----- Forwarded message from michael.yon@gmail.com -----
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 02:55:04 +0430
From: Michael Yon <michael.yon@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Michael Yon <michael.yon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: You up for a scrap?
To: mark@markzaid.com
Here's the ground rules:
http://www.michaelyon-online.com/more-flak-from-military-public-affairs.htm
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:52 AM, <mark@markzaid.com> wrote:
Quoting Michael Yon <michael.yon@gmail.com>: Mark,The embed agreement forbids embedded writers/journos/etc from wearing camouflage in combat. This endangers the lives of the troops, embeds, and endangers mission success. I believe there is no legal basis for this prohibition, especially so when the gear in question is not US issue. Am not thinking of lawsuit, simply writing something that contests the agreement, and then I simply would wear camouflage during combat operations and wait to see what they do. If they disembed for this, then possibly lawsuit. By the way, the local commander wants me to wear camouflage during combat missions. The last major mission I went on, this past weekend, resulted in 27 firefights. We took 1x KIA, 2x wounded. Environmental camouflage may not have prevented these gunshots, but it certainly prevents many others that we never hear about. I think that the Pentagon can be pushed back in the court of public reality simply by making a valid argument (in dispatch form) that they have no legal basis for this policy, and that the Pentagon itself has decided to endanger the lives of its own troops. Where do you fit in? I would write the dispatch using photos, and run it by you for a read, and insert your name/creds quoting your opinion. What do you think? -- Very Respectfully, Michael YonCan you send me a copy of the embed agreement?
-- Very Respectfully, Michael Yon ----- End forwarded message -----
Can you send me a copy of the embed agreement?Mark,
The embed agreement forbids embedded writers/journos/etc from wearing
camouflage in combat. This endangers the lives of the troops, embeds, and
endangers mission success. I believe there is no legal basis for
this prohibition, especially so when the gear in question is not US issue.
Am not thinking of lawsuit, simply writing something that contests the
agreement, and then I simply would wear camouflage during combat operations
and wait to see what they do. If they disembed for this, then possibly
lawsuit. By the way, the local commander wants me to wear camouflage during
combat missions. The last major mission I went on, this past weekend,
resulted in 27 firefights. We took 1x KIA, 2x wounded. Environmental
camouflage may not have prevented these gunshots, but it certainly prevents
many others that we never hear about. I think that the Pentagon can be
pushed back in the court of public reality simply by making a valid argument
(in dispatch form) that they have no legal basis for this policy, and that
the Pentagon itself has decided to endanger the lives of its own troops.
Where do you fit in? I would write the dispatch using photos, and run it by
you for a read, and insert your name/creds quoting your opinion.
What do you think?
--
Very Respectfully,
Michael Yon