[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tomorrow

To: "Haytham Faraj" <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
Subject: Re: Tomorrow
From: jroweusmc@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 00:17:09 +0000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jroweusmc@yahoo.com designates 98.139.212.162 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jroweusmc@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com
Cc: "scott.shinn@usmc.mil" <scott.shinn@usmc.mil>
Delivered-to: haytham@puckettfaraj.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1322785033; bh=yn9oT7r5UfST4vUowp1m9hdr/jdhfavp2DiwrZXIwtY=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=TwmNnIfGlWJX9K1HVK2UW1mQ81Vs2yB5I0Gcdl+Gx0Q7+VK1vZWcx64ystY26xt25zdmSRBwvZg2OtkjW9/ircFk+N/+DcCrl2KMvL+g5scg8BsICCMpx1z7PLP42DrGnj9ucOogcGXYToRX+gfDxt4gZujLTj5vGj6WjgvCQ2o=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=WWOi8xoPjCVZhOCp2KaatQcn9JbzpmhWcyywoVWm+a0jsIXwB7I+VwkVhT0bWnlUcr99QH3sOl8xnT+WpCJJIXExstUIee/rAs+ZEj2VFA539MH14gVhLdr8r6DD52LskJ+E02mJu9wEPLKJU2c28OM2DrjbqzzT6vKn10NTXi4= ;
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <1736440866-1322782185-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-copy_sent_folder-167369707-@b16.c5.bise6.blackberry>
References: <1736440866-1322782185-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-copy_sent_folder-167369707-@b16.c5.bise6.blackberry>
Reply-to: jroweusmc@yahoo.com
Sensitivity: Normal

Question. If the phone conversation that was taped is so convincing for people to believe that there was a previous relationship then why was klay not charged with anything while she was still in uniform. Was she granted immunity? Or was it a back door deal.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: jroweusmc@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 23:29:32 
To: Haytham Faraj<haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
Reply-To: jroweusmc@yahoo.com
Cc: scott.shinn@usmc.mil<scott.shinn@usmc.mil>
Subject: Re: Tomorrow

Rgr
------Original Message------
From: Haytham Faraj
To: jroweusmc@yahoo.com
Cc: scott.shinn@usmc.mil
Subject: Re: Tomorrow
Sent: Dec 1, 2011 18:26

No need to be there Jim. 

Haytham Faraj 
Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 1, 2011, at 6:11 PM, jroweusmc@yahoo.com wrote:

> Gentlemen
> 
> If you need me there tomorrow let me know. I can change the flight. I don't want to leave anything to chance. I will be in Vegas for a few days (just cashing in my free nights in case I am locked up for a while)  but will have my blackberry if anything comes up.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jim
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

Prev by Date: RE: Litton Article 32
Next by Date: Re: Tomorrow
Previous by thread: Re: Tomorrow
Next by thread: Re: Tomorrow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread