RE: Litton Article 32

["Haytham Faraj" <Haytham@puckettfaraj.com>]

Thank you.  That's great news.  I look forward to working with you again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peltz Capt Timothy [mailto:timothy.peltz@usmc.mil] 
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 12:13 PM
To: Haytham Faraj
Cc: Henderson Capt Clayton K
Subject: RE: Litton Article 32

Just spoke with command, they are going with a 6105, charges will be
withdrawn and dismissed w/o prejudice...once signed I will pass along the
letter 

-----Original Message-----
From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 16:27
To: Peltz Capt Timothy
Cc: Henderson Capt Clayton K
Subject: Re: Litton Article 32

An SCM is reasonable but not with a board waiver. Let me know and I'll
sell it to him. 

Haytham Faraj 
Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 1, 2011, at 7:03 PM, "Peltz Capt Timothy" <timothy.peltz@usmc.mil>
wrote:

> Gentlemen,
> 
> Just read the IO report and do not disagree...I think Command will
accept the SCM. Would your client accept this? Not positive but Command is
willing to consider not AdSeping, however if they choose to would Litton
be willing to waive his board? Thanks.


> 
> v/r,
> Blake
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cory R. Weck [mailto:crw@wtw-law.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 14:34
> To: Haytham Faraj; Peltz Capt Timothy
> Cc: Henderson Capt Clayton K
> Subject: RE: Litton Article 32 
> 
> Gents,
> 
> 
> 
> Attached is the 32 Report re: Litton.  Please advise if any questions.
> 
> 
> 
> S/F
> 
> 
> 
> Maj. Weck
> 
> 
> 
> Cory R. Weck
> 
> Attorney at Law
> 
> Welebir Tierney & Weck, PLC
> 
> 2068 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 215
> 
> Redlands, CA 92374
> 
> Office:909-335-0444
> 
> Fax: 909-335-0452
> 
> Cory R. Weck
> 
> Attorney at Law
> Welebir Tierney & Weck, PLC
> 2068 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 215
> Redlands, CA 92374
> Office:909-335-0444
> Fax: 909-335-0452
> 
>