by Nathaniel R. Helms | August 14, 2010
One month from now the longest, most
expensive criminal investigation in Marine Corps history will finally come to
an end one way or another at the general court martial of SSgt Frank
Wuterich, the last Marine accused of unlawful killings at Haditha, Iraq on
November 19, 2005.
“When the public sees the truth at this court-martial, it will be
one of the biggest news stories of the year,” said Neal Puckett, the lead
defense attorney in the upcoming court martial. “The truth of the story is
yet to be revealed.”
Almost five years ago, a hidden insurgent remotely triggered a
huge bomb that blew apart a lightly armored Marine Corps “high back” Humvee.
One Marine and 24 Iraqis died in the gruesome exchange that followed. Eleven
Marines were wounded. The virulent press dubbed the incident the “Haditha
Massacre.”
Nine of the decedents were quickly deemed insurgents for their
complicity in staging the attack from a residential neighborhood. The rest of
the victims unfortunately got in the way. The Marines Corps declared victory
the next day in a bland communiqué. Regrettably it was factually wrong, the
first of many factual and procedural mistakes that would follow. The Marine
Corps has been on trial ever since. On September 13 it will have one more
shot at vindication.
During an
interview on the CBS television news show “60 Minutes” Wuterich revealed what
happened that day:
…I
remember there may have been women in there, may have been children in there.
My responsibility as a squad leader is to make sure that none of the rest of
my guys died ... and at that point, we were still on the assault, so no, I
don't believe [I should have stopped the attack].
We went
through that house much the same, prepping the room with grenades, going in
there, and eliminating the threat and engaging the targets…There probably
wasn't [a threat], now that I look back on it. But there, in that time, yes,
I believed there was a threat.
At his
preliminary hearing two years ago Wuterich said he regretted the loss of
civilian life in Haditha, but said he believed he was operating within
military combat rules when he ordered his men to attack.
What happened didn't mean there was criminal intent
Puckett has represented the 30-year old infantryman he calls “the
last Marine standing” since 2006. Funded by almost a quarter of a million
dollars from generous donors, he has never given an inch. Convicting Wuterich
would give the Marine Corps prosecutors who relentlessly pursued his client a
scrap of absolution. Puckett doesn’t intend to provide the Marine Corps
vindication that easily, he said.
“They were acting in accordance with their
training. If errors in judgment were made, you have to give the benefit of
the doubt to the Marines. What happened [at Haditha] doesn’t mean there was
criminal intent,” Puckett explained.
He says the investigation was flawed, the prosecution ignored
exculpatory evidence uncovered by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service,
and his client was the victim of undue command influence, the same judicial
stain that set Wuterich’s commanding officer free last month.
Wuterich is charged with voluntary manslaughter, aggravated
assault, reckless endangerment, dereliction of duty and obstruction of
justice for leading the squad that killed the Iraqis. He was the squad leader
in Kilo Company, 3 Battalion, 1st Marines who lead three of his
men on a house clearing attack after his four vehicle resupply convoy was
ambushed. He is currently assigned to administrative work at 1st Marine
Division headquarters at Camp Pendleton. The young Marine who put his future
on hold to defend his country has already lost more than most; his wife, his
family, and his home. The Marine Corps still wants his life. If convicted
Wuterich could spend most of it in prison.
Vast powers of the government versus one Marine
Wuterich has already overcome tremendous
odds. The NCIS maintained both a field investigation and an oversight
committee in Washington that kept tabs on the progress of the investigation.
NCIS officials acknowledged during the preliminary investigation that at
least 65 special agents were occupied with the case at its zenith in the
summer of 2006. The government has spent untold millions of dollars and
thousands of man hours without proving its case. Over time the so-called
Haditha massacre that never happened fell off the public’s radar screen.
Closely monitoring the situation was
former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who formed a study group to
determine what to do after the late Pennsylvania Congressman John Murtha
accused the Marines involved of massacre and cover-up. He used the occasion
to attack the war policies of former President George W. Bush.
Rumsfeld’s hastily assembled study group’s
analysis of the political and legal situation was used to help decide what
course of action to take against eight Marines ultimately accused of massacre
and cover up in the deaths of the Iraqis.
The group was briefed by high ranking
Marine Corps lawyers sent by Brigadier General Kevin Sandkuhler, Staff Judge
Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps at the time. Also in the mix
was Peter M. Murphy, former General Counsel to the Marine Corps--a civilian
who counseled Commandants and their lawyers for 20 years. Both men have since
retired. The odds makers said the Haditha Eight didn’t stand a chance.
Puckett wouldn’t say precisely how he plans to prevail, although
he offered a few hints. For one thing he’s gathered a Dream Team of
experienced military trial attorneys and military law experts. His team
includes two retired Marine lawyers, an international law expert, and an active
duty major appointed to the proceedings.
Among them is Colby Vokey, another retired Marine lieutenant
colonel that was so effective representing Wuterich and the other defendants
during the preliminary hearings in 2007 he was fired until the uproar from
prominent military jurists forced the Marine Corps to reinstate him.
