N, These cases support the position that your client is
entitled to pay. This holding states that he is not entitled to pay in the event
that the accused remains guilty of other charges. Obviously, then, when he
stands convicted of no charges he will be entitled to pay Servicemember was not entitled
to restoration of pay status under Unif. Code Mil. Justice art. 75(a), 10
USCS § 875, after Court of Appeals for Armed Forces set aside his sentence
where servicemember remained convicted of offenses that were affirmed and, thus,
remained subject to inchoate sentence that was pending further review Air
Force Court of Criminal Appeals. United States v Dodge (2005, AFCCA) 60 MJ 873,
2005 CCA LEXIS 21, affd (2005, CAAF) 61
MJ 288, 2005 CAAF LEXIS 681. Haytham Faraj, Esq. PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC _______________________ WASHINGTON DC METRO 1800 Diagonal Road Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 703-706-0442 Phone DETROIT METRO 6200 Schaefer Road Suite 202 Dearborn, MI 48126 313-457-1390 Phone 202-280-1039 Fax The information
contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution,
copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C.
at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are
required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or
distribution. |