Re: My Hutchins motion

["Joseph H. Low IV" <jhlowiv@aol.com>]

I agree.  I believe judge sanzi will dismiss today.  Wait and see.

Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

>The strongest argument is within the law.  It's almost mathematical.  RCM
>506a provides an absolute right to "detailed" AND "civilian counsel"  RCM
>505(d)(2)(B) states that once AC forms it cannot be severed except for good
>cause.  U.S. v. Baca defines good cause as extraordinary circumstances.
>U.S. v. Hutchins says are you fucking kidding me?  You really want to me to
>believe that EAS is an extraordinary circumstance?  EAS is a very common
>occurrence and therefore not an extraordinary circumstance.  AC cannot be
>severed by mere departure from the military.  I think that is the strongest
>argument available and one that can only be remedied by a dismissal of the
>charges.  U.S. v. Lewis calls for dismissal because when the government
>improperly achieves an unlawful objective -removal of an effective counsel
>would be improper- the only remedy is dismissal.
>
> 
>
>Enjoy!
>
> 
>
>Haytham Faraj, Esq.
>
>PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC
>
>_______________________
>
>WASHINGTON DC METRO
>
>1800 Diagonal Road
>
>Suite 210
>
>Alexandria, VA 22314
>
>703-706-0442 Phone
>
> 
>
>DETROIT METRO
>
>6200 Schaefer Road
>
>Suite 202
>
>Dearborn, MI 48126 
>
>313-457-1390 Phone
>
>202-280-1039 Fax
>
> 
>
> <http://www.puckettfaraj.com/> www.puckettfaraj.com
>
> 
>
>The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is
>intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not
>the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any
>use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly
>prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify
>Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.
>You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making
>any copy or distribution.
>
> 
>