Re: Verbatim Houda_Final Draft (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Laquisha Douglas <shalon122@gmail.com>]

Okay, I will go through it myself when I'm done with this trial. I just wanted to send it to you since she was done.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

I'll check my recording.  I stopped listening to it after a couple of hours
because it was difficult to hear.  I'll review it.  Thank you for getting
this to me.  I recommend SSG Astrinos go through it once because there are a
lot of mistakes.  Tell her that I appreciate her efforts.

Thank you

-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas, Laquisha S CPT MIL USA FORSCOM
[mailto:laquisha.douglas@us.army.mil]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 11:53 PM
To: Haytham Faraj
Cc: Laquisha Douglas
Subject: FW: Verbatim Houda_Final Draft (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO


Haytham,

Take a look at the final transcript. I need to review it myself, but I'm
still in trial so it will not happen tonight. SSG Astrinos came across a gap
in the recording toward the end. She checked that against what they had over
in military justice and they did not have it either. Can you let me know if
your audio also has a gap? Conveniently, it occurs around Mr. Low's inquiry
into her motives to lie. Let me know what you think once you have reviewed
it. Just FYI, in the past I have filed a motion for a new Art 32 based on
complete loss of the audio recording (no verbatim was done) and the motion
was denied because the Rules for Court-martial don't require the Art 32 to
be recorded in the first place.

V/R,

Laquisha


-----Original Message-----
From: Jes Astrinos [mailto:jes420_norcal@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:44 PM
To: Douglas, Laquisha S CPT MIL USA FORSCOM
Subject: Verbatim Houda_Final Draft

Ma'am,

This is the final transcript. I did a spell check but I don't want to call
it final until I get your approval.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO