|
Who is this moron. Dude this is the dark side of
America. Go back a 100 years and these guys are dressed in sheets burning
crosses. From: Puckett Neal
[mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com] Wow. People are going to be so disappointed when they
find out that Mr. Paul Jensen (Lakin's first "attorney") misinformed
them as to the "Obama defense," by suggesting that there was such a
thing. They'll think I just don't get it. ;-) Neal A. Puckett, Esq LtCol, USMC (Ret) Puckett &
Faraj, PC 1800 Diagonal Rd,
Suite 210 Alexandria, VA
22314 703.706.9566 The information contained in
this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of
disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this
communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005
or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this
E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Marcy wrote: FYI, M Marcelyn Atwood Business Manager The Law Firm of
Puckett & Faraj, PC 1800 Diagonal Road,
Suite 210 Alexandria, VA
22314 703-706-9566 ; FAX
202-318-7652 ; marcy@puckettfaraj.com Please View our
Website: www.puckettfaraj.com
and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/puckettfaraj The information contained in this
electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of
disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this
communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566
or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this
E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. Begin forwarded message:
From:
"Paula
Gordon" <pgordon@starpower.net> Date:
October
7, 2010 4:18:45 PM EDT To:
<info@puckettfaraj.com> Subject:
FW: Eligibility questions
Neal A.
Puckett, Esq. and Haytham Faraj, Esq. Puckett and
Faraj Military Lawyers 1800
Diagonal Road, STE 210 Alexandria,
VA 22314 Dear
Counselors: Thanks so
very much for your efforts on behalf
of Lt. Col. Lakin. Some key
points I wished to
be able to share with you, points
(highlighted below) that did not appear to be well understood by the
Colonel’s previous counsel: · Being a “native
born citizen” is not the same as “natural born citizen.” · Many
people do not understand that there is a difference between a "native born
citizen" and a "natural born citizen". Constitutional
experts say that a "natural born citizen" is one
who was born in the U.S. to parents
both of whom were American citizens. A person is a
"native born citizen" if that person was born in the U.S. or if
his parents were abroad in the service of the country when he was born. · All
"native born citizens" are not "natural born
citizens". According to respected Constitutional scholars, those who
held “dual citizenship” at birth do not qualify as "natural
born citizens" because both parents were not American
citizens. For further information on the meaning given to the phrase
“natural born citizen” by the Founders in Article 2, Section 1 of
the Constitution, see http://eligibilityquestions.com . A
number of prospective Presidential or Vice Presidential candidates are not
“natural born citizens” under the Founders’ definition of the
“natural born citizen.” This would include Governor Jindal, neither of whose parents were
naturalized American citizens at the time of his birth in the U.S. · Assuming Barack Obama, Sr. was Mr. Obama’s father, the
key question is whether or not Mr. Obama’s apparent
“dual citizenship” at birth renders him ineligible for the
Presidency. · In Mr. Obama’s case, even if a long form birth
certificate is produced, if it shows that his father was Barack Obama, Sr.,
then he was a “dual citizen” at birth. If it shows that he was born
in the United States, then it means that even though he was a “native
born citizen” at birth, he was not a “natural born citizen”
since his father was not a U.S. citizen making him a “dual citizen”
at birth. · Even if Mr. Obama was a “native
born” citizen at birth but not a “dual citizen” at birth, questions would persist concerning the status of his citizenship from childhood through the
present owing to his adoption during his childhood by an Indonesian citizen. · If he was born in the US and if his father had been an
American citizen, then other questions would still remain since he was adopted
by his step father when he was a child and lived in Indonesia. The status of his citizenship
from his childhood through his adulthood are still in question. If he was
a citizen of Indonesia, when did he give up his citizenship? Was it
necessary for him to reinstate his American citizenship? Did he do
so? If he did give up his Indonesian citizenship and if he was necessary
for him to reinstate his American citizenship and if he reinstated his
citizenship; he would be eligible to run for the Senate, but if his status
changed to that of “naturalized citizen”, there would be a question
concerning eligibility to be President. The following website at http://eligibilityquestions.com addresses many of
these questions. There is an “Open Letter to the Media and Public
Officials..” there that seeks to clarify some of the many reasons that
the media and public officials, including members of the judiciary have done
such a poor job in the recent past of addressing these eligibility-related
matters. I hope that this information is helpful. Please feel free to contact me at pgordon@starpower.net or 202 241 0631. Sincerely, Paula Gordon Paula
D. Gordon, Ph.D. 6101
16th St. NW, Suite 906 Washington,
D.C. 20011-1766 Phone:
(202) 241 0631 E-Mail: pgordon@starpower.net Websites: |