[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WUTERICH V. U.S., 200800183 - 8 AUG 2011 ORAL ARGUMENT



"Substantially outperform?"  What?  So, do you drive a Volvo, too?  Actually we were looking for more of a face-melting, ass-beating sort of thing.  There should be someone's blood on the carpet when the arguments are done.  Like that.
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

On Jul 22, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Babu Kaza wrote:

I am on AT at Bridgeport for Javelin Thrust until 31 July (been here since 17 July), and then I have drill the following weekend on 6-7 August.  I have no doubt I could substantially outperform 46 regardless, but it may make more sense for Col Sullivan or another Team Wuterich member to do this one.  But I can do whatever is required. 

> Subject: FW: WUTERICH V. U.S., 200800183 - 8 AUG 2011 ORAL ARGUMENT
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:31:07 -0400
> From: kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil
> To: neal@puckettfaraj.com; haytham@puckettfaraj.com; dhsullivan@aol.com; Dwight.Sullivan@pentagon.af.mil; meridith.marshall@usmc.mil;babu_kaza@hotmail.com
> 
> Here's the email I received.
> 
> I don't think it means that the Court is leaning one way or another, personally. I sort of suspected that the Court would take a little more time with the decision this time around given CAAF's handling of their summary denial in the most recent round of litigation. I'm not sure what Col Sullivan has planned for the oral argument, but presumably he'd want Babu to argue it if he's (1) willing and (2) able.
> 
> v/r
> Sip
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Morison, Gregory M LT OJAG, CODE 51 
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 10:40
> To: Sripinyo, Kirk Major NAMARA, CODE 45; Moore, Samuel C Captain OJAG, CODE 46
> Subject: WUTERICH V. U.S., 200800183 - 8 AUG 2011 ORAL ARGUMENT
> 
> Gentlemen:
> 
> This email is a follow-up on the informal heads-up I gave both of you that the Court will be ordering oral argument for Wuterich on Monday, 8 Aug 11 at 1100. I am informing the two of you because your names were on the most recent briefs that the Court received. Mr. Toidl is out today, so do not expect the order before COB today. Instead, it will go out Monday or Tuesday latest. However, the Court wanted to give you as much advance notice as possible. There will be two issues relating to whether mandamus review is appropriate and the underlying issue of the termination of the attorney-client relationship between SSgt Wuterich and Lt Col Vokey. Let me know if you have any procedural questions. Thank you.
> 
> Very respectfully,
> 
> Gregory Morison
> LT, JAGC, USN
> Law Clerk
> Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (Code 51)
> 1254 Charles Morris St. SE
> BLDG 58, Suite 320
> Washington Navy Yard, D.C. 20374-5124
> Tel: (202) 685-7726; DSN 312-325-7726
> Email: gregory.morison@navy.mil
> 
> FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY / PRIVACY SENSITIVE / ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT. The information contained in this e-mail and/or accompanying documents is intended for the exclusive use of the individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is pre-decisional, privileged or protected from release under the Privacy Act, FOIA or other applicable laws. Do not disseminate this e-mail, or its contents, to anyone who does not have an official need for access, or without the express consent of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, you are on notice that copying, disclosure or any distribution of this message, in any form, is prohibited. Any misuse or unauthorized disclosure can result in both civil and criminal penalties.
> 
>