[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Hutchins type ruling
WOW!! I hadn't seen that. Thanks!
A request for a remedy to bring Colby back into the case (or to abate proceedings until Colby is brought back into the case) would be susceptible to a petition for writ of mandamus in a way that seeking dismissal as a remedy would not. In fact, a large percentage of the few petitions for extraordinary relief that have actually been granted since Clinton v. Goldsmith have involved interference with counsel issues.
I'll be more than happy to assist in the appellate arena, assuming (as I do) that the head of Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Defense (CAPT Paul LeBlanc) agrees to detail me to the case.
Semper Fi,
Dwight
-----Original Message-----
From: Puckett Neal [mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 2:59 PM
To: Sullivan, Dwight H CIV USAF AFLOA/JAJA
Cc: Faraj Haytham; Marshall Meridith
Subject: Hutchins type ruling
Dwight,
Have you seen the ruling in the Hohman (attached below)? Wondering if I could get your opinion about it's efficacy and comparison with our facts. Also, Haytham is considering readying an extraordinary writ (mandamus) to force Judge Jones to follow the Hutchins ruling in granting some form of relief if he denies our motion. Does such a motion lie in our case? If so, can you assist with its preparation as our appellate counsel?
S/f,
Neal
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566
www.puckettfaraj.com
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
Date: September 20, 2010 2:23:16 PM EDT
To: "'Puckett Neal'" <neal@puckettfaraj.com>, "'Marshall Maj Meridith L'" <meridith.marshall@usmc.mil>
Cc: "'Vokey Colby'" <cvokey@fhsulaw.com>
Subject: RE: RE:
Haytham Faraj, Esq.
PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC
_______________________
WASHINGTON DC METRO
1800 Diagonal Road
Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-0442 Phone
DETROIT METRO
6200 Schaefer Road
Suite 202
Dearborn, MI 48126
313-457-1390 Phone
202-280-1039 Fax
www.puckettfaraj.com <http://www.puckettfaraj.com/>
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.