Re: To Deal or not to Deal

To: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>

Subject: Re: To Deal or not to Deal

Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:32:50 -0800 (PST)

Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jroweusmc@yahoo.com designates 72.30.238.141 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jroweusmc@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com

Cc: "scott.shinn@usmc.mil" <scott.shinn@usmc.mil>

Delivered-to: haytham@puckettfaraj.com

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1327545170; bh=s5k4Xo8U8TiuRmHSBRyTNpj+Cjo+F1Zu4uSG/t+xUCQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wsJq9V2N3xAxdUV6Zezue6sZ0AnSY8V/HjEOUccI/lC7ESrljykGjI+Hpwh9qmrkw5qit5dXm9gNJQW2jaE3Fas6JT/uK0aqb3YtoxQ3aiC1vCOeOkj/JLj6lL5Sh293Lg6wv2HbVbgD4rgZA6FNuQeljkOaQ1vEBeFFcn109p8=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TKonHPj2wrkDMAUHMonbuwvVaXIs23Dk+B1EEVsNJjA317wT+MJVjqlyJ08itM37HS17a8jP16G4USvF2My0YZPkUu9K8rC8kKsotLait9UADE+7S0Ng6/GZyoTfXclHqtMfb7Z9HeQdJ0n1rPuPblJVzBwHHBa+VaxCNwqkOVQ=;

In-reply-to: <D5570F58-1629-4831-9CF4-DB560A259640@puckettfaraj.com>

References: <1327525340.27834.YahooMailNeo@web161901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <D5570F58-1629-4831-9CF4-DB560A259640@puckettfaraj.com>

Reply-to: jim rowe <jroweusmc@yahoo.com>

I though all general court martial convictions show up as felonies. So that would make the characterization of service more important?

From: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
To: jim rowe <jroweusmc@yahoo.com>
Cc: "scott.shinn@usmc.mil" <scott.shinn@usmc.mil>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: To Deal or not to Deal

Your conviction is not a felony.

Haytham Faraj

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 25, 2012, at 1:02 PM, jim rowe <jroweusmc@yahoo.com> wrote:

Gentlemen,

Maigen and I have a few questions in going forward with a BOI or offering the deal of taking an OTH in exchange for an NJP rather than a General Court Martial Conviction.

1) From my limited internet research it appears that in the federal system all General Court Martials are considered felonies. Since I am now a felony adulterer, which is harder to explain in your opinion, a felony conviction or an OTH?

2) Does my taking an OTH effect my civil case against the Klay's?

3) What loss of benefits would be worth fighting for in a BOI characterization of discharge if it means keeping a felony conviction on my record?

Thanks

Jim

References:

To Deal or not to Deal
- From: jim rowe <jroweusmc@yahoo.com>