RE: My Hutchins motion

[Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>]

Are you in CA?  coming up this afternoon to drop off the bike.

Haytham Faraj, Esq.
PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC
_______________________
WASHINGTON DC METRO
1800 Diagonal Road
Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-0442 Phone

DETROIT METRO
6200 Schaefer Road
Suite 202
Dearborn, MI 48126 
313-457-1390 Phone
202-280-1039 Fax

www.puckettfaraj.com

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.


-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph H. Low IV [mailto:jhlowiv@aol.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 11:00 AM
To: Haytham Faraj
Subject: Re: My Hutchins motion

If he does you will have u.s.supreme case law military court case law and local court case law.  Should be a slam dunk.

Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

>The strongest argument is within the law.  It's almost mathematical.  RCM
>506a provides an absolute right to "detailed" AND "civilian counsel"  RCM
>505(d)(2)(B) states that once AC forms it cannot be severed except for good
>cause.  U.S. v. Baca defines good cause as extraordinary circumstances.
>U.S. v. Hutchins says are you fucking kidding me?  You really want to me to
>believe that EAS is an extraordinary circumstance?  EAS is a very common
>occurrence and therefore not an extraordinary circumstance.  AC cannot be
>severed by mere departure from the military.  I think that is the strongest
>argument available and one that can only be remedied by a dismissal of the
>charges.  U.S. v. Lewis calls for dismissal because when the government
>improperly achieves an unlawful objective -removal of an effective counsel
>would be improper- the only remedy is dismissal.
>
> 
>
>Enjoy!
>
> 
>
>Haytham Faraj, Esq.
>
>PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC
>
>_______________________
>
>WASHINGTON DC METRO
>
>1800 Diagonal Road
>
>Suite 210
>
>Alexandria, VA 22314
>
>703-706-0442 Phone
>
> 
>
>DETROIT METRO
>
>6200 Schaefer Road
>
>Suite 202
>
>Dearborn, MI 48126 
>
>313-457-1390 Phone
>
>202-280-1039 Fax
>
> 
>
> <http://www.puckettfaraj.com/> www.puckettfaraj.com
>
> 
>
>The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is
>intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not
>the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any
>use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly
>prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify
>Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.
>You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making
>any copy or distribution.
>
> 
>