[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: U.S. v. Wacker UCI findings
Doug.
SJA to CMC received the findings. Not surprises by Jones' skewed findings. Col Smith is looking for employment post Marine Corps I found out today from sources. Not sure what that means for her though. While I am very interested in your case and continue to follow it.
Haytham Faraj
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2011, at 6:24 PM, "Wacker Capt Douglas S" <douglas.wacker@usmc.mil> wrote:
> Haytham,
>
> I've spoken to Chris about this, but wanted to hear your take.
>
> Are you sending the findings of fact for UCI to Col Baker or MajGen Ary or the IGMC or JAG IG? Is there anyone else who should receive this? And if so, what other materials need to accompany it.
>
> I was interested to see that Judge Jones used very loose terminology to state (or rather to not state) that Col Smith lied on the stand as controverted by SA Burge, LtCol Trapp, Maj Blalock and Maj Budomo, along with the testimony of the "two inexperienced" litigants, Maj Bueno and Capt Ahn.
>
> I am focused on the clemency issue right now, but for the future what is the process of an ex writ to NMCCA? Is there a timeline? I know there is a two-year period for a 69(b) appeal to SJA to CMC.
>
> S/F
>
> Doug
>
> Douglas S. Wacker
> Captain, USMC
> Future Operations Officer
> MWHS-3, 3D MAW
> douglas.wacker@usmc.mil
> Wk: 858-577-6730
> DSN: 267-6730
> Cell: 858-401-9392
>
> "Don't tell people how to do things, tell them what to do and let them surprise you with their results." ~George S. Patton
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hur Capt Christian P
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 8:38
> To: Wacker Capt Douglas S; douglas.wacker@gmail.com
> Subject: FW: U.S. v. Wacker UCI findings
>
>
> FYI
>
> Christian P. Hur
> Captain, USMC
> Senior Defense Counsel
> Telephone: (619) 524-8713
> Fax: (619) 524-6784
> Address: Defense Section, Bldg 12, 1st Floor, MCRD, San Diego, CA 92140
>
> This email may contain Attorney Work Product. Please delete if you received this message in error.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones LtCol David M
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 7:27
> To: Haytham Faraj
> Cc: Sullivan LtCol Sean; Day Capt Evan S; Hur Capt Christian P
> Subject: RE: U.S. v. Wacker UCI findings
>
> Counsel,
>
> Here is my ruling on the UCI motion for Wacker. Government, please attach this as the next Appellate Exhibit in order. Thank you.
>
> R,
>
> LtCol David M. Jones
> Military Judge
> Western Pacific Judicial Circuit
> Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
> Office: 645-7287 / 2156
> Fax: 645-2035
> From the U.S.: 81-611-745-7287 / 2156
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 22:30
> To: Jones LtCol David M
> Cc: Sullivan LtCol Sean; Day Capt Evan S; Hur Capt Christian P
> Subject: U.S. v. Wacker UCI findings
>
> Your honor,
>
> I am writing to inquire as to whether you will be writing findings of fact regarding the 39a hearing we had on February 22-24. If you are, do you have an estimate of when you expect to have them completed?
>
>
>
> Vr,
>
>
>
> Haytham Faraj, Esq.
>
> PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC
>
> _______________________
>
> WASHINGTON DC METRO
>
> The Law Firm of Puckett & Faraj, PC
>
> 1800 Diagonal Road
>
> Suite 210
>
> Alexandria, VA 22314
>
> 703-706-0442 Phone
>
> 202-280-1039 Fax
>
>
>
> DETROIT METRO
>
> The Law Firm of Puckett & Faraj, PC
>
> P.O. Box 1016
>
> Dearborn Heights, MI 48127
>
> 313-457-1390 Phone
>
> 202-280-1039 Fax
>
>
>
>
>
> www.puckettfaraj.com <http://www.puckettfaraj.com/>
>
>
>
> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.
>
>
>