[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Litton Article 32



Gentlemen,

Just read the IO report and do not disagree...I think Command will accept the SCM. Would your client accept this? Not positive but Command is willing to consider not AdSeping, however if they choose to would Litton be willing to waive his board? Thanks.

v/r,
Blake

-----Original Message-----
From: Cory R. Weck [mailto:crw@wtw-law.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 14:34
To: Haytham Faraj; Peltz Capt Timothy
Cc: Henderson Capt Clayton K
Subject: RE: Litton Article 32 

Gents,

 

Attached is the 32 Report re: Litton.  Please advise if any questions.

 

S/F

 

Maj. Weck

 

Cory R. Weck

Attorney at Law

Welebir Tierney & Weck, PLC

2068 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 215

Redlands, CA 92374

Office:909-335-0444

Fax: 909-335-0452

Cory R. Weck

Attorney at Law
Welebir Tierney & Weck, PLC
2068 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 215
Redlands, CA 92374
Office:909-335-0444
Fax: 909-335-0452


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature