| OK. So now we have a "known known," vice a "known unknown." I suspect the timing of this was no coincidence, and was intended to serve as a roadmap for both parties in Wuterich. I've read it, sort of understand it, but having trouble reasoning through how it applies to our situation with Vokey. Can they focus on the real severance (his forced retirement) rather than the later conflict severance "for good cause shown on the record?" Neal A. Puckett, Esq LtCol, USMC (Ret) Puckett & Faraj, PC 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 703.706.9566 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. On Jan 11, 2011, at 6:50 PM, DHSULLIVAN@aol.com wrote: Gentlemen,
I wanted to make sure you had seen CAAF's Hutchins opinon:
Semper Fi,
DHS |