|
So to fully preserve this issue, the next steps would be:
1) Ask the CA to recall Vokey, using the same argument (JAG rules trump TX rules and TX rules acknowledge this). 2) Request a site visit to Haditha and the opportunity to interview witnesses. 3) At some point during trial, assert on the record that defense preparation has been negatively impacted by not having Vokey. Is that correct?
> Subject: RE: Wuterich writ appeal denied > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:28:40 -0700 > From: meridith.marshall@usmc.mil > To: dhsullivan@aol.com; Dwight.Sullivan@pentagon.af.mil; kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil; neal@puckettfaraj.com > CC: babu_kaza@hotmail.com; haytham@puckettfaraj.com; ksripinyo@yahoo.com > > Gentlemen, > > So I guess we are rolling on 30 November. > > Neal and Haytham, I would like to have a meeting (if you are out here) or a phone conference IOT see how I can most assist the team. I have been so very busy with my own case load, all I have been able to do on Wuterich is read your email traffic. > > R/ > > Major Meridith L. Marshall > Senior Defense Counsel > MCAS, Miramar > 858-577-1720 (desk line) > dsn 267-1720 > 858-997-8332 (government cell) > meridith.marshall@usmc.mil > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dhsullivan@aol.com [mailto:dhsullivan@aol.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 9:25 AM > To: Marshall Maj Meridith L; Dwight.Sullivan@pentagon.af.mil; kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil; neal@puckettfaraj.com > Cc: babu_kaza@hotmail.com; haytham@puckettfaraj.com; ksripinyo@yahoo.com > Subject: Wuterich writ appeal denied > > As expected, except they didn't even put "without prejudice" on the order. > > Semper Fi, > DHS |