[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NEAL, PLEASE CALL ME 202 390 5959: 5 potential witnesses could support SEALs accused of abuse HamptonRoads.com PilotOnline.com.htm



Title: 5 potential witnesses could support SEALs accused of abuse | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com

Hampton Roads, VA - 02/20/2010

Scattered Clouds

39Â

Scattered Clouds

Forecasts | Doppler Radar

Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

5 potential witnesses could support SEALs accused of abuse

Posted to: Military News

         Login or register to post comments

 

By Kate Wiltrout
The Virginian-Pilot
 February 20, 2010

NORFOLK

Five sailors could offer testimony contradicting the government's main witness in the controversial prosecution of three Navy SEALs accused of mistreating a suspected Iraqi terrorist.

But whether they'll take the stand is in question after the government denied their requests for immunity on Friday.

Attorney Charles Gittins represents the five potential witnesses, including two officers who led the SEAL detachment that captured Ahmed Hashim Abed in Fallujah in September. Abed is the alleged mastermind of the murders of four Blackwater contractors in Fallujah in 2004.

Gittins said his clients' testimony would be inconsistent with some or all of the statements made by Petty Officer 3rd Class Kevin Demartino, the Navy master-at-arms who claimed to have seen a SEAL hit Abed while he was being held in a U.S. detainee facility after his capture.

"If your intent is to have a fair trial, they are witnesses you'd want to hear from," Gittins said.

Monica Lombardi, who is defending one of the accused SEALs, said the government's decision not to grant immunity to key defense witnesses raises questions about the "fundamental fairness" of the process.

"They contradict a lot of what the government is alleging as having happened," Lombardi said. "Where is the government going with this case, and how are they going to ensure the accused's right to a fair trial?"

The prosecutions of Matthew McCabe, Jonathan Keefe and Julio Huertas, all assigned to SEAL Team 10 in Virginia Beach, have drawn widespread criticism, political heat and demonstrations outside the Norfolk base.

The cases are being handled locally, but the decision to press charges was made by Maj. Gen. C.T. Cleveland, head of Special Operations Command Central. Cleveland did so after the SEALs declined administrative punishment, which could have compromised their careers in special warfare.

McCabe, a petty officer second class, is charged with assault, making a false statement and dereliction of duty.

Lombardi's client, Petty Officer 1st Class Huertas, is charged with impeding an investigation, making a false statement and dereliction of duty, while Petty Officer 2nd Class Keefe faces charges of dereliction of duty and making a false statement.

Lombardi said she will consider asking the military judge overseeing Huertas' case to "abate" the proceeding, a ruling that could force the government to either grant immunity or drop the charges.

The next hearing in the case is scheduled for March 8 in Norfolk.

Eugene Fidell, a lawyer and president of the National Institute of Military Justice, said abatements are rare.

"Although it can be done, it's a tall order," Fidell said.

Kate Wiltrout, (757) 446-2629, kate.wiltrout@pilotonline.com

 

         Login or register to post comments

ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

Submitted by RoyR759 on Fri, 02/19/2010 at 11:16 pm.

need immunity if they're telling the truth?

         reply

         report violation

         hide all comments from this user

0Like Comment or Dislike Comment1

Submitted by HiYa on Sat, 02/20/2010 at 10:23 am.

These SEALS should NOT be on on trial. As far as I'm concerned the SEALS would have been justified in killing Abed on the spot. Instead they contained him and he makes claims that he was abused or hit. This "allegedly" witnessed by a 3rd Class P/O that may have not seen the whole incident and missed seeing Abed striking out or spiting on or biting our SEALS. These SEALS were in a war zone and had every right to try to keep control of a situation with physical means if necessary. Abed would kill every SEALS, P/O Demartino, his lawyer, your family and any other US citizen he could. He is a combatant, not a petty crook robbing the bubblegum machine. I could care less about his claims, all I care about is the health and well being of the SEALS and any other military member that put themselves in harms way to protect this country. Stop the political B/S and drop these charges.

         reply

         report violation

         hide all comments from this user

0Like Comment or Dislike Comment0

Comment viewing options

[Threaded list - expanded \/]

[Date - newest first \/]

[20 comments per page \/]

[Save settings]

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.


More articles from: Military rss feed   News rss feed  

 

Toolbox



 

Save & Share

 

Video

         Most Read

         Most Comments

http://hamptonroads.com/sites/all/themes/hamptonroads/img/topbox_jobs.jpg