|
Hey partner, What I meant by not cooperating is that he wants to be there
next week and to be involved. I meant that he is reluctant to cooperate
with us by remaining engaged. He thinks I could do it. Although in
theory it could be an issue. Practically speaking, I am a member of the firm
that has now taken on representation. We have a retainer agreement with
Frank that Colby doesn’t have. I see me and him as distinct
issues. Speak to him today if you can and let me know what impression you
have. Don’t share with him the substance of this email. I
think the thing to do is for him to stay home next week. There’s
really nothing for him to do any way since he didn’t write any of these
motions. Haytham Faraj, Esq. PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC _______________________ WASHINGTON DC METRO 1800 Diagonal Road Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 703-706-0442 Phone DETROIT METRO 6200 Schaefer Road Suite 202 Dearborn, MI 48126 313-457-1390 Phone 202-280-1039 Fax The information contained in this electronic message is
confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby
notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in
error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return
the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail
immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. From: Puckett Neal
[mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com] I sent him an email last night, cc:ing you, in which I asked
him NOT to cooperate. How is that inconsistent with his desire NOT to
cooperate? What is best for the case for our client should be our guide.
Dwight Sullivan believes this is a no-shit real issue in our case.
My position is that Colby should stay home next week in order to make
that issue real enough for a chance to win it with Jones. It really is a
moot issue if he's working the case anyway. There would be no showing of
prejudice, which, according to Sullivan, might be the issue that CAAF uses to
reverse the Hutchins ruling. Depending on how Jones handles it, like if
he just shuts it down by denying the motion, then we can decide whether to moot
the issue by inviting his participation in the trial anyway. We can't let
sentimentalities get in the way of the mission. I think we should talk
about it. Like you, I also don't want to burn bridges. Neal A. Puckett, Esq LtCol, USMC (Ret) Puckett &
Faraj, PC 1800 Diagonal Rd,
Suite 210 Alexandria, VA
22314 703.706.9566 The information contained in
this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of
disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this
communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005
or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this
E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. On Aug 17, 2010, at 12:24 AM, Haytham Faraj wrote:
Colby, Is
not willing to cooperate on this. He fears being recalled to active
duty. I am not sure why that is because such a course of action is
unlikely. But even if they recall him we can always withdraw the motion
which would moot the issue. I am not sure if there’s something else
there. I’d like to know what your position is on this. I feel
strongly about it because I think it’s a valid issue with merit. Haytham Faraj, Esq. PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC _______________________ WASHINGTON DC METRO 1800 Diagonal Road Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 703-706-0442 Phone DETROIT METRO 6200 Schaefer Road Suite 202 Dearborn, MI 48126 313-457-1390 Phone 202-280-1039 Fax The information contained in this electronic message is
confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby
notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in
error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return
the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately
without reading or making any copy or distribution. |