Also on the team is retired Major Haytham Faraj, Puckett’s partner
and a dogged interrogator. Faraj served 22 years in the Corps before retiring
as the senior military defense counsel at Camp Pendleton, CA.
Also on board is Mark S. Zaid, an international law expert who
usually takes on government intelligence agencies for a living. All three
lawyers were familiar names and faces when the international press descended
on Camp Pendleton after the hearings began in May, 2007.
The latest addition to the team is Major Meredith Marshall, the
senior defense attorney at Miramar Naval Air Station. She was appointed by
the Marine Corps as military counsel for Wuterich. She is the only newcomer in
the mix and the only female lawyer to participate in the case.
Arrayed against them is the prosecution team led by Lieutenant
Colonel Sean Sullivan, a former reservist who decided to remain in the Corps
and give up his civilian practice in Chicago. He has the resources of the
entire prosecutorial apparatus of the Department of Defense at his disposal.
Sullivan and his stable of prosecutors have tangled with Puckett before.
There is no love lost.
Wuterich didn't kill anyone
At stake is a lot more than the guilt or innocence of Wuterich.
Puckett plans to put the proceedings on trial as well. Seven times the
government has brought Marines who fought at Haditha before the bar and seven
times they have been set free (the eighth had charges dropped against him).
That by itself says something, he noted.
“The
mindset of those guys was no being policemen. Cops go through scenarios about
shoot or not shoot during a hostage rescue. This was not a hostage rescue.
They had received fire from those houses and that made them hostile and a
hostile house is a target. They could have called an airstrike on House #1.
That has always been an integral part of our case,” Puckett said.
The
forensic evidence gathered at the crime scene months after the engagement
will show that Wuterich did not kill anyone, Puckett added.
“In a
murder investigation the deceased usually has one or more bullet holes in
them. The cops like to match the bullets that made them to a handgun and the
gun to the suspect. It is the same thing here. When you charge a Marine with
shooting someone – murder - you want to be able to say who did it; the weapon
with this serial number was issued to this Marine who was there on a certain
day. There are no bullets or other forensic evidence that shows Wuterich shot
anyone,” Puckett said.
Another
issue is the onus of command influence that is yet to be resolved, Puckett
said
On March 23, 2010 Wuterich won a key ruling that still
could lead to the dropping of the case. Lieutenant Colonel David Jones, a
military judge who heard the motion to dismiss the charges against Wuterich
ruled his lawyers had successfully shown that there was the evidence of the
same undue command influence that set his commanding officer free. Even so
Jones ruled against a
motion to dismiss the case during a hearing at Camp Pendleton and ordered
Wuterich to stand trial.
During the two-day hearing General Mattis and retired Lieutenant
General Samuel Helland, who supported Mattis’ decisions when he took over command
form the distinguished officer was promoted testified the government was not
improperly influenced. Faraj said it was to the Marine Corps' credit that
Mattis was ordered to undergo cross-examination about the case. It is unusual
for a four-star general to be called to the witness stand.
A
military judge dismissed charges of dereliction of duty and orders violations
against Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey Chessani in June 2008 after finding that
undue command influence had sullied his case. Chessani the highest ranking
and last officer to be accused of criminal behavior retired in July. The
father of seven was the battalion commander of 3/1 before being relieved for
cause in late March 2006. Twice the government unsuccessfully appealed
the ruling and ordered him before a non-judicial Board of Inquiry before it
finally called off its relentless pursuit.
“Unlawful command influence is the mortal enemy of military
justice,” said military judge Colonel Steven Folsom at the time. “In order to
restore the public confidence, we need to take it back. We need to turn the
clock back.”
Folsom determined General James N. Mattis had tainted the
proceedings when he was the convening authority who sent Chessani and the
other defendants to court-martial.
The charges against two other 3/1 officers were dismissed during
preliminary hearings when the government could not produce enough evidence to
make their case. Lieutenant Andrew Grayson, an intelligence officer and
the only Marine to go to court martial, was found not guilty of impeding the
investigation and trying to sneak out of the Marine Corps, perhaps the
zaniest charge the case spawned.
At the time Puckett said his client "is in good spirits. He
hasn't complained at all. He loves the Marine Corps and wants to make it a
career."
Puckett
said the court martial is scheduled to last three weeks. The government has
called 47 witnesses, including former defendants, forensic investigators, and
immunized 3/1 Marines who testified in the past. Among the witnesses on the
list is Jeffrey Chessani, Wuterich’s battalion commander who retired in July
after being exonerated of criminal charges.
__________________________________________
Nathaniel R. Helms
Defend
Our Marines
14 August 2010
Note: Nat Helms is a Contributing Editor to Defend Our Marines. He is a Vietnam
veteran, former police officer, war correspondent, and, most recently, author
of My
Men Are My Heroes: The Brad Kasal Story (Meredith Books, 2007).
|