No, Sir. Just for your SA.
Neal A. Puckett, Esq LtCol, USMC (Ret) Puckett & Faraj, PC 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 703.706.9566
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.
On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Babu Kaza wrote: Do you want to do a Reply?
Subject: Fwd: Government Argument and Evidence on Defense Motion to Abate Proceedings Pending Involuntary Recall of Mr. Vokey to Active Duty From: neal@puckettfaraj.comDate: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:29:00 -0400 CC: kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil; babu_kaza@hotmail.comTo: DHSULLIVAN@aol.com; dwight.sullivan@pentagon.af.milHaytham objected to this submission. His objection to follow. Neal Neal A. Puckett, Esq LtCol, USMC (Ret) Puckett & Faraj, PC 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 703.706.9566
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. Begin forwarded message: Date: April 28, 2011 8:54:55 PM EDT
Subject: Government Argument and Evidence on Defense Motion to Abate Proceedings Pending Involuntary Recall of Mr. Vokey to Active Duty
Your honor,
I hope you had a safe trip back to Japan. Attached is the government's written argument ICO U.S. v. Wuterich. Please note that I have included several attachments to the argument. Including two affidavits that are newly obtained (Ingersoll & Tate). I will ensure that the this new evidence is marked as the next appellate exhibits in order, and attach them to the record at our next Article 39a session.
Very respectfully,
Maj Gannon
|