[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wuterich writ appeal



I love it.  I know the typos and varying fonts can be corrected.  It all makes perfect sense and provides excellent counterpoints to the Govt answer.
Thanks, Dwight!  
Neal
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:26 AM, DHSULLIVAN@aol.com wrote:

We should reply to the Government's answer as soon as possible, since our writ appeal won't be circulated for decision until we reply.  We're hoping that if it's circulated soon, Chief Judge Effron will take part in its consideration.  (If he chose to, he could even continue to participate in the case as a Senior Judge after 30 September.)
 
Attached is a VERY, VERY rough draft.  I haven't even proof read what I wrote and I was pretty pissed at the government while writing it, so it will probably have to be toned down.  But this will get us started.  I don't see any reason why we can't file on Wednesday.
 
Right now it's 3,500 words.  Our limit is 7.000.  So we shouldn't have any problem with length.
 
Please chop away.
 
Semper Fi,
DHS
<Wuterich writ appeal reply (12 Sep 2011) draft 1.docx>