Sir, Gov't response to DC motion to compel. v/r, Lt McGuire -----Original Message----- From: White Capt Bret A Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 17:30 To: Mcguire 1stLt Maryann N Subject: RE: Govt Motion response_ US v. SSgt Lopez haytham@puckettfaraj.com -----Original Message----- From: Mcguire 1stLt Maryann N Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 17:29 To: White Capt Bret A Subject: RE: Govt Motion response_ US v. SSgt Lopez Sir, Can you please forward this to Mr. Faraj as I am having difficulties locating his email address. Thank You. v/r, Lt McGuire -----Original Message----- From: Mcguire 1stLt Maryann N Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 17:27 To: 'Hale, Charles C LtCol TRIJUDACT, NDW'; charles.Hale@osd.mil; Hale LtCol Charles C Cc: Miller Sgt Dan R; Presley Sgt Zane A; Porter, Dana M SSgt TRIJUDACT, WNYD; White Capt Bret A Subject: Govt Motion response_ US v. SSgt Lopez Good Afternoon Sir, Attached is the government's response to the defense motion to compel witnesses in the US v. SSgt Lopez case. There is no 39(a) on the docket to litigate these motions. A new PTO has not been signed since the continuance was granted pushing the trial dates forward to 3-12 August. I will confer with defense and submit a PTIR to docket a 39(a) session. Very Respectfully, Maryann N. McGuire First Lieutenant, U.S. Marine Corps Trial Counsel Office of the Staff Judge Advocate Marine Corps Base, Quantico 703-784-3675
Attachment:
LOPEZ_GOVT_RESP_MOT_TO_COMPEL.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature