If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view.
AAJ News Brief for Haytham Faraj | Friday, March 19, 2010 |
|
|
Leading the News
Black box data casts doubt on sudden Prius acceleration cases.
In a column in the Washington
Post (3/19), Frank Ahrens writes, "Funny how a little research can
change things," noting that after "exhaustive testing" of last week's event in
California in which a driver reported uncontrolled acceleration in a Prius, the
company reported "'significant inconsistencies' with the driver's story. ...
Today, federal investigators gave a preliminary report on the second incident,
this one in New York, that led to the 2005 Prius crashing into a stone wall and
causing minor injuries to the driver." NHTSA "said that the vehicle's on-board
computer records show that the brakes were never applied and the throttle was
wide open at the time of the crash. ... What is not known is whether the
throttle was wide open because the driver had the gas pedal mashed to the floor
or whether it stuck wide open on its own and, for whatever reason, the driver
failed to apply the
brakes."
The New
York Times (3/19, Bunkley) reports that NHTSA's report "that the car's
computer showed no evidence of braking...raises the possibility that the
[driver] mistakenly pressed the accelerator instead of the brake." However,
"what is unclear is whether the woman depressed the brake after the car sped up
and then took her foot off the brake just before the crash." Meanwhile, "Last
week, Toyota cast doubt on the account of a California man who said his 2008
Prius took him on a 30-mile ride at up to 94 miles an hour. Toyota said evidence
obtained from the car did not match the man's account and showed that the
brakes, though severely worn, would have been capable of stopping the
car."
Toyota initiated "game plan" to resist NHTSA'S calls for 2007 recall.
The Washington
Post (3/19, Whoriskey) reports that though Toyota and NHTSA "dismissed"
widely publicized reports last month about lobbyists having saved the automaker
$100 million by forestalling a recall in 2007 as an "idle boast," "a closer look
at the 2007 investigation, revealed in agency records and internal Toyota
e-mails, shows that after federal investigators at the time diagnosed a number
of potential dangers in Toyota cars and trucks, the automaker resisted the
findings and in the end escaped a broad recall that could have cost millions of
dollars." Moreover, Toyota, "which had developed a 'game plan' for handling the
inquiry, ignored NHTSA's broad findings and agreed only to a minor recall of a
single type of floor mat. The agency, which has the authority to order a recall,
did not push for
more."
Toyota calls on ABC to retract report on potential electronic fault.
Bloomberg
News (3/19, Ohnsman, Plungis) reports that Toyota has asked ABC News
"to retract and apologize for an 'irresponsible' report aired last month
suggesting electronics as the cause of sudden acceleration in its cars. ...
Toyota has said accelerators that stick or snag on floor mats can cause sudden
acceleration, with no evidence of failures in the electronic-control systems of
its cars and trucks. An ABC News report on Feb. 22 challenged that assumption,
and the network defended the report in a response to the
carmaker."
From the American Association for
Justice |
AAJ Education's Litigating
Medical Negligence and Injured Infant Cases Seminar, April 9-10 in Las
Vegas, is packed with the latest medical developments and trial techniques
you need to successfully litigate medical negligence and injured infant cases.
You'll get direct access to AAJ's experienced faculty which includes lawyers in
this practice area and prominent medical experts. They will share proven
strategies that will help you obtain justice for your clients. To view the
agenda and register, visit Continuing Legal Education. AAJ has introduced two
new monthly electronic newsletters! The Class Action Law Reporter
and the Motor Vehicle Law Reporter contain news, verdicts and
settlements, court opinions, links to recent journal articles, and more. They
are available by subscription to members of certain sections and litigation
groups in those practice areas. Subscribe now. The AAJ Exchange Litigation
Packet, Preparing a Motor Vehicle Collision Case, includes
resources helpful for every stage of litigation, from screening cases,
investigating insurance coverage, and exploring crashworthiness, to drafting
complaints and discovery requests, deposing expert witnesses, and preparing for
voir dire and trial. To order or view the table of contents for this or
the more than 130 other Litigation Packets, visit the AAJ
Exchange or call 1-800-344-3023. The Motor Vehicle Collision,
Highway, and Premises Liability Section focuses on auto collision cases,
truck safety, highway design, and premises liability. The Section also provides
discussion of federal no-fault issues. In addition, the Section offers a list
server, quarterly newsletter, networking, referral opportunities, and much more.
To learn about our 18 Sections and join, visit Sections. |
|
|
Civil Justice System
Ninth Circuit declines to re-hear al-Kidd v. Ashcroft.
The
Recorder (3/19, Levine) reports that Judge Milan Smith Jr. of the 9th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals "drew a torrent of opposition from
Republican-appointed colleagues over his decision last year to allow a suit
against John Ashcroft to go forward." Eight of the "9th Circuit judges
dissented Thursday. But Smith fought back, simultaneously issuing a rare
concurrence to the denial of en banc review." Smith wrote, "However
well-motivated Ashcroft's intentions may have been in creating, authorizing,
supervising and enforcing the misuse of the material witness statute in
contravention of the Fourth Amendment...his motivation does not presumptively
immunize the policy, or himself, the nation's chief law enforcement officer, and
others implementing and executing it, from complying with the rule of
law."
The AP
(3/18) reported that dissenting judges, led by Diarmuid O'Scannlain, said that
"the panel's decision essentially declared the 200-year-old material witness
statute unconstitutional and 'distorts the bedrock Fourth Amendment principle
that an official's subjective reasons for making an arrest are constitutionally
irrelevant.'" Smith "responded to the judges' dissent, saying his earlier
ruling didn't declare the material witness statute unconstitutional. Instead,
Smith said, the panel found that the statute doesn't authorize arrests like the
one used to detain
al-Kidd."
The New
York Times (3/19, Schwartz) reports, "Eight of the 25 judges who voted
signed dissents opposing the decision, which suggests that the United States
Supreme Court might take an interest in the case if Mr. Ashcroft
appeals."
MCM Services
Group: Your Turnkey Law Firm Marketing Experts
Practicing law is challenging enough without having to conduct legal
marketing campaigns. MCM Services Group makes legal marketing easy, so you can
focus on what you do best: practice law. For one low price, MCM offers
discounted advertising, call center services and a lead management system that
allows your firm to view and manage leads via our secure website. Call us today
at 1-888-507-6262 or visit
MCMServicesGroup.com.
|
Lawsuit claims Boy Scouts failed to prevent abuse.
The New
York Times (3/18, Yardley) reported, "Files kept secret for decades
that detail hundreds of claims of child sexual abuse by troop leaders of the Boy
Scouts of America are at the center of a civil court case that began here
Wednesday. Lawyers for a victim say the files show a centralized national effort
to conceal abuse while lawyers for the Boy Scouts say the files demonstrate
proactive efforts to stop it." The case, "a lawsuit brought by a man who was
abused by a scout leader in Oregon in the early 1980s, seeks $4 million in
damages for the victim, who was about 12 at the
time."
Third Circuit upholds $24.8M verdict against cigarette makers.
The Daily
Business Review (3/19, Pagliery) reports, "A 9-year-old products
liability case produced a major victory over tobacco companies [Philip Morris
USA, Brown & Williamson and Liggett Group] Wednesday when the 3rd District Court
of Appeal upheld a $24.8 million award to [John Lukacs'], a man who died of
cancer shortly after trial." The unanimous opinion "by Judges Richard Suarez,
Angel Cortiñas and Vance Salter is the first appellate ruling upholding a
verdict since the Florida Supreme Court dismantled a smoker class action and
opened the door to individual trials." Several plaintiff attorneys called "the
decision a landmark that will embolden those fighting tobacco
companies."
Former football player alleges mishandling of concussions.
The New
York Times (3/19, B12, Schwarz) reports, "A former Arena Football
League player filed a lawsuit Wednesday alleging that a team doctor mistreated
his concussions two years ago, resulting in permanent injury. The lawsuit, filed
in state court in Denver, is perhaps the first in which a professional football
player has claimed malpractice with regard to concussion care since football
head injuries gained national prominence three years ago. The player, Clay Rush,
was a kicker for the Colorado Crush of the A.F.L. in 2008 when he sustained a
series of hits to the head over several games - hits that were mishandled by a
team physician, Dr. Saurabh Mangalik, the complaint
says."
Frederick County, MD, families sue gas station over groundwater contamination.
The AP
(3/18) reported, "Twenty Frederick County [MD] families are suing the owners of
a Monrovia gas station for allegedly contaminating the area's drinking water
supply with gasoline. The lawsuit filed Monday in Frederick County Circuit Court
seeks $2.4 billion in damages from eight defendants, including the most recent
owner, SAABA Corp. of Ellicott City." State environmental regulators "say signs
of groundwater contamination from underground storage tanks surfaced in
2004."
Kentucky House committee clears bill to curb prisoners' "frivolous lawsuits."
The AP
(3/18) reported, "A bill intended to curb frivolous lawsuits from being filed
by prisoners has cleared a House committee. The House Judiciary Committee
approved the legislation, which would bar inmates from filing suits against the
Kentucky Department of Corrections until all administrative means have been
exhausted to resolve complaints. Republican Sen. John Schickel of Union, a
former jailer, said the legislation would also apply to inmates filing lawsuits
against county jails and private
prisons."
Trucking company settles Pennsylvania car accident case for $3M.
The Legal
Intelligencer (3/19, Duffy) reports, "An 83-year-old Luzerne County
woman will be paid $3 million in the settlement of her suit against a trucking
company and one of its drivers over a March 2007 accident in which she suffered
traumatic brain injury and numerous broken bones." Prior to the trial, "U.S.
District Judge James M. Munley refused to dismiss claims for punitive damages"
against Panther II Transportation. "Significantly, Munley ruled that if the
jury found the truck driver had 'entered the intersection without even braking
for an obvious red light,' it could then go on to 'reasonably decide that the
defendant was recklessly indifferent to a very real danger to others in the
area.'"
Some Philadelphia parents oppose school webcam class-action.
The AP
(3/18) reported, "Some suburban Philadelphia parents are seeking to halt a
potential class-action lawsuit accusing their school district of using cameras
in school-issued laptops to spy on students at home." Nearly "500 district
parents have signed a petition opposing the class-action suit," saying that
"they are angry about the webcams but are concerned about the financial impact
of a class-action settlement." In "their complaint submitted in U.S. District
Court in Philadelphia, they requested hiring an independent public advocate,
permanently banning laptop webcam use by the district and implementing new
regulations on the proper use of
technologies."
Texting-while-driving ban in Wisconsin may lead to punitive damages, says lawyer.
In an op-ed in the Wisconsin
Law Journal (3/18), Jonathan Groth of Groth Law Firm SC wrote that
Wisconsin state Rep. Peter Barca (D-Kenosha) "and others have introduced, and
both chambers may soon pass, a law banning texting while driving in Wisconsin.
With this law the argument that punitive damages should be assessed against
texting drivers will get that much easier." Groth comments, "Don't be surprised
to see a slew of punitive damage causes of action soon after the texting while
driving ban is
passed."
Congress
Democrats gain ground in effort for 216 healthcare votes.
Media reports on the House vote on healthcare reform generally portray the White
House and Democratic leaders as gaining ground. Even as they caution that the
tally remains fluid and the votes are not yet there for the President's plan,
the consensus in much of the coverage is that the bill will pass this weekend.
The New
York Times (3/19, Zeleny) reports that "with momentum steadily building
to a Sunday vote, the party leaders are also beginning to decide which
politically endangered lawmakers will be given absolution to vote no." While
"there are...very few votes to spare," adds the Times, "there are some. And
even most Republican leaders concede that the mystery is not so much whether
Democrats will reach the magic number of 216, but rather whose names will be
included as yes votes in the final
count."
Republican senators warn Dodd bill could be headed for party line vote.
The Washington
Post (3/19, Dennis) reports, "Two key Republican senators said Thursday
that the bill introduced this week by Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) to
overhaul financial regulation is headed for a strict party-line vote in the
Senate banking committee unless the measure undergoes significant amendments
during debate next week." Sen. Bob Corker said, "This next week, in essence, is
going to be a partisan markup." Also, "Richard C. Shelby (Ala.), the ranking
Republican on the banking committee...expressed little confidence Thursday that
Dodd would win over Republicans next week but said a bipartisan agreement could
materialize." Corker said at a Pew Financial Reform Project that Dodd "put
forward a bill that 'took a left turn.'" However, he added, "One of the
benefits is that I sort of know where he was willing to go, and hopefully we'll
get back to
that."
Drug Safety
AstraZeneca wins trial over Seroquel diabetes claims.
The Wall
Street Journal (3/19, Loftus) reports that a jury ruled in favor of
AstraZeneca PLC Thursday in a case that alleged the company's antipsychotic
Seroquel [quetiapine] caused a former user to develop
diabetes.
The AP
(3/18, Johnson) reported that, in a 7 to 1 vote, a jury found "that
AstraZeneca's Seroquel label provided prescribing doctors adequate warning with
respect to the risk of
diabetes."
The decision meant "the panel, which included a lawyer, didn't answer questions
about whether the drug contributed to Baker developing diabetes and how much in
damages Baker deserved," Bloomberg
News (3/18, Feeley, Fisk) reported. Attorneys representing the patient,
who "took Seroquel for lingering effects of post-traumatic stress syndrome
caused by his military service in Vietnam," argued that "AstraZeneca mishandled
the medicine, ignoring or downplaying its links to diabetes and weight gain."
The case "was the first of about 26,000 claims over the drug to be considered by
jurors." Reuters
(3/19) also covers the
story.
Many scientists supporting Avandia had financial ties to drugmaker, study says.
Bloomberg
News (3/19, Cortez) reports, "Most scientists who published articles
supporting GlaxoSmithKline Plc's diabetes drug Avandia [rosiglitazone] after it
was linked to heart disease in 2007 had financial ties to the company, according
to a Mayo Clinic report "
published March 18 in the British Medical
Journal.
"Researchers from the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota -- one of the few US research
organizations that does not rely on commercial sponsorship -- analyzed more than
200 articles published in scientific journals, including original papers,
editorials, and letters, which commented on the heart attack risk associated
with Avandia after 2007," the UK's Independent
(3/19, Laurance) reports. The investigators "found almost half (47 percent) of
the study authors had financial conflicts of interest, but almost a quarter (23
percent) did not disclose it. They were discovered by searching other
publications by the same author or on the
Internet."
Reuters
(3/19, Steenhuysen) reports that in February, internal documents and findings
from the Food and Drug Administration, released by US Senators, made the
recommendation that Avandia should be removed from the American market. The
agency now plans to conduct a July meeting to weigh the pros and cons of the
drug.
Employment/Workplace Safety
Veterans Affairs to settle racial discrimination complaint filed by hospital employees.
In the lead item for his Washington
Post (3/19, B3) "Federal Diary" column, Joe Davidson writes, "It's been
a long time coming, but a racial discrimination complaint filed by about 2,000
African American employees against" the Veterans Affairs hospital "in Richmond
is finally close to resolution." According to Davidson, VA "has decided to pay
$5 million to settle the allegations filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, and the department announced the settlement with an admission that
it bungled the case." Davidson notes, however, that the admission "covers only
a procedural issue," and "VA's top lawyer said it 'found no bias in the
administration of the awards program,' as the employees had
charged."
Tennessee Commerce Bank ordered to pay whistleblower $1M.
The AP
(3/18) reported, "The federal labor department has ordered Tennessee Commerce
Bank to reinstate a former corporate officer and pay more than $1 million in
back wages and other relief. According to a news release, the U.S. Department of
Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration found the bank had fired
the individual in violation of the whistleblower protection provisions of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002." An OSHA complaint "alleged the employee was placed
on administrative leave and then fired after raising concerns about internal
controls, employee accounts, insider trading and other
issues."
Product Safety
Plaintiffs', defendants' estimates of Chinese drywall repair costs diverge sharply.
The Sarasota
(FL) Herald Tribune (3/19, Kessler) reports that on Thursday, "After
calling a host of scientific experts and contractors to the stand the previous
day, the defense attorneys for manufacturer Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co. Ltd.,
turned their attention to the actual cost estimate for remediation. Roy M.
Carubba, the expert hired by KPT, testified that he believed the remediation was
'a very simple project' and laid out his line-by-line estimate for the cost of
repairing the Mandeville, La., home of Tatum and Charlene Hernandez, the
plaintiffs in this first bellwether trial." Carubba's estimate came to roughly
$58,000, while "the plaintiffs' numbers expert had concluded that it would cost
upwards of $160,000 just for the direct costs of the plaintiff's plan, and about
$200,000, including overhead and other associated costs that contractors would
charge for a typical
job."
Homebuilders' association releases Chinese drywall remediation guidelines.
The New
Orleans Times Picayune (3/18, Mowbray) reported, "While the U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission dallies on instructing people how to fix
homes damaged by corrosive drywall, the National Association of Home Builders
has become the first major player to advance its own set of 'evolving
solutions.'" Remarkably, "the repair procedures outlined by the home builders
are similar to what the committee of plaintiffs attorneys has proposed in" the
multidistrict litigation currently underway in New Orleans. "Rather than some
cheaper air-filtration and drywall treatments that others have suggested, the
home builders association advocates ripping out drywall, plumbing and possibly
wiring, paying for families to temporarily relocate, and allowing homes time to
air out after being gutted." Some "note that the formal assessment by the home
builders...could effectively serve as a blueprint for the Safety Commission and
help a diverse set of foreign manufacturers, builders, distributors, homeowners
and their attorneys coalesce around a limited set of
ideas."
Floridian attempts to fix drywall problems himself.
Florida's Treasure
Coast Palm (3/18) reported on Dan Savini of Port St. Lucie, FL, who
says that he "worked 12 hours a day, seven days a week" in an effort to
personally remediate the Chinese drywall damage to his condominium. "Savini
said he expected the CPSC to at least follow-up on his complaint. But the agency
never contacted him to verify his information, never acknowledged his complaint
or called him back to advise him on whether or not he should tell his tenants to
vacate the condo because of metal corrosion and possible health risks associated
with the toxic drywall." Manuel Comras, an attorney who "represents about a
dozen homeowners at" Savini's building, The Promenade in Tradition, "who are
suing Centerline Homes," said that "most of his clients saw litigation as a last
resort to dealing with the Chinese drywall and they only turned to the law when
they felt abandoned by builders and developers and couldn't get any answers from
the state and federal government on how to handle Chinese
drywall."
|
|
Louisiana lawmakers ask Fire Administrator for Chinese drywall assistance.
The Houma
(LA) Courier (3/18, DeSantis) reported, "Louisiana elected officials
are asking the federal government for help educating homeowners and providing
other assistance related to the threat of fire from Chinese drywall. Rep.
Charlie Melancon D-Napoleonville and U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu D-La. are among
those who wrote to U.S. Fire Administrator Kevin Cochran today, noting that the
corrosion of electrical wiring caused by Chinese today poses a hazard." The
letters "sent out Thursday ask that federal fire officials expand and continue
research on Chinese drywall fire hazards and provide guidance for homeowners,
outlining steps they can take to make their homes
safer."
FDA rules to restrict tobacco advertising.
The Washington
Post (3/19, Layton) reports that on Thursday, the FDA announced rules
"that will severely restrict the way the tobacco industry can advertise and sell
cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products, especially marketing efforts designed
to appeal to children and teenagers." Howard Koh, HHS' assistant secretary for
health, said, "This is truly a historic announcement in our country's public
health history. ... This is designed to prevent our children from becoming the
next generation of Americans to die early from tobacco-related
illnesses."
HHS Secretary Sebelius echoed that, saying, "The historic rule we're issuing
today will help our kids to stay healthy," the New
York Times (3/19, A14, Harris) reports. The rule will bar "sponsorship
of sporting or entertainment events by tobacco companies," and "would not allow
non-tobacco products to have the same names as those on tobacco products and it
restricts outdoor advertisements near schools." The FDA "will ensure
compliance" efforts which agency commissioner Margaret Hamburg said "are all
important new activities that will make a real
difference."
High chairs recalled for fall hazard.
The AP
(3/18) reported that the government is announcing a recall of 1.2 million high
chairs it says pose a fall hazard to children. The Consumer Product Safety
Commission announced the voluntary recall Thursday involving the product made by
Graco Children's Products Inc., of Atlanta." Chair tip-overs have "resulted in
24 reports of injuries including bumps and bruises to the head, a hairline
fracture to the arm and cuts, bumps and bruises and scratches to the
body.'"
Children's bicycle bells recalled.
The AP
(3/18) reported, "The hardware store chain Do It Best Corp. is recalling a
series of children's bicycle bells because the paint on the products contains
too much lead. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and Do It Best
announced the voluntary recall on
Thursday."
Also in the News
Lerach to speak on securities litigation.
Law.com
(3/19, Bronstad) reports, "Fresh out of prison, disgraced securities
plaintiffs' attorney Bill Lerach has returned to the public light. On April 12,
Lerach is scheduled to speak at a University of San Diego School of Law panel
titled 'Where is Corporate and Securities Litigation Headed Post-Crisis?'" The
event "will address trends in the aftermath of the recent financial crisis,
including changes in state court filings in Delaware and strategies used in
securities class actions against financial institutions in federal
courts."
Bloomberg
News (3/19, Kolker) reports, "The four lawyers who ran Milberg Weiss
Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, the firm that got investors $45 billion from
securities lawsuits against publicly traded companies, are reacquainting
themselves with life on the outside now that they've left
prison."
NYTimes endorses West Virginia's initiative to publicly finance judicial elections.
The New
York Times (3/19, A24) editorializes that the West Virginia State
Legislature "has approved a pilot program of voluntary public financing for two
State Supreme Court elections in 2012. Under this promising initiative,
candidates who raise a reasonable threshold of small contributions will qualify
to receive $200,000 for a contested primary and up to $350,000 for a contested
general election." West Virginia, "which will join North Carolina, New Mexico
and Wisconsin in adopting public financing of judicial races, is setting a good
example at a time when judicial neutrality and the appearance of neutrality is
under severe threat across the country from escalating special-interest spending
on judicial
campaigns."
|
|
AAJ News Brief is a digest of the most important news selected from thousands of
sources by the editors of Custom Briefings. The presence of advertising does not
endorse, or imply endorsement of, any products or services by the American
Association for
Justice.
This complimentary copy of AAJ News Brief was sent to haytham@puckettfaraj.com as part of your
American Association for Justice membership. View Custom Briefings' privacy policy. Neither
Custom Briefings nor the American Association for Justice is liable for the use
of or reliance on any information contained in this
briefing.
For information about other member benefits, please contact American Association
for Justice Member Service Center at (800)
424-2727.
American Association for Justice | 777 6th Street, NW | Washington, DC 20001
Copyright © 2010 by Custom Briefings
|
11190 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 130 | Reston, VA 20191
|
|