RE: Saleh (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>]

I'm not inclined to stipulate to anything unless I see what the stipulation
is in writing.  He my write a stipulation and send it. If it is relevant,
does not prejudice our client by denying us an opportunity to cross, and
saves time then I will probably agree to it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas, Laquisha S CPT MIL USA FORSCOM
[mailto:laquisha.douglas@us.army.mil] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 10:06 PM
To: Haytham Faraj
Subject: Saleh (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO

Haytham,

When I was at CID today, CPT Wright wanted to know if we were interested
to stipulating to the admissibility of anything in order to avoid having
to call certain witnesses, ie., chain of custody for items that we are
not disputing. Specifically he referred to the DNA and fingerprints. I
told him that I would let you know they were interested in doing that.

Also, please send any future e-mails to my gmail account so that I can
access it while I am gone.



V/R,

CPT Laquisha Douglas
Defense Counsel
Fort Irwin Field Office
U.S. Army Trial Defense Service
P: 760-380-4199
F: 760-380-5901


Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO