Re: Wuterich denial of stay request and request for continuance

[Neal Puckett <neal@puckettfaraj.com>]

Yeah. He granted the continuance yesterday and Gannon's folks immediately started turning off travel last night. We're not going to trial on Tues. 

Neal A. Puckett
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
703.706.9566

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:44, "Marshall Maj Meridith L" <meridith.marshall@usmc.mil> wrote:

> Wow.
> 
> Major Meridith L. Marshall
> Senior Defense Counsel
> MCAS, Miramar
> 858-577-1720
> meridith.marshall@usmc.mil 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neal Puckett [mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com] 
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:32 AM
> To: Jones LtCol David M
> Cc: Gannon Maj Nicholas L; Faraj Haytham; Marshall Maj Meridith L
> Subject: Re: Wuterich denial of stay request and request for continuance
> 
> It's a little confusing. The original stay request was denied but the one we were talking about last night is still pending. That's the writ you got yesterday.  Still might get a stay order today or Monday and still set for 39a in Tues morning and still ready for trial on 24 Jan 2011. 
> V/r,
> 
> Neal A. Puckett
> LtCol, USMC (Ret)
> Puckett & Faraj, PC
> 703.706.9566
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:28, "Jones LtCol David  M" <david.m.jones5@usmc.mil> wrote:
> 
>> All,
>> 
>> I understand that the stay was denied.  I would now like to know why we can't do this case on Tuesday?  I want an immediate 802 conference.  I am at my office right now.  Major Gannon, why can't we do this case as planned?
>> 
>> R,
>> 
>> LtCol David M. Jones
>> Military Judge
>> Western Pacific Judicial Circuit
>> Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
>> Office: 645-7287 / 2156
>> Fax: 645-2035
>> From the U.S.: 81-611-745-7287 / 2156 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Puckett Neal [mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com] 
>> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 8:21
>> To: Jones LtCol David M
>> Cc: Gannon Maj Nicholas L; Faraj Haytham; Marshall Maj Meridith L
>> Subject: Wuterich denial of stay request and request for continuance
>> 
>> Your Honor,
>> Was handed this attachment late this afternoon.  Col Dwight Sullivan reads this as this in two ways.  Since you issued your ruling so quickly after our petition was submitted in anticipation of having to wait for a ruling until 2 Nov, the Court is telling us that now that you have the order, we invite you to submit your petition for relief (Ex Writ) from the military judge's denial of the motion for appropriate relief.  The original petition for a stay was to allow us enough time to file our petition for extraordinary relief.  He believes that the other thing they're telling us is that IF we still want to submit it (now that we have your ruling), they plan to take it up and issue a stay if one is requested, since it will take a bit of time.  The usual language when denying such a petition is to tell the petitioner that he is free to raise the issue in the normal course of an appeal, or words to that effect.  This language is unique, in his experience.  We will have the petition filed by COB tomorrow.  We expect that NMCCA will issue a stay either on Friday or on Monday.  But in either case, I believe that both the government and the defense would prefer some degree of certainty for planning purposes.  For that reason, the defense respectfully requests a continuance until NMCCA has a chance to rule on the petition for extraordinary relief which will be filed tomorrow, and which will request a stay of the proceedings (which NMCCA did not foreclose in the attached order).
>> Bottom line is that smarter folks than me (read:  Dwight Sullivan), say it is inevitable that the court will grant our second (and now ripe) request for a stay AND will grant our petition to consider your ruling.
>> Will be on the phone in 10 min for better, perhaps more coherent explanation.
>> 
>> V/r,
>> Neal A. Puckett, Esq
>> LtCol, USMC (Ret)
>> Puckett & Faraj, PC
>> 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
>> Alexandria, VA 22314
>> 703-706-9566
>> 
>> 
>> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.
>> <Wuterich Writ 2.doc>