133 Lying to USD about sexual intercourse.
-dsw