[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: U.S. v. Burke - Second Discovery Request



Make sure the discovery request they sent you meets all the requirements per the Rule.  In fact, go ahead and deny it like prosecutors normally do.  DENIED: Irrelevant, overbroad, does not meet the requirements as set forth by the MCM.

 

From: Puckett Neal [mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:06 PM
To: Kouba, Dustin B Capt USAF ACC 7 BW/JA
Cc: Ranae Capt USAF AFLOA AFLOA/ADC Doser-Pascual L; Faraj Haytham
Subject: Re: U.S. v. Burke - Second Discovery Request

 

Dustin,

You mean Gen Spears isn't dismissing the charges?

V/r,

Neal A. Puckett, Esq

LtCol, USMC (Ret)

Puckett & Faraj, PC

1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210

Alexandria, VA 22314

703.706.9566

 

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

 

On Jul 6, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Kouba, Dustin B Capt USAF ACC 7 BW/JA wrote:



Mr. Puckett and Capt D-P,

 

Attached please find the Government’s Second Discovery Request dated 6 July 2011.

 

v/r,

 

Dustin B. Kouba, Capt, USAF

Chief, Adverse Actions

7 Lancer Loop, Ste 223

Dyess AFB, TX 79607

DSN:  461-2035

Comm:  325-696-2035

 

<Second Discovery Request 6 Jul 11 - Burke.pdf>