Sallaun Group v Treasury, et al.

To: "'Haytham Faraj'" <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>

Subject: Sallaun Group v Treasury, et al.

From: "MaryJo Provenzano" <maryjo1@puckettfaraj.com>

Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:31:20 -0500

Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning maryjo1@puckettfaraj.com does not designate 209.85.220.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=maryjo1@puckettfaraj.com

Delivered-to: haytham@puckettfaraj.com

Thread-index: AcykhY154mEcYVa2Rt6kl0BR+XkXxQ==

Haytham:
I attach a redlined revised Complaint that is still very much a draft and a recent case from Ohio that has an exhaustive history of case law on OFAC seizures and distinguishes unfavorable cases in DDC for your review. I understand you are working on something else today. Maybe we can talk about it while you are here.

Mary Jo Provenzano

Paralegal

PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC

1800 Diagonal Road

Suite 210

Alexandria, VA 22314

703-706-0442 Phone

202-280-1039 Fax

www.puckettfaraj.com

DC ׀ CA ׀ MI ׀ VA

twitter.com/puckettfaraj

Practice is limited to matters and proceedings before special courts - federal courts - agencies. Confidentiality / Privilege Notice: This transmission, including attachments, is intended solely for the use of the designated recipient(s). This transmission may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The use or disclosure of the information contained in this transmission for any purpose other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this transmission, please immediately destroy all copies received and notify the sender.

Attachment: Complaint 0001.11-8-2011.docx
Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document