|
Gentlemen, Iâm going through the governmentâs brief now.Â
Unfortunately Iâm heading to Fort Leavenworth tomorrow and I donât
know if Iâll be able to do the reply brief before then. Itâs due
NLT Monday. The governmentâs statement of facts makes the erroneous
statement that there was never an interruption in the attorney-client
relationship with Vokey. We provided portions of the record demonstrating thatâs
not true. Hereâs my question for the moment. The government
says (page 11):Â âAs Appellant concedes he
was never misadvised about his rights to detailed defense counsel, Appellantâs request for relief must be denied.â When did
we concede that? We relied on Jonesâ language that the counsel and Judge
Meeks did misunderstand the law. Any idea what this sentence is talking about? Semper Fi, DHS |