Re: Probably an oversight

[Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>]

It may be a violation but not certain. If the non compete is too restrictive, courts sometimes strike it down. 

Haytham Faraj 
760-521-7934
Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 20, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Michael Dodd <mike.dodd@3dglobalsolutions.net> wrote:

> And is working for a direct competitor also a violation of his non compete?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dodd 
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 10:00 AM
> To: 'Haytham Faraj'
> Subject: FW: Probably an oversight
> 
> Haytham,
> 
> Seems Kevin is in clear violation of the non compete clause of his agreement. And actively calling on 3DGS contacts. Do we file an injunction or something?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Farrell [mailto:kevin@renovasbioenergia.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 11:20 PM
> To: Michael Dodd
> Subject: Probably an oversight
> 
> You still haven't paid me for the month I worked for you.  Probably an error by your payroll company.  It would benefit you to look into it...  Hopefully I will see you at the DESC pre-solicitation conference in Sept.  we can catch up on old times.
> 
> Kevin Farrell
> 
> President
> 
> SEBICS USA
> 
> LOGO RENOVAS Para Firma e-mail
> 
> www.renovasbioenergia.com
> 
> (813) 545-8841
> 
> skype kb.farrell
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> ______________________________________________________________________