Re: Litton Article 32

[Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>]

An SCM is reasonable but not with a board waiver. Let me know and I'll sell it to him. 

Haytham Faraj 
Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 1, 2011, at 7:03 PM, "Peltz Capt Timothy" <timothy.peltz@usmc.mil> wrote:

> Gentlemen,
> 
> Just read the IO report and do not disagree...I think Command will accept the SCM. Would your client accept this? Not positive but Command is willing to consider not AdSeping, however if they choose to would Litton be willing to waive his board? Thanks.
> 
> v/r,
> Blake
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cory R. Weck [mailto:crw@wtw-law.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 14:34
> To: Haytham Faraj; Peltz Capt Timothy
> Cc: Henderson Capt Clayton K
> Subject: RE: Litton Article 32 
> 
> Gents,
> 
> 
> 
> Attached is the 32 Report re: Litton.  Please advise if any questions.
> 
> 
> 
> S/F
> 
> 
> 
> Maj. Weck
> 
> 
> 
> Cory R. Weck
> 
> Attorney at Law
> 
> Welebir Tierney & Weck, PLC
> 
> 2068 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 215
> 
> Redlands, CA 92374
> 
> Office:909-335-0444
> 
> Fax: 909-335-0452
> 
> Cory R. Weck
> 
> Attorney at Law
> Welebir Tierney & Weck, PLC
> 2068 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 215
> Redlands, CA 92374
> Office:909-335-0444
> Fax: 909-335-0452
> 
>