[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Government Response to Defense Motion for Continuance (11JAN11) ICO U.S. v. Wuterich



Thanks for handling this matter expeditiously, Judge.  Will see you in CA in April, if not before (in Okinawa).
V/r,
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Jones LtCol David M wrote:

All,

The joint continuance is granted.

R,

LtCol David M. Jones
Military Judge
Western Pacific Judicial Circuit
Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Office: 645-7287 / 2156
Fax: 645-2035
From the U.S.: 81-611-745-7287 / 2156


-----Original Message-----
From: Gannon Maj Nicholas L
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 10:26
To: Jones LtCol David M
Cc: Neal Puckett; Haytham Faraj; Sullivan LtCol Sean; Dunn Maj Sean R; Marshall Maj Meridith L
Subject: Government Response to Defense Motion for Continuance (11JAN11) ICO U.S. v. Wuterich

Your Honor,

Thank you for taking time to hold an RCM 802 conference today on such notice. Pursuant to our discussion, attached is the government's response to the defense motion for a continuance of 11 Jan 2001.  

Enclosure 1 to the motion is the defense request for a continuance of 11 Jan 2011.  Enclosure 2 to the motion is the briefing schedule ordered by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces of 11 Jan 2011.  

Have an excellent day Your Honor.      


Very respectfully submitted,
Major Gannon




<Wuterich Joint Cont Request Ruling 14 Jan 11.pdf>