RE: update on witnesses

[Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>]

I am all about disclosing everything to witnesses that way they're not
surprised by the inevitable cross examination questions that will be asked.
Telephonic is better than statements because the members can also ask
questions.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Gough, Charles C LTJG NLSO NC DET, GREAT LAKES
[mailto:charles.c.gough@navy.mil] 
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 9:33 AM
To: Haytham Faraj
Subject: update on witnesses

Mr. Faraj,
Just an update, I've called the following recruits: Tabitha Bonner, Chandra
Tremayne, Danielle Craig, and Nieves Medrano. I left messages with all them.
Ms. Craig got back to me and said she'd been called by Miriam already (there
were two Craigs that Wofford gave me) but that she'd call me today.  

Also, I've confirmed that Richard Randall, (a former senior chief) LT Shaun
Dennis, and CDR Mark Terrell would all be willing and able to be character
witnesses. Should we plan on having them get us letters or testify
telephonically? Also, if telephonically, how much information as to the
charges and evidence should we give them? Should I give them the charge
sheets, or is that too much? Thanks. 
V/R,
LT Gough

Charles C. Gough
LT, JAGC, USN
Naval Legal Service Office North Central 
Detachment Great Lakes 
2540 Paul Jones Street, Bldg 2, Ste 100
Great Lakes, IL 60088
(847) 688-4753, extension 108


FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Privacy Sensitive - Any misuse or unauthorized
disclosure can result in both civil and criminal penalties.

NOTICE: This e-mail communication is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain unclassified confidential and/or
attorney-client privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying
or dissemination of this communication is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender by telephone or e-mail and
delete all copies received.