[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Motion to dismiss re. loss of counsel



I sent him an email last night, cc:ing you, in which I asked him NOT to cooperate.  How is that inconsistent with his desire NOT to cooperate?  What is best for the case for our client should be our guide.  Dwight Sullivan believes this is a no-shit real issue in our case.  My position is that Colby should stay home next week in order to make that issue real enough for a chance to win it with Jones.  It really is a moot issue if he's working the case anyway.  There would be no showing of prejudice, which, according to Sullivan, might be the issue that CAAF uses to reverse the Hutchins ruling.  Depending on how Jones handles it, like if he just shuts it down by denying the motion, then we can decide whether to moot the issue by inviting his participation in the trial anyway.  We can't let sentimentalities get in the way of the mission.  I think we should talk about it.  Like you, I also don't want to burn bridges.
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

On Aug 17, 2010, at 12:24 AM, Haytham Faraj wrote:

Colby,
Is not willing to cooperate on this.  He fears being recalled to active duty.  I am not sure why that is because such a course of action is unlikely.  But even if they recall him we can always withdraw the motion which would moot the issue.  I am not sure if there’s something else there.  I’d like to know what your position is on this.  I feel strongly about it because I think it’s a valid issue with merit.
 
Haytham Faraj, Esq.
PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC
_______________________
WASHINGTON DC METRO
1800 Diagonal Road
Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-0442 Phone
 
DETROIT METRO
6200 Schaefer Road
Suite 202
Dearborn, MI 48126
313-457-1390 Phone
202-280-1039 Fax
 
 
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